V8 HSV with LSV 25.07.05 - final visit?

V8 HSV with LSV 25.07.05 - final visit?

Author
Discussion

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Though I would post on this topic as I have had so many conversations regarding the issues that I have with the cars engine modifications to date, hopefully looking for closure on the whole saga and despite what people might have thought I am still confident that LSV will be able to realise the cars potential for making substantial power.

What LSV have done to the suspension and its subsequent handling characteristics is in my opinion totally awesome, it’s like driving a different car, installs confidence and takes cornering ability to new heights, can’t wait to get it on track once I fit a quieter exhaust system.

I will be compiling a long-term road test covering 35,000 miles of ownership from purchase at 3 yrs old (30,000 on the clock) car that will initially deal with the car as standard and its subsequent modifications which I hope to host on my web site once I have evaluated LSV’s final work.


V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
What are you having done on the 25th?

A57 HSV

1,510 posts

231 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
New suspension set up does sound fantastic, maybe my home improvements can wait a bit longer!
I am also confident that LSV will sort out the tuning, it's obviously very important/vital for them to get it right.
Really look forward to reading your long term test & hopefully actually seeing your car sometime soon.

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
V8 OSV

It is indeed a very long story but in essence it relates to ECU tuning via a rolling road after realisation that a cetain Oz supplier does not tune ECU's for specific applications.

I have done literally everything I can think of to make the car faster, better handling, quicker stopping and expect + 600 figures in terms of BHP & torque, looking for no more 'work-in-progress' comments & closure on the whole saga that has been going on for over a year, over £50k spent on mods to date and I now expect results in the engine department!




>> Edited by V8HSV on Friday 15th July 14:25

V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Chrikes, with that sort of investment (£70K total?) I would want a bloody good car too!

Good luck.

I will be down at LSV again, as soon as they can give me some horny manifolds and some refuelling.

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
It is already a bloody good car but 500+ brake just feels so slow and I hate the black smoke associated with over-fuelling. I expect it to be sub 10 seconds to 100 mph and 4 seconds to 60 and will go for the max (not in uk) when I get it back from Linden, should be good for 195 mph, I've seem 180+ on French roads already.

A57 HSV

1,510 posts

231 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Will, did hear that it's poss. to change the gearing, making 6th a full on gear which should give you c.200mph+. Not for me at the moment as I'm still using the HSV for business & need the economy of 6th. But will be getting a newer estate soonish, so will use that more, in which case!
I've hit c.175mph on a slight uphill gradient & I defo. had more to go. Felt o.k as well, but aerodynamics & wind resistance play a massive role at high speeds, did read once about the extra power needed to get just an extra 5mph above 170mph, can't remember how much it was, but it was a lot.

>> Edited by A57 HSV on Friday 15th July 15:18

V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Sounds good.

I tried my car on the IOM last weekend and it recorded 176 mph on the clock, in 5th gear, but I am not sure how accurate that is.
Top cog slowed the car.

caspy

1,791 posts

237 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Will tyre integrity become on issue at these speeds with all the ever weight ?

V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
[quote=A57 HSV]did read once about the extra power needed to get just an extra 5mph above 170mph, can't remember how much it was, but it was a lot.

You are right, that extra mph at huge speeds requires a massive power hike.
I know a fella with a 2004 Porsche 996 Turbo and he has got 100bhp+ more than stock, but the top speed has risen by about 10 mph.

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
I think the 4-door body hits an aerodynamic brick wall at 195 mph whereas the 2-door body will getr past 200 mph.

Yes revised gearing could get it past 200 but to be honest it is off little interest to me, yes I want to finf the max speed but in reality I will only be using 130-160 as top speed, tyres certainly are an issue, especially mine being 250 KG over weight.

Been quoted £3k for two new cogs, I think panoma has a new ratio set-up?

A57 HSV

1,510 posts

231 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Must admit I'm not too sure about doing 200mph+ in a Commodre with a TWR designed body kit, even if Ian Callum was the designer.
I noticed a lot more wind noise at c.175mph, not sure if all the bits would stay on at 200mph. LOL.
Do have an ambition to do 200mph in a car at sometime though.

jagsy

1,462 posts

252 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Good luck Will, keep us posted.

sjc

14,020 posts

271 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
Seconded!

V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
V8HSV said:

500+ brake just feels so slow and I hate the black smoke associated with over-fuelling. I expect it to be sub 10 seconds to 100 mph and 4 seconds to 60 and will go for the max (not in uk) when I get it back from Linden, should be good for 195 mph, I've seem 180+ on French roads already.


Just a thought, but;

1) 500+ bhp, but feels slow...
2) Around 70,000 (probably hard) miles covered...
3) Engine smokes...

Could this just be that the engine needs a freshen-up in general and THEN fine-tuning with the fuelling, etc.? A fresh set of pistons, valves, etc. made a huge difference on my old Corvette.

Maybe a short rebuild is in order if you want the car to be at potential?

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
The car has been very well looked after in terms of servicing, not allways booted to hell and back and am confident of engine health. Paul (ukhsv) did remap the bottom end and it was fuelled correctly to 4.5k without black smoke, the ECU refresh/auto tune put it .back to over fueling

V8 OHV

261 posts

227 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
I just spoke to a friend in central California who works on 'built' Corvettes and Mustangs for a living and he said that at 70,000 miles he would be giving a car like yours a fresh set of pistons and rings, some new valves and a head clean and tidy-up.
Then he would fine tune it on a rolling road.

>> Edited by V8 OHV on Saturday 16th July 17:21

comm_SS_V8

310 posts

233 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
Would an engine refresh also be advisable on a stock or stock+tune LS1? I've got 68k on the clock atm.

Anyone know approximate cost? Boosted_LS1, any comments?

V8HSV

Original Poster:

2,457 posts

253 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
Err, had the head off not that long ago for mods, not been really used in anger since so fairly confident of engine health to date

Boosted LS1

21,190 posts

261 months

Sunday 17th July 2005
quotequote all
comm_SS_V8 said:
Would an engine refresh also be advisable on a stock or stock+tune LS1? I've got 68k on the clock atm.

Anyone know approximate cost? Boosted_LS1, any comments?


If it was a saab 68 k would mean it's almost run in LOL so the same would apply for the lsx. A compression test would reveal all. I bought ring packs etc just to freshen up engines but to be honest don't see the point. I've never been asked to do it! The labour element makes it quite an expensive proposition, well it is the way I build engines . A crate short engine would be viable if you have a smoker with low cylinder pressures, ie under 200 psi. Or somebody could just throw it together with a torque wrench.

Boosted.