New DB9 testing pics...

New DB9 testing pics...

Author
Discussion

jonby

5,357 posts

158 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
beg your pardon, I didn't repeat my phrase verbatim of course ! The point still stands - read the phrase in context

AMDBSNick

6,997 posts

163 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
jonby said:
beg your pardon, I didn't repeat my phrase verbatim of course ! The point still stands - read the phrase in context
Sorry Jonby I wasn't disagreeing with you wink I think what I am trying to say is "Are potential Aston owners really that interested whether their car can compete with Ferrari, Lambo et al" IMHO this BHP thing is getting well beyond most mere mortals. Only useful in "Top Trumps" biggrin

Vantagefan

643 posts

171 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
It's all about the numbers.

I'm going to guess at 550 bhp and £250,000. As the current DBS has carbon fibre panels I'd wager progression on this. I wouldn't go as far as every exterior panel but I think it will be close.

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
jonby said:
Or do you think AM can launch a new car that sits at the top of their range with a price tag to match that doesn't improve on the performance of it's 10 yr old predecessor ?
They can do what they want! They released the Supercharged Vantages with 550 and then 600bhp, no factory Aston power has been seen like that for 15-20 years and no-one is any the worse for it or has ever claimed the V12s were weedy pigeons.

As mentioned, it hopefully need to be better than 520bhp or questions will be asked in Parliament (and on Top gear), but it doesn;t require 600+ to try and compete with the F720. You buy a Ferrari or an Aston for very different reasons.

A development of the new 310 car with an old school supercharger on our beloved V12 and 600+ for £400k or so would sell a good few though ad would be compared to the F720. People who can afford those cars don't care much what they do, just want one of everything.

Although they did the Zagato with the standard V12V unit so people don't complain with an Aston it seems.

George H

14,707 posts

165 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
...but it doesn;t require 600+ to try and compete with the F720. You buy a Ferrari or an Aston for very different reasons.
Just FYI, the new Ferrari is called the F12 Berlinetta, not the F720 smile

I'll stop being pedantic now!

DB9VolanteDriver

2,613 posts

177 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
jonby said:
Or do you think AM can launch a new car that sits at the top of their range with a price tag to match that doesn't improve on the performance of it's 10 yr old predecessor ?
They can do what they want! They released the Supercharged Vantages with 550 and then 600bhp, no factory Aston power has been seen like that for 15-20 years and no-one is any the worse for it or has ever claimed the V12s were weedy pigeons.
I don't for one moment believe those old claims. Back in the 'old' days, manufacturers routinely inflated their HP numbers. And they often measured gross HP numbers on the engine dyno rather than net as used today. Manufacturers all use a standardised net HP measurement procedure that spells out exactly how HP must be measured on the dyno....no more gaming the system.

Shmee

7,565 posts

214 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
This thread moves too quickly for me to follow, have these pictures been posted yet?













http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/...

Jockman

17,917 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Yes they have Young Shmee.

Sorry for being dense here, but what makes people think that car to be a 4 seater confused

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
Just FYI, the new Ferrari is called the F12 Berlinetta, not the F720 smile

I'll stop being pedantic now!
That's not pedantic George, that's accurate!! Couldn't be arsed to look it up, is 720 it's power output or something?

wicz

119 posts

173 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Haven't read the whole thread but good god that car is stunning!
The rear quarter is perfect!

ChrisDB7

163 posts

156 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
I think those new pictures look awesome.

I don't know why, but for some reason that body just looks much more "Supercar" from a side view than any of the current lineup

Yazza54

18,585 posts

182 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Thats a nice jag!

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Yazza54 said:
Thats a nice jag!
Hahaha, brilliant. I mean, really... just absolutely brilliant.

I prostrate myself in front of the world's greatest living comedian etc.

Yazza54

18,585 posts

182 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
Yazza54 said:
Thats a nice jag!
Hahaha, brilliant. I mean, really... just absolutely brilliant.

I prostrate myself in front of the world's greatest living comedian etc.
Excellent.

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Yazza54 said:
Excellent.
biggrin

silverspeed

1,505 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Might have been posted elsewhere but the car was registered on 1st January as a DBS.

AMDBSNick

6,997 posts

163 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
silverspeed said:
Might have been posted elsewhere but the car was registered on 1st January as a DBS.
yes

George H

14,707 posts

165 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
That's not pedantic George, that's accurate!! Couldn't be arsed to look it up, is 720 it's power output or something?
I believe it's 740PS, or 720BHP. Serious figures for what is supposed to be a GT car. Shame it's revolting to look at (hardly a surprise considering Ferrari's offerings after the 355) smile

LukeyLikey

855 posts

148 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I started off not liking the F12 but when i saw it on YouTube video - the official Ferrari one plus some of the magazines who visited Geneva, I totally changed.

I think it looks brilliant and well ahead of the 599. Size, flow, balance, detailing all better IMO

LukeyLikey

855 posts

148 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Talking about the new DBS, I'm not sure 550 bhp, an 8 speed auto and mildly reworked interior and exterior styling (one-77 is already heavily derived from existing Astons) will be enough to compete, unless they will keep the price where it is.

I have a feeling they won't though.

I know it's not all about power but an extra 40 bhp can be had from a BR exhaust, so not exactly difficult engineering for the factory is it?

Why not build a model (new Vanquish) that is broader, lower and lighter than the existing cars (like one-77) but with 550 bhp. That would leave room for a mildly reworked DBS and a competitor to F12 that is less powerful but more overtly sporting due to weight. That might be worth £250-£300k.

A run of 250 to 500 cars over 5 years in this format must be possible? The additional cost comes mainly from lowering the weight but that is a great way for Aston to differentiate at that price point. Done well it would be an instant classic.