Why I'll never take a bike to the ring...

Why I'll never take a bike to the ring...

Author
Discussion

monthefish

Original Poster:

20,445 posts

232 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo

black-k1

11,953 posts

230 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!

thetrash

1,847 posts

207 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!
Legitimate overtake nono! The car went for the apex and was in front of the bike. The bike had a better view of what was happening and should have used a little common sense to wait and then blast past on the next straightish section. Would you have the same opinion if it was another bike in place of the BMW?

black-k1

11,953 posts

230 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
thetrash said:
black-k1 said:
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!
Legitimate overtake nono! The car went for the apex and was in front of the bike. The bike had a better view of what was happening and should have used a little common sense to wait and then blast past on the next straightish section. Would you have the same opinion if it was another bike in place of the BMW?
Yes, I would have exactly the same opinion. Remember to judge using road traffic law. There was no legitimate reason for the slower vehicle to move from the right side of the road and, as with all changes in road position, you should only do this if it is clear to do so.

On public days, the ‘Ring is NOT A TRACK, it’s a one way, de-restricted toll ROAD. The car drove it as though it were a track and, in the process, took out another road user.

FourWheelDrift

88,633 posts

285 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
Ring guide said:
The ring is a public road and abides by the road traffic laws of Germany. When overtaking indicate left to signify the vehicle then when its safe to do, pass. Always look to see what the vehicle in front is doing, remember most people will take the racing line, however its a public road so buses and MPVs are also allowed on the ring at the same time as you, so people may take any line into a corner. Pick your time and pass within your limits. Remember this is not a race. When been overtaken, indicate to the right and move right.
It is a public road but it is also a one way road so vehicles can take any line they like into a corner, as above, it is the vehicle overtaking that is the one that should be careful and overtake only when it is safe to do so.

Mr Noble

6,535 posts

234 months

Monday 3rd March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
There was no legitimate reason for the slower vehicle to move from the right side of the road........
....other than that being how you take a corner on a race track. The ring may well be a public road but it is also a single direction track and as such, cars will start out wide, turn it tight and clip the apex on every corner if they know what they are doing. A well learned biker would know not to undertake a car heading onto a roundabout for the exact same reason as this, let alone doing it on a track. 100% biker fault I'm afraid to say. (IMO) frown


y2blade

56,141 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
thetrash said:
black-k1 said:
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!
Legitimate overtake nono! The car went for the apex and was in front of the bike. The bike had a better view of what was happening and should have used a little common sense to wait and then blast past on the next straightish section. Would you have the same opinion if it was another bike in place of the BMW?
Mr Noble said:
black-k1 said:
There was no legitimate reason for the slower vehicle to move from the right side of the road........
....other than that being how you take a corner on a race track. The ring may well be a public road but it is also a single direction track and as such, cars will start out wide, turn it tight and clip the apex on every corner if they know what they are doing. A well learned biker would know not to undertake a car heading onto a roundabout for the exact same reason as this, let alone doing it on a track. 100% biker fault I'm afraid to say. (IMO) frown
the biker was at fault 100%..anyone with any sense would have seen what was happening...the bike could have waited a couple of seconds then blasted the big lardy BMW on the next straight

looks to me as if the biker was rushing to keep with the other bike in shot

i personaly wouldnt have passed there UNLESS the car had indicated right to acknowledge that he had seen me and was staying wide for me to pass

i hope that the rider wasnt badly hurt and that he has learnt from it





black-k1

11,953 posts

230 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
y2blade said:
thetrash said:
black-k1 said:
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!
Legitimate overtake nono! The car went for the apex and was in front of the bike. The bike had a better view of what was happening and should have used a little common sense to wait and then blast past on the next straightish section. Would you have the same opinion if it was another bike in place of the BMW?
Mr Noble said:
black-k1 said:
There was no legitimate reason for the slower vehicle to move from the right side of the road........
....other than that being how you take a corner on a race track. The ring may well be a public road but it is also a single direction track and as such, cars will start out wide, turn it tight and clip the apex on every corner if they know what they are doing. A well learned biker would know not to undertake a car heading onto a roundabout for the exact same reason as this, let alone doing it on a track. 100% biker fault I'm afraid to say. (IMO) frown
the biker was at fault 100%..anyone with any sense would have seen what was happening...the bike could have waited a couple of seconds then blasted the big lardy BMW on the next straight

looks to me as if the biker was rushing to keep with the other bike in shot

i personaly wouldnt have passed there UNLESS the car had indicated right to acknowledge that he had seen me and was staying wide for me to pass

i hope that the rider wasnt badly hurt and that he has learnt from it
This is what makes the ring so dangerous - people who don’t know the rules and try and ‘pass judgement’ on what they feel should be right.

Check out:

http://www.nurburgring.org.uk/ringrules.html

In particular, rule 2.3 reads:

3) Vehicles must drive on the right, in particular when overtaken, on crests, in bends or in case of breakdown.

If the bike rider had been concentrating better he should have expected the car to do what it did but the car is in the wrong!


Edited by black-k1 on Tuesday 4th March 08:16

slim_boy_fat

735 posts

240 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
This is what makes the ring so dangerous - people who don’t know the rules and try and ‘pass judgement’ on what they feel should be right.

Check out:

http://www.nurburgring.org.uk/ringrules.html

In particular, rule 2.3 reads:

3) Vehicles must drive on the right, in particular when overtaken, on crests, in bends or in case of breakdown.

If the bike rider had been concentrating better he should have expected the car to do what it did but the car is in the wrong!
Spot on, thats exactly what make the ring dangerous.

The car driver caused the accident. Simple as that.

The biker could have prevented it by anticipating what the car driver was going to do.

