Discussion
james said:
Assuming that you lot are talking about the thing inside the car, it's interior. This is assuming that you're attempting to type in English.
If you're actually using a different language, I appologise. Otherwise, buy a dictionary.
That's a bit harsh isn't it James? No need to loose it now
pikey said:
Assuming that you lot are talking about the thing inside the car, it's interior. This is assuming that you're attempting to type in English.
If you're actually using a different language, I appologise. Otherwise, buy a dictionary.
That's a bit harsh isn't it James? No need to loose it now
James is just sharing the benefits of his ejucayshun. It was a bit to harsh though.
dans said:
Apparently the new 'bling' spelling James. Interia (sic) is more street as befits the MG.
It is a nice enough looking car IMHO the inside is a million times better than the old crackle finish dash of yore and given its age they have done a good job with the outside, throw in free insurance and it will be wheelspinning about in carparks accross the land shortly...
Silly me. I hadn't noticed. It was the lack of the words "innit", "spec" and "wikkid" made me think that it was a normal discussion about a new model. Now I realise that they weren't using English after all, but some Max Power dialect.
james said:
Apparently the new 'bling' spelling James. Interia (sic) is more street as befits the MG.
It is a nice enough looking car IMHO the inside is a million times better than the old crackle finish dash of yore and given its age they have done a good job with the outside, throw in free insurance and it will be wheelspinning about in carparks accross the land shortly...
Silly me. I hadn't noticed. It was the lack of the words "innit", "spec" and "wikkid" made me think that it was a normal discussion about a new model. Now I realise that they weren't using English after all, but some Max Power dialect.
Christ, you lot are getting on your high horses about one spelling mistake and then coming to the conclusion that I'm some spotty 18 year old Max Power reader when I'm not.
Sorry but I was in a hurry before when I was typing that last post and I just copied the work "interia" from the previous post without thinking. I know spelling is not my strongest point but I normally know how to spell interior - honestly I do!!!
Anyway must go!
Bye for now!
Bling! Pukka! Mint! Init!
). 
It's FWD, no major mechanical changes....apparantly the side gills are only meant to be on the 180 (KV6)....and the body kit is only standard on the 180 too.
As for the boot...yep it's not to my taste, but I believe the spoiler will still be an option rather than that boot lip jobby.
As for the person that posted saying that they thought the ZS was based on the 5dr hatch previously....no..you got it in 4dr saloon or 5dr hatch. And you still will after this facelift.
Interior isn't up to scratch of the competition...but a heck of a lot better than it was. The old interior was exactly the same as an old 1996 400gsi I had...but in a different colour.
Andy.
As for the boot...yep it's not to my taste, but I believe the spoiler will still be an option rather than that boot lip jobby.
As for the person that posted saying that they thought the ZS was based on the 5dr hatch previously....no..you got it in 4dr saloon or 5dr hatch. And you still will after this facelift.
Interior isn't up to scratch of the competition...but a heck of a lot better than it was. The old interior was exactly the same as an old 1996 400gsi I had...but in a different colour.
Andy.
gorrieman said:
Interior isn't up to scratch of the competition...but a heck of a lot better than it was.
Given that the 45 or ZS are supposed to be replaced by an all new car at the end of 2005, then I think the interior (or should that be interia??) is a good effort considering it's short life expectancy. It definitely looks better and more modern that the old interior!!!
Sorry MG!Gassing Station | MG | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff