4.0 litre tamora whats that all about?

4.0 litre tamora whats that all about?

Author
Discussion

bad boy

Original Poster:

821 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
can someone please make sense of the suppposed 4.0 litre early tamoras

thom

2,745 posts

274 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
As far as I understand it TVR wanted to "get rid" of all the 4.0l speed six engines to be mounted in the Tuscan before introducing the 3.6l unit.
Therefore, it's quite understandable that some of the early Tamoras might have been fitted with the previous 4.0l unit...all IMO of course

flasher

9,238 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Spot on Thom and that's what was hinted to me by someone from Blackpool at the weekend.......

As mine was No.2 Tamora, If that is the case it's a fair chance that mine has a 4.0L engine.....

thom

2,745 posts

274 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Hey Flasher!
If yours is a 4.0, why not thinking about getting it to red rose spec?

(sorry, I always think of MORE )

nubbin

6,809 posts

279 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Any idea on numbers flash. As in my e-mail, when we were "out and about", I wasn't aware that you were storming away from me and gb - I wonder if we benefitted from this free "upgrade" as well?! Great selling point when you want to sell, and also a very good reason for keeping it!!

PetrolTed

34,428 posts

304 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Recent rolling road figures have once again confirmed that Speed Six engines are producing almost what they say on the tin unlike.. er... some of the er... older engines, allegedly

thom

2,745 posts

274 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:
unlike.. er... some of the er... older engines, allegedly


Don't worry Ted, I reckon your car is capable of more than a couple horsepower...

HarryW

15,151 posts

270 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

quote:
unlike.. er... some of the er... older engines, allegedly


Don't worry Ted, I reckon your car is capable of more than a couple horsepower...



Teds being a Ford lump pretty well does what 'it says on the tin' as well, it's just the other one that might not...

Harry

flasher

9,238 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Any idea on numbers flash. As in my e-mail, when we were "out and about", I wasn't aware that you were storming away from me and gb - I wonder if we benefitted from this free "upgrade" as well?! Great selling point when you want to sell, and also a very good reason for keeping it!!



No, all I got was "they had some left over....."

I seem to remember having to wait for you two after I flew off without you when the M69 met the M1......

Apache and I couldn't believe you were "running it in" at those speeds....

I think mine is a 4.0, remember mine was built in October 2001 that was quite a while ago now......

Steve _T

6,356 posts

273 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
I'm sure you can upgrade to Red Rose spec. very inexpensively - with the aid of a black marker pen (see pics for PH Meet 2).

Sorry couldn't resist

Steve.

simpo one

85,569 posts

266 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Beats me why they would bother with a 3.6 if there's a perfectly good 4.0. But even then it's two cylinders short!!!!!!

apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all


Apache and I couldn't believe you were "running it in" at those speeds....

I'll say, when you hooned off to the airfield on a single track unknown road, we both cringed, as Harry Enfield said "That blokes a nutter...OI NUTTER !"

nubbin

6,809 posts

279 months

Tuesday 16th April 2002
quotequote all
Yeah, I couldn't understand why I had to wait for you! After all, I had already driven down that road once, testing TMS' demo - even my memory isn't that bad!!

gb61390

1,879 posts

283 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
Mine was one of the first couple of customer so after all the dealer demos mine was still one of the first twenty cars. Wonder if mine's a 4.0l as well?
As Nubbin says there was no noticeable performance difference between mine, his and Flasher's cars?
Mind you the 4.0l Tuscan is rated at 350bhp which is exactly the same as the 3.6l Tamora.
Don't suppose there's any visible difference in the engine's?
Cheers...... Andrew

hatchn

352 posts

285 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
Whilst we are talking about engines and the such. What fuel do you guys uses in your Tamora’s. In the handbook it says 95 unless on a track then it recommends 98. I always used to put 98 in the Griff500 and have all but once in the Tamora. So what's the felling, 95 or 98 ?
Cheers,
Nick

nubbin

6,809 posts

279 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
Flash, you had to wait for us because we got stuck in traffic on the entry slip - you were on two wheels hooning down the outside looking for victims to pursue!!

gb61390

1,879 posts

283 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
Nick, I've used 95 at all times. No problems other than it sounds like a tractor when cold! But I think seems a Speed6 charactristic!
Nick, Nubbin, Flasher, etc. What profile are your front tyres? Mine are 225/35 but when I reread the Autocar article last night it said 225/45. My rears are 235/40 which tie up with Autocar.
Cheers....... Andrew

hatchn

352 posts

285 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
I'm sure mine are 35 on the front and 40 on the back as well.

phil1

621 posts

283 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Mind you the 4.0l Tuscan is rated at 350bhp which is exactly the same as the 3.6l Tamora.



The Cerbera Speed Six is rated at 350bhp 4.0l. The original 4.0l Tuscan has 360bhp. Don't know how you tell the difference, but my Tuscan, early 4.0l, had better have the extra 10bhp!!!

thom

2,745 posts

274 months

Wednesday 17th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

The original 4.0l Tuscan has 360bhp.

Wasn't it 380bhp?