Early Precat Fuel sender unit

Early Precat Fuel sender unit

Author
Discussion

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Thursday 9th January 2020
quotequote all
The early cars had the sensor in the LH side of the tank and not as it says in the bible on the top RH side as later cars.

Anyway mine is in the side and it aint going to be easy getting to it to reseal as it's weeping a bit.



Some of the fixings are inaccessible so I'm hoping somebody may have done it without removing the tank completely.

cool

Edit.....
Original post refered to the early cars having "S" series fuel tanks, this is not the caseshoot




Edited by lancepar on Saturday 11th January 14:29

phillpot

17,116 posts

183 months

Thursday 9th January 2020
quotequote all
lancepar said:
I'm hoping somebody may have done it without removing the tank completely.
Probably the bloke who did it last time, that's why it's leaking wink

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Thursday 9th January 2020
quotequote all
The smell is only half as bad when the tank is half full and with an air freshener in the boot hardly noticeablelaugh

Trouble is they don't go very far on half a tankmad

cool

BIG DUNC

1,918 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th January 2020
quotequote all
I think if you remove the filling pipe and release the tank straps, you should be able to tilt the tank aft so you can access the sender without removing the pipes at the bottom.

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Friday 10th January 2020
quotequote all
Yes Duncan I'm thinking the same.

Wish they had put the sender on the RH side then unstrapping and twisting the tank would work. Good old TVRmad

Lance

cool

BIG DUNC

1,918 posts

223 months

Friday 10th January 2020
quotequote all
I have a new sender unit which I haven’t fitted yet, but have had a good look at this as I hope to fit it soon.

Griffo400

132 posts

125 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
I had to take my tank out to replace the sender unit. This I what it looks like if you do.


lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
Hi Brian,

I'd be interested to hear how you went about resealing it, what sealant etc?

Got any photos of the parts when you took them from the tank?


Cheers
Lance

cool


lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
Is this what the sender looks like ?



cool

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Sunday 12th January 2020
quotequote all
With the carpet and years of old foam removed finally exposes the jubilee clips.



Going to remove the top section and the filler itself and see if the tank will move a bit with the straps released..

cool

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Monday 20th January 2020
quotequote all
Well Duncan it looks like you suggestion will work.

With the straps and the filler neck hose removed the tank does tilt a large amount and although not tried probably allow access to the sender fixings.


I didn't fancy trying to remove the filler as it was well and truly stuck to the body so I cut the thick walled hose between the filler and section of neck with the breather pipe stub, the pipe on this goes to this unit behind the tank fixed to the rear bulkhead.


Going to use some of this to join the filler neck on reassembly.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/311974176570

Oh and I found some Blue Hylomar gasket sealant, seems like that others have found this to do the trick.

cool






Teamred

31 posts

61 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2020
quotequote all
I've just done this same job. I used Stag Wellseal which is superb stuff and doesn't set hard like Hylomar does. Interesting that the neck on my tank is shorter than the one pictured, ie my tank is taller. Must be a larger capacity I guess. If you have taken the tank out replace the rubber flow and return hoses too.

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2020
quotequote all
Teamred said:
I've just done this same job. I used Stag Wellseal which is superb stuff and doesn't set hard like Hylomar does. Interesting that the neck on my tank is shorter than the one pictured, ie my tank is taller. Must be a larger capacity I guess. If you have taken the tank out replace the rubber flow and return hoses too.
Wow Stag Wellseal that brings back memories.
Blue Hylomar is a plastic based compound "Resistant to Petroleum Products" that also doesn't set hard either and like Wellseal is a bugger to remove.

My '92 Griffith is a very early one and the short alloy neck doesn't have the breather stub on it. Instead there is a steel tube with a breather pipe stub in between the filler and the tank therefore two hoses. Don't think there is any difference in the capacity. And there is room to slide a new hose down and then up to close the gap.

Tank is not coming out just tilting it enough to get at the side mounted sender and reseal it.

Cheers

cool









Edited by lancepar on Wednesday 22 January 21:05

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Thursday 23rd January 2020
quotequote all
Well I wasn't expecting that, the outlet from the tank is completely different to my '95 Chim as in there is enough flexible pipe and wiring to pull the tank back to clear the wheel arches and then slide it to the RH of the boot.



Thus making access to the sender fixings much easier, however the two lower fixings were more than screwdriver tight so I've sprayed them with my penetrating fluid mix of 50/50 Acetone and ATF, usually does the trick.



As the photo shows, leaking fuel has washed the tank below it clean and evidence of where it has settled on the boot floorcan be seen in the other photo.

That Zinc coloured ring has me confused, as I can't see its purpose and looks like the earlier models twist to lock/unlock method of securing the sender but round the wrong way!!!
Or have I got it wrong and that is what holds the sender in place so what does the ring of screws do?

cool

Edited by lancepar on Thursday 23 January 15:51


Edited by lancepar on Thursday 23 January 15:52

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Thursday 23rd January 2020
quotequote all
The mist is clearing at last.

I need a new locking ring and seal don't I?

Nothing special by the looks of it and when I get that mangled ring out I'll pop over to David Manners Parts or a Local 4x4 centre and get sorted.

cool

Teamred

31 posts

61 months

Friday 24th January 2020
quotequote all
Is your tank outlet directly below the sender on the side of the tank then? Mine is on the inside face adjacent to the bulkhead. I don't see the point of the locking ring as you say. I left it alone and replaced the gasket underneath it - with my favoured Wellseal!

lancepar

Original Poster:

1,018 posts

172 months

Friday 24th January 2020
quotequote all
Teamred said:
Is your tank outlet directly below the sender on the side of the tank then? Mine is on the inside face adjacent to the bulkhead. I don't see the point of the locking ring as you say. I left it alone and replaced the gasket underneath it - with my favoured Wellseal!
Firstly, yes the tank outlet is directly below the sender on the side of the tank as can be seen in the photo above showing the tank moved from its seated position. It's completely different from any Griff/Chim tank I've seen photos of. And I did put a tank back into my old Chim'.

Next, the alloy ring secured to the tank with the six screws is what the locking ring locks into and doesn't need to be disturbed.

To reassemble.
After fitting the seal between the sender and the tank the locking ring is inserted and turned so it locks into the alloy ring.
This is easily done with a special tool that engages with the tangs on the Locking ring, which can be seen bent on mine.
However most will probably use a Brummagem screwdriver (Hammer) and a drift and gently tap the ring round until tight.
I will use some sealant as belt and braces.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/range-rover-classic-fue...

cool