Best YouTube Bike Clips?

[CoolHands]

Cbull said:

Another nutter https://www.facebook.com/orduremotor/videos/129654...

It’s just total luck. He won’t think so, but it is. Most of the time people aren’t changing lane or turning etc so whether he tries to reduce that risk or not (by looking, judging, braking etc) is totally irrelevant. It’s just blind luck that none of them are doing so while he flies by in that split second.

[Shay HTFC]

Cbull said:

Need to up my filtering game... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXC_iVYZm-0&fe...

Check out his right mirror at 1:21..

[Cbull]

Shay HTFC said:

Check out his right mirror at 1:21..

Ha great spot. People like that unfortunatly need an accident to knock'em down a peg or two.

Exactly Cool Hands, it's luck even within the speed limits.

[Biker's Nemesis]

Not bikes but I wonder if people will think what I think when they watch this.
Obviously I don't mean what a plank, thats to obvious.

http://www.thesupercarblog.com/bugatti-veyron-208-...

[Biker's Nemesis]

Ducati Desmosedici RR Re-build Project

Part 1 and 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_PILET26VE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-m1c02IA_k

[T6 vanman]

Shay HTFC said:

Cbull said:

Need to up my filtering game... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXC_iVYZm-0&fe...

Check out his right mirror at 1:21..

Could be wrong but it looks like he's running mock police blues strobing away .. especially if you look for the reflection on the car / vans when he gets bulked,

I could filter like that if I had blues flashing too

[RemyMartin81D]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G6BXRzFyD4

what do we make of this then?

I mean can't see the altercation that lead to this, but aggressive biker is being a dick and hitting the guys car( a taxi if I am seeing it right) is tttish, but old fella takes the being a to off the scale with his retort. Can imagine he is not going to be a taxi driver for much longer and probably will get a day in court for that. Criminal Damage as a minimum?

Two fking bell ends meet, always glad this sort of st happens to other people though FLOL.

feel sad to see a H2 SX smashed to fk, probably written off tbh.

Edited by RemyMartin81D on Sunday 16th September 20:12

[Zarco]

I like the old guys style. Hitting wing mirrors etc is such a bh move (usually done when there is little chance of retaliation - guess that's where this biker fked up!)

[Gavia]

I’m great at getting wound up and waving my arms around at drivers when they do the most minor of things, but that biker takes things to a new level. Totally agree with what the car driver did and can’t see how anyone can have a pop at him. Liston to what the bikers going on about “breaking his fking skull” after ttting his wing mirror. I’d have done the same.

[Gavia]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Multiple scenarios, although it’s a really weird one and not one I’ve experienced. If the driver is charged and convicted of a driving offence, then his will probably pay

If no police action then they’ll probably have to each pay for their own, although there’s an argument that the drivers car insurers could try to argue the biker should pay for it all. Not sure that’d hold up though.

There’s another argument that the damage was done deliberately by the driver, so it's coming out of his pocket, but that’s unlikely, even if he is convicted. Without a conviction, there’s zero chance of that.

[TwoStrokeNut]

All Go-Pros should be painted yellow, so we can spot these evangelistic individuals a mile away.

[Cbull]

In favour of the biker (although 2 wrong don't make a right). After the threats he was clearly walking away and the mirror was probably just knocked in rather than broke off. The guy in the car should have took note and told police of his antics rather than ran over his bike. From the biker perspective if true, the dopey man had nearly knocked him off his new brand new spangly bike, I'd be mad too and depending on how bad the consequences could have been I'd certainly let know about it.

Either way you can't be running over peoples vehicles like that, it's just mental ha ha.

Regarding insurance, if the guy was found to be at fault, would his insurance be nulled due to him purposely intending on destroying it or does insurance cover that kind of incident?

[Cbull]

Thinking about it, why wouldn't the biker include the incident he was so annoyed at?

[Gavia]

Cbull said:

In favour of the biker (although 2 wrong don't make a right). After the threats he was clearly walking away and the mirror was probably just knocked in rather than broke off. The guy in the car should have took note and told police of his antics rather than ran over his bike. From the biker perspective if true, the dopey man had nearly knocked him off his new brand new spangly bike, I'd be mad too and depending on how bad the consequences could have been I'd certainly let know about it.

Either way you can't be running over peoples vehicles like that, it's just mental ha ha.