I bet both had stopwatches and were trying to beat a time.

Silly boys.

The car driver should be banned from the ring. I think the biker will have learned his lesson.


y2blade

56,141 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
y2blade said:
thetrash said:
black-k1 said:
hornetrider said:
Rider culpable there I'm afraid, accelerated into the back of a car turning in. Maybe the car should have spotted him but that was an unnecessary risk imo
Probably not the case at the 'Ring. It's a public road and road, not track, rules apply. The bike was in the process of a legitimate overtake when the car pulled across in front of him. Cars fault - not that it will make the biker any less damaged!
Legitimate overtake nono! The car went for the apex and was in front of the bike. The bike had a better view of what was happening and should have used a little common sense to wait and then blast past on the next straightish section. Would you have the same opinion if it was another bike in place of the BMW?
Mr Noble said:
black-k1 said:
There was no legitimate reason for the slower vehicle to move from the right side of the road........
....other than that being how you take a corner on a race track. The ring may well be a public road but it is also a single direction track and as such, cars will start out wide, turn it tight and clip the apex on every corner if they know what they are doing. A well learned biker would know not to undertake a car heading onto a roundabout for the exact same reason as this, let alone doing it on a track. 100% biker fault I'm afraid to say. (IMO) frown
the biker was at fault 100%..anyone with any sense would have seen what was happening...the bike could have waited a couple of seconds then blasted the big lardy BMW on the next straight

looks to me as if the biker was rushing to keep with the other bike in shot

i personaly wouldnt have passed there UNLESS the car had indicated right to acknowledge that he had seen me and was staying wide for me to pass

i hope that the rider wasnt badly hurt and that he has learnt from it
This is what makes the ring so dangerous - people who don’t know the rules and try and ‘pass judgement’ on what they feel should be right.

Check out:

http://www.nurburgring.org.uk/ringrules.html

In particular, rule 2.3 reads:

3) Vehicles must drive on the right, in particular when overtaken, on crests, in bends or in case of breakdown.

If the bike rider had been concentrating better he should have expected the car to do what it did but the car is in the wrong!


Edited by black-k1 on Tuesday 4th March 08:16
i know what "the rules are"

but i still wouldnt have gone under that BMW on the way into a left hander!!!! call it gut instinct
whoever was right or wrong the biker has learnt a valuable lesson


expect the unexpected and assume everyone is out to get you

its what i was taught while learning to ride

black-k1

11,953 posts

230 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
As with all situations in motorcycling, the biker has to make allowances for the stupidity of others as it will generally always be the biker who pays, regardless of fault.

y2blade

56,141 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
As with all situations in motorcycling, the biker has to make allowances for the stupidity of others as it will generally always be the biker who pays, regardless of fault.
well said....its no good "being in the right" when your bikes smashed up and you're in pain

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
Track,toll road, call it what you like personally I wouldn't have tried the pass there unless the car had indicated he had seen me, never mind who was in the right,I bet the biker wouldn't again either.

black-k1

11,953 posts

230 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
I must admit to being very surprised by the response to this post by members of a bikers forum. A biker, who is correctly following the law ends up getting wiped out due to a car driver who is breaking the law. The only mistake the biker made is to not anticipate what the car driver might do and yet most of the responses have been along the lines of ‘the biker will know better next time’.

While I do not hold with a ‘blame culture’ I am surprised that there has only been one other response suggesting that the car driver was wrong and that the result was a very unfortunate accident for a biker.

To the biker in the video – you have my deepest sympathy mate and I hope you make sure that the car driver pays for all damage done to you and your bike.

y2blade

56,141 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
I must admit to being very surprised by the response to this post by members of a bikers forum. A biker, who is correctly following the law ends up getting wiped out due to a car driver who is breaking the law. The only mistake the biker made is to not anticipate what the car driver might do and yet most of the responses have been along the lines of ‘the biker will know better next time’.

While I do not hold with a ‘blame culture’ I am surprised that there has only been one other response suggesting that the car driver was wrong and that the result was a very unfortunate accident for a biker.

To the biker in the video – you have my deepest sympathy mate and I hope you make sure that the car driver pays for all damage done to you and your bike.
like i said earlyer

"anyone with any sense would have seen what was happening...the bike could have waited a couple of seconds then blasted the big lardy BMW on the next straight

looks to me as if the biker was rushing to keep with the other bike in shot

i personaly wouldnt have passed there UNLESS the car had indicated right to acknowledge that he had seen me and was staying wide for me to pass

i hope that the rider wasnt badly hurt and that he has learnt from it"

AlexHancock

466 posts

269 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
I drive the 'ring but I'm not keen to ride it. Bikes are very hard to spot and move around a lot more on the 'ring than they would on a normal road - so even if you do know they are there it's hard to judge what they're going to do. If the car/bike positions were reversed I would have expected the bike to turn in without seeing me so would have back off. Almost no one uses the 'ring like a road!

ALso, if I was on the bike I would rather have gone into the side/back of the car...

GreenV8S

30,231 posts

285 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
Under those circumstances I would expect most cars to take the racing line through most corners. It seems very foolish to me to risk your life on the assumption that they won't. It may be that the circuit rules say they're in the wrong, but that won't be any consolation to your next of kin.

y2blade

56,141 posts

216 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
Under those circumstances I would expect most cars to take the racing line through most corners. It seems very foolish to me to risk your life on the assumption that they won't. It may be that the circuit rules say they're in the wrong, but that won't be any consolation to your next of kin.
very well said

Hyperion

15,279 posts

201 months

Tuesday 4th March 2008
quotequote all
The biker should have known better...BMW drivers should always be given a wide berth.