Bad news?

Author
Discussion

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

179 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
brakedwell said:
I can't imagine why M & M would want to build a tractor on a VH platform with carbon fibre splitters and a crystal ECU. Lets hope the Italians win the day and some sort of tie up with AMG comes about.
Don't forget M&M own Ssangyong Motor - luxury 4x4 anyone?
Good article in the FT today

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1f32bc0-3617-11e2-936c-...

mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
Neil1300R said:
Don't forget M&M own Ssangyong Motor - luxury 4x4 anyone?


I am curious what M&M think they will get out of being the minority share holder in AML confused

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

179 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
mikey k said:
I am curious what M&M think they will get out of being the minority share holder in AML confused
Global brand recognition.
In future, all press articles would say "Mahindra+Mahindra - owners of Aston Martin"
Raises their profile hugely.
Then they get access to AM VH architecture - aluminium bonding techniques, luxury car manufacturing etc.

Not agreeing with them, but can see the (failed) logic in their thought process - they did bid for Jaguar Land Rover, so they want to get into global brands, and car manufacturing in a big way.

mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
Neil1300R said:
mikey k said:
I am curious what M&M think they will get out of being the minority share holder in AML confused
Global brand recognition.
In future, all press articles would say "Mahindra+Mahindra - owners of Aston Martin"
Raises their profile hugely.
Then they get access to AM VH architecture - aluminium bonding techniques, luxury car manufacturing etc.

Not agreeing with them, but can see the (failed) logic in their thought process - they did bid for Jaguar Land Rover, so they want to get into global brands, and car manufacturing in a big way.
But as a minority share holder would they be able to plaster M&M every where and pull out technology?
I would suspect Investment DAR would prevent both of those?

mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
Does anyone know what % DAR own and how much of that stake they are looking to sell?

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

179 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Does anyone know what % DAR own and how much of that stake they are looking to sell?
The deal being discussed would see the new investors and Investment Dar keep 50:50 voting rights, but the Kuwaitis hold onto 60 per cent of the business.

steveatesh

4,900 posts

165 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
Update from Reuters:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/us-astonm...

Suggests that the deal could Be complete this week, and looks at MM being successful but questions the wisdom of MM because the author does not think any AM tech could be used by MM.

No comments from II or Dar so it could still be anybodies race. Personally I will be keeping my fingers crossed for the Italian bid because of the possibility of bringing AMG tech into the business.

DB9VolanteDriver

2,613 posts

177 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
AMG tech going into an Aston? God help us....

Best thing for AM is someone with deep pockets who will treat AM as their pinnacle brand, as opposed to MB, where AM would just be another spoke on the wheel.

Go M&M !!!!

Jon39

12,872 posts

144 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Does anyone know what % DAR own and how much of that stake they are looking to sell?
I thought I had a note of all the shareholder percentages (as at the 2007 ownership change, which at that time did include a Ford stake).

I cannot locate anything now, and no luck either with several internet searches.

Does anyone have the shareholder percentage ownership?

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
AMG tech going into an Aston? God help us....

Best thing for AM is someone with deep pockets who will treat AM as their pinnacle brand, as opposed to MB, where AM would just be another spoke on the wheel.
No-one has mooted an MB buyout - just access to AMG engines via an Industrial Venture Capitalist group who have a relationship with them. Of all the engine partners AM could have found, they'd have been my choice. Character, capacity and capability!

Have a sinking feeling that Mahindras pockets are deeper and DAR don't really care enough about the brand to be interested in who wins... They are an investment group, therefore they exist to make money, as much as possible at whatever cost.

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

179 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
Have a sinking feeling that Mahindras pockets are deeper and DAR don't really care enough about the brand to be interested in who wins... They are an investment group, therefore they exist to make money, as much as possible at whatever cost.
yes

steveatesh

4,900 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/uk-astonm...
Update article.

Well the works Union would prefer M and M too. It appears that they are doing this more for the kudos than taking tech out of AM, and if they have loads of money then good.

Is £250 million enough to develop a new engine or two?

No fat lady has sung yet of course, still wide open.


mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
Neil1300R said:
yeti said:
Have a sinking feeling that Mahindras pockets are deeper and DAR don't really care enough about the brand to be interested in who wins... They are an investment group, therefore they exist to make money, as much as possible at whatever cost.
yes
yesfrown

Jon39

12,872 posts

144 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
AMG tech going into an Aston? God help us....
Cars with Mercedes customer engines, perform better than Mercedes own cars.

(F1)


Retman

848 posts

159 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
steveatesh said:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/uk-astonm...
Update article.

Well the works Union would prefer M and M too. It appears that they are doing this more for the kudos than taking tech out of AM, and if they have loads of money then good.

Is £250 million enough to develop a new engine or two?

No fat lady has sung yet of course, still wide open.
What I have read here doesn't necessarily mean any money for AM development. It seems to me that there are no new shares being issued (if there were the proceeds would go to the company) rather it is Investment Dar which is selling part of its stake - they are said to be wanting to "recoup" some of their investment- in which case the proceeds go to Dar not AM.

Jon39

12,872 posts

144 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
····· DAR don't really care enough about the brand to be interested in who wins... They are an investment group, therefore they exist to make money, as much as possible at whatever cost.
Yes, but they won't make much out of this deal.

If, instead of investing in a sports car manufacturer in 2007, they had taken a stake in a tobacco company, it would have been double your money time now.


mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
Retman said:
steveatesh said:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/uk-astonm...
Update article.

Well the works Union would prefer M and M too. It appears that they are doing this more for the kudos than taking tech out of AM, and if they have loads of money then good.

Is £250 million enough to develop a new engine or two?

No fat lady has sung yet of course, still wide open.
What I have read here doesn't necessarily mean any money for AM development. It seems to me that there are no new shares being issued (if there were the proceeds would go to the company) rather it is Investment Dar which is selling part of its stake - they are said to be wanting to "recoup" some of their investment- in which case the proceeds go to Dar not AM.
+1 That was pointed out early on which is why I was curious about DAR's % and what portion of that they are looking to off load.

George29

14,707 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
AMG tech going into an Aston? God help us....
If they're good enough for Pagani, I'm sure they're good enough for Aston.

Now lets hope they bring the 7.3 V12 out of retirement!

DB9VolanteDriver

2,613 posts

177 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
steveatesh said:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/uk-astonm...
Update article.

Well the works Union would prefer M and M too. It appears that they are doing this more for the kudos than taking tech out of AM, and if they have loads of money then good.
A car (or other automotive related company) buying AM as a trophy is just what AM needs. People should remember that Ford bought AM for the very same reason. Once bought, they injected massive amounts of money into AM, which is still bearing fruit at AM today. Now, if Mahindra does the same, there will be a resurgence of the AM brand. When M&M gets tired of owning AM, the process can repeat.

Kinda' like having a trophy wife for a few years, spending all your money on her, and then doing it all over again when she gets a little long in the tooth....

Jon39

12,872 posts

144 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
mikey k said:
That was pointed out early on which is why I was curious about DAR's % and what portion of that they are looking to off load.
You may have read earlier in this topic, that I am hoping someone can clarify the entire shareholder percentages.

From memory I think DAR own 64%.
The rumours are suggesting a disposal, to take their holding down to about 15%.