Regarding insurance, if the guy was found to be at fault, would his insurance be nulled due to him purposely intending on destroying it or does insurance cover that kind of incident?

The poor biker, all he did was get off his bike blocking the road, walk up to the car, swear heavily at the driver, hit his car and threaten him with serious violence. Yet somehow that’s totally Ok and you come down on his side? The reaction of the car driver is arguably OTT, but he could easily say he felt threatened and feared for his own safety amd I don’t think any jury would disagree.

I think we’ve had car vs bike situations on here before and you always side with the biker no matter what they do. What would the biker have to do? Shoot the driver? Kill his family too? Launch a nuclear attack?

It’s probably a case of two wrongs not making a right, but there’s not really a side to come down on, other driver’s.

I’ve already answered the insurance question further up the thread.

[redblade]

Troy Corser and his giant balls and bike skills

https://youtu.be/llMFtQb4lLs

[CoolHands]

Love it we need more of that for knobs who think they’re hard

I particularly like the death flash of the kwacker as it’s life peters out

[Gavia]

Cbull said:

Thinking about it, why wouldn't the biker include the incident he was so annoyed at?

Because it was probably something and nothing. I’m great at getting easily wound up, but not to the extent of doing that.

[MrGman]

A lot of bikers are getting as bad as the gopro’ing cyclist mobs.

A quesstion I ask a lot these days, but why are people just so bloody angry all the time!

[Cbull]

Gavia said:

The poor biker, all he did was get off his bike blocking the road, walk up to the car, swear heavily at the driver, hit his car and threaten him with serious violence. Yet somehow that’s totally Ok and you come down on his side? The reaction of the car driver is arguably OTT, but he could easily say he felt threatened and feared for his own safety amd I don’t think any jury would disagree.

I think we’ve had car vs bike situations on here before and you always side with the biker no matter what they do. What would the biker have to do? Shoot the driver? Kill his family too? Launch a nuclear attack?

It’s probably a case of two wrongs not making a right, but there’s not really a side to come down on, other driver’s.

I’ve already answered the insurance question further up the thread.

Nope, it's not OK, did someone say it was? I was merely pointing the issue out from the bikers perspective. In this case, no-one is in the right.

The reaction of the car driver is not arguably OTT, it is insanely OTT. Yeah he was threatened in the heat of the moment but the guy was clearly walking away, any jury would see that also.

Your argument is that the biker well over reacted for in his eyes he nearly got physically knocked off the bike BUT it's fine for the driver to run over the bike if he gets shouted at and a mirror whacked for somewhat apparently being a bit of an absent minded nob by not paying attention to the road.

Yes we have had a debate before, once. It was about a nob biker and an even bigger nob of a police officer.

You're right, I do tend to stick up for bikers. Being both a biker and a driver do you wonder why?

Nevertheless, without starting a big stupid back and forth debate, I hope we're both in agreement that both driver and biker in this case are both nobs in their own right

[Gavia]

Cbull said:

Nope, it's not OK, did someone say it was? I was merely pointing the issue out from the bikers perspective. In this case, no-one is in the right.

The reaction of the car driver is not arguably OTT, it is insanely OTT. Yeah he was threatened in the heat of the moment but the guy was clearly walking away, any jury would see that also.

Your argument is that the biker well over reacted for in his eyes he nearly got physically knocked off the bike BUT it's fine for the driver to run over the bike if he gets shouted at and a mirror whacked for somewhat apparently being a bit of an absent minded nob by not paying attention to the road.

Yes we have had a debate before, once. It was about a nob biker and an even bigger nob of a police officer.

You're right, I do tend to stick up for bikers. Being both a biker and a driver do you wonder why?

Nevertheless, without starting a big stupid back and forth debate, I hope we're both in agreement that both driver and biker in this case are both nobs in their own right

As I said, two wrongs don’t make a right. However, my lack of sympathy for the biker is simply down to his threatening to “break his skull”, that’s pretty violent as far as threats go and the driver goes for it straight after that. The driver did over react too, but no more than would be justifiable. How does the driver know he’s not going back to get a weapon, especially after he’s just punched his car? Would you wait to see if you were being threatened on the street, or make a quick getaway? “Running over the bike was to prevent him chasing me down and killing me”. That would be sufficient doubt raised.