RE: Lexus mixes power with luxury

RE: Lexus mixes power with luxury

Author
Discussion

adrian w

13,926 posts

229 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
orgasmicliving!! said:
Yes, I think some of the tricks employed on it are cheap and cheesy.

The overhangs are too long. There are all kinds of inconsistencies in the design elements and the lines barely flow together. The overlaps and scoops don't quite work and instead of making it look beautiful, they merely leave it at "interesting". There's something interesting going on in the door panels, judging by the light reflection, but it's all very symmetrical and Japanese and ultimately doesn't really make the car memorable. The sill seems to end in a razor-sharp crease and seems to have a protrusion below the car's bottom profile? What about the door line...there's something strange about how all the smooth curves collect into the sharpish corner at the bottom left. The rear roofline is nice enough, but is too balanced by the front to give the car's appearance any aggression or muscle. And the roof peaks at the wrong point and is way too high. The side-mirrors, too, had so much potential. But they lack the flair of the Testarossa's flying bridge mirror, or the high-techiness of the more recent offerings. Instead, they seem to have been placed at the minimum height necessary to be able to see over the intake at the back. Uninspiring.

It all seems to be merely adequate, rather than fantastic.

I wonder if the driving sensation will also be capable, like the Lexus, rather than fantastic, like the BMW CSL.


Edited by orgasmicliving!! on Monday 19th February 05:59


Tell you what..................dont buy one then, already in the queue

orgasmicliving!!

5,964 posts

221 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
I won't...scheduled to get my AM V8 built in October for a November delivery. Enjoy the Lexus--I am sure it will be great.

orgasmicliving!!

5,964 posts

221 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Calorus said:
stuff
If I simply wrote that I didn't like it, it would be without meaning. I tried to explain why I didn't like it. You found that to be self-contradictory gobbledygook. Fair enough. Some design professionals that I had dinner with last night, agreed with it. However, I will be the first to admit that doesn't mean much--everyone's reaction to a design is a personal thing based on their preferences/perceptions. I would love to discuss the points you raise about the 3-series vis-a-vis the market it serves, but I don't want to derail the thread.

Regardless of my reaction to the looks, I am sure it will be a solid value.

Edited by orgasmicliving!! on Monday 19th February 15:33

TheKeyboardDemon

713 posts

208 months

Tuesday 20th February 2007
quotequote all
orgasmicliving!! said:
Calorus said:
stuff
If I simply wrote that I didn't like it, it would be without meaning. I tried to explain why I didn't like it. You found that to be self-contradictory gobbledygook. Fair enough. Some design professionals that I had dinner with last night, agreed with it. However, I will be the first to admit that doesn't mean much--everyone's reaction to a design is a personal thing based on their preferences/perceptions. I would love to discuss the points you raise about the 3-series vis-a-vis the market it serves, but I don't want to derail the thread.

Regardless of my reaction to the looks, I am sure it will be a solid value.

Edited by orgasmicliving!! on Monday 19th February 15:33
I think most of the reasons you gave for disliking it are most of the reasons I do like it, I think the high mirrors and conflicting curves with lines gives it a total contrast in styles, the 2 bits that I don't like as much are the point at the front this has an oddly vertical section just below it and the shape of the door is not quite right. When I look at some parts of the car they remind me of some Italian design touches while others seem kind of reminiscent of cars like the newer Aston Martins. I find everytime I trace my eye over various lines I find it being drawn to bits I like.