BS Power figures .....

BS Power figures .....

Author
Discussion

Turbo T

Original Poster:

1,382 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
This used to be the curse of the Cosworth Boys, but it seems that Jap metal has fallen into this trap. Some will know I am heavily into tuning MKIV Supras. Everytime I see a car in a Magazine or on Ebay quoting XXX bhp I check the spec. Without fail the spec seems incapable of supporting the BHP. What is the reasoning behind this? Pub bragging rights?

htsd

263 posts

241 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Do you have any examples? It can be hard getting your head round the sort of power a properly sorted Jappa turbo can make. Supra engines are good for 500HP on stock internals, 1500HP fully sorted, an SR20DET (Nissan 2-litre) can make 750HP fully modified, the RB26DETT (GT-R Engine) can go to about 1350-1400 fully modified and will see 500HP without too much trouble at all. If your idea of high specific power is something like the M3 at about 100HP/L, you'd be surprised at what can be achieved.

Turbo T

Original Poster:

1,382 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
htsd said:
Do you have any examples? It can be hard getting your head round the sort of power a properly sorted Jappa turbo can make. Supra engines are good for 500HP on stock internals, 1500HP fully sorted, an SR20DET (Nissan 2-litre) can make 750HP fully modified, the RB26DETT (GT-R Engine) can go to about 1350-1400 fully modified and will see 500HP without too much trouble at all. If your idea of high specific power is something like the M3 at about 100HP/L, you'd be surprised at what can be achieved.



No I am talking about power figures that are simple unobtainable with the Mods that the car has. Not what the engines are capable of, but what they actually have bolted to them in relation to what the owners claim the bhp the car makes.

>> Edited by Turbo T on Thursday 22 September 12:18

Pulsatingstar

1,715 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
I think a lot of it is knowledge/ignorance. Im quite cynical of most things so dont take a lot of it in, but I also dont have a clue whats needed on a 2JZ/RB etc to make >500HP.

Podie

46,630 posts

276 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
I've got a guy at work who thinks his damn near stock Impreza WRX (old one) does 11.2 standing quarters, destroys GT2's and Cerbera's.... it's all bollox of course.


Yeah, that was a funny thread...

Turbo T

Original Poster:

1,382 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
I get asked all the time " how much power has that got" When I say 500-600bhp in road trim, they usually say, oh my mates gotta a xxx that is 500bhp on stock turbo/s, yeah right.

I remember having the engine from the Purple car in the back of my Pickup on the way back from the engine dyno, where it made a genuine 690bhp @ 25psi. Guy wanders over to me, says hey mate, how much power does that make. 690bhp says I, oh, hes says, my skyline is 750bhp.....

Sorry it's a pet hate of mine.

vixpy1

42,624 posts

265 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all


Yes, Believe me I understand where your coming from!

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
I think it's just people doing the old.:
Exhaust ... must be about 10hp
intake ... must be about 25hp
etc etc

They believe the e-bay adverts that say this stuff so just add them all together. They dont actually stop to think hang on a sec I might be being lied to...

_Al_

5,577 posts

259 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all


My mate here simply will not accept that my MR2 has less than 300bhp.

I'm going to need a printout signed in blood to prove otherwise to him.

Neil_H

15,323 posts

252 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
It's probably just the old "my Dad is bigger than your Dad syndrome", some people never grow up

Mr E

21,628 posts

260 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Turbo T said:
Pub bragging rights?


Pretty much spot on I'd say.

A lot of people get very disappointed at the dyno.

If I'm getting 200bhp to all 4 wheels, I'm very very happy indeed.

Turbo T

Original Poster:

1,382 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Ah, but what makes it worse is that there are certain dynos that read massively high too, so these people can get print outs too.....

Mr E

21,628 posts

260 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:

I dunno, I was hoping for 200 at the wheels and got 250! So much for 276bhp!


I have rather less engine and rather more transmission.....

vixpy1

42,624 posts

265 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Mr E said:

Gazboy said:

I dunno, I was hoping for 200 at the wheels and got 250! So much for 276bhp!



I have rather less engine and rather more transmission.....


Well, since he has an Auto box..

vixpy1

42,624 posts

265 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Turbo T said:
Ah, but what makes it worse is that there are certain dynos that read massively high too, so these people can get print outs too.....


Tell me about it

Tank Slapper

7,949 posts

284 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Turbo T said:
Ah, but what makes it worse is that there are certain dynos that read massively high too, so these people can get print outs too.....


Yes, and they often quote a calculated crank power that assumes silly transmission losses. It's funny when magazines print the actual print outs showing 180BHP at the wheels, and then a engine figure close on 100BHP higher.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

260 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Tank Slapper said:

Turbo T said:
Ah, but what makes it worse is that there are certain dynos that read massively high too, so these people can get print outs too.....



Yes, and they often quote a calculated crank power that assumes silly transmission losses. It's funny when magazines print the actual print outs showing 180BHP at the wheels, and then a engine figure close on 100BHP higher.


About right for 4wd

This craze is similar to people posting on the internet about their nurburgring lap times. My favourite recently is 8:11 in a clio 182 last weekend when it was really, really busy and according to a mate who was there about 3 yellow flags per lap - a pro race driver can do 8:49 full lap in a clio v6 255 so about 8:24 bridge to gantry on an empty track. I'm pretty sure 8:11 in a 182 is just not possible regardless of conditions!

Tank Slapper

7,949 posts

284 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:

About right for 4wd

This craze is similar to people posting on the internet about their nurburgring lap times. My favourite recently is 8:11 in a clio 182 last weekend when it was really, really busy and according to a mate who was there about 3 yellow flags per lap - a pro race driver can do 8:49 full lap in a clio v6 255 so about 8:24 bridge to gantry on an empty track. I'm pretty sure 8:11 in a 182 is just not possible regardless of conditions!


This chap has some fairly convincing arguments with regard to transmission losses.

You'd probably struggle to get that lap time on GT4

_Al_

5,577 posts

259 months

Friday 23rd September 2005
quotequote all
My housemate was talking to an American at a posh lunch last week.

The nice man was telling him at length about his race-prepped RX7 that "Laps the Nurburg ring in 3 minutes"

Turbo T

Original Poster:

1,382 posts

249 months

Friday 23rd September 2005
quotequote all
_Al_ said:
My housemate was talking to an American at a posh lunch last week.

The nice man was telling him at length about his race-prepped RX7 that "Laps the Nurburg ring in 3 minutes"




LMAO thats brilliant, god bless America....

>> Edited by Turbo T on Friday 23 September 08:26