2.8 litre and 193BHP???

2.8 litre and 193BHP???

Author
Discussion

baddie

Original Poster:

623 posts

218 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
Did the 2.8 six really produce the same power as the old 2.5 or was BMW being coy for the then current german tax bracket? The 328i/528i had performance well beyond that of the 2.5 litre cars that came before, and I'm not sure it can just be explained by extra torque/longer gearing (The 528i's figures were almost suspicious!)

BiggusLaddus

821 posts

232 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
The 2.8's are restricted to 193bhp by strangling them with undersized throttle bodies and the inlet manifold designed for the 2.0ltr.

The performance difference between these and the 2.5's is all about the torque. There is quite a lot more torque from the extra 300cc.

vixpy1

42,626 posts

265 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
Its a damn quick car, I'm afraid i've never done a standard one, but I would suspect 200-205bhp was more like it having driven a few.

swansea v6

1,279 posts

226 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
Get yourself to www.e36coupe.com, on there you will find out all about how and why BMW restricted the 323i and 328i engines. I believe it was because of the german tax laws being linked to power output. The 328i although having similar standard power output to the 325i has much better torque figures and when you change the inlet manifold to the non restricted one found on the 325i, plus a large bore throttle body, you instantly gain a very reliable 25-30bhp............and much improved engine.....

Edited by swansea v6 on Saturday 23 September 12:48

foz01

768 posts

264 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
I pick up a 2000 528i sport on sat but i have been told due to the double vanos you cant do this mod, annoyingly

Bodo

12,380 posts

267 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
It's most definitely not because a tax laws. In Germany, cars are taxed by engine displacement (per 100cm³. IIRC, 193PS has been a boundary for 3rd party insurances.

After introducing the 2.8l, BMW continued the 2.5l in a detuned state as 323i in order to not annoy people who bought a 325i just before. The 328i however, is MUCH torquier at low revs than the 192PS-325i!!

swansea v6

1,279 posts

226 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
never heard about not being able to do it because of having double VANOS?????

stub

6,695 posts

240 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
You can change the inlet manufold on both M52 and the TU variant.

My 2.8 has 285bhp at the moment

foz01

768 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
thats what the guy who provides the kits on e36.com e mailed me to say?!

285, that NA or forced induction

stub

6,695 posts

240 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
foz01 said:
285, that NA or forced induction


6 p.s.i. boost from a Vortech centrifugal supercharger, for the last 2 years.

swansea v6

1,279 posts

226 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
nice, bet that shifts!!!!!

rlk500

917 posts

253 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
ooooh, that would liven my tourer up a bit......

mustard

6,992 posts

246 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
mungo said:
foz01 said:
I pick up a 2000 528i sport on sat but i have been told due to the double vanos you cant do this mod, annoyingly



It doesn't have VANOS!!!


Not Soo

Early versions as fitted to E36 and early E39 didnt but later E46 & E39 versions did

www.unixnerd.demon.co.uk/enumber.html

mustard

6,992 posts

246 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
Not that I believe (same engine used today be it in 3.0cc capacity) and on makin enquires on any issues on the 2.5 version, none was the reply from trusted source

foz01

768 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th September 2006
quotequote all
so thats official then, I'm fooked when it comes to getting more grunt