Any Chinese importers here? Tax Implications

Any Chinese importers here? Tax Implications

Author
Discussion

ATV

Original Poster:

556 posts

196 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Anyone see the Sunday Times article yesterday about the guys importing from China and getting hammered by their Amazon and eBay competitors not paying the VAT?

The article is behind a paywall (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/ireland/are-amazon-and-ebay-the-villains-of-vat-nbq6zwkl6) but the gist was that guys like these https://www.tv-village.net are at a 20% worse off situation because their Chinese competitors don't pay tax.

One thought which occurred to me was why not setup a company in let's say Netherlands to receive the goods. This company could then invoice UK customers only and avoid having to pay VAT. Returns and customer service could be handled by a UK office. You could have a clause in your Dutch company that you will only sell to UK customers and not Dutch ones, thereby avoiding domestic VAT issues.

If the turnover is good enough (£800k in this case), it could be worth the hassle of a one-time setup.

(unless of course HMRC have already thought of this and banned it)

What do you guys thinks?

ymwoods

2,178 posts

178 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
My understanding was this is possible, but not quite as easy as your thinking. Surely if it was, everyone would do it?

essayer

9,085 posts

195 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
But Dutch VAT is 21% confused

jbswagger

734 posts

202 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Why would your Dutch company not have to charge UK customer VAT?

Super Slo Mo

5,368 posts

199 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
The only way it would work is if you were selling to U.K. VAT registered companies, then to don't need to charge them VAT.
Normal 'domestic' retail sales have to be charged VAT at whichever rate is applicable in the country that the selling business is based in.

I have had this exact same issue. Bought a load of stock off a Chinese supplier, who then started marketing online without the vat. For me to be competitive pretty much wiped out the already tight margins, especially after eBay and/or Amazon had taken their cut.
I gave up in the end, and then was approached by the same companies offering exclusivity to the uk market, and claiming they wouldn't try to sell direct. I haven't bothered.

ATV

Original Poster:

556 posts

196 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
essayer said:
But Dutch VAT is 21% confused
You would specify that your products are only available to UK customers (and prices only in GBP) thereby negating the need to pay Dutch VAT on your imports.

I remember reading back in the day that Play24/7.com (later renamed play.com) used this wheeze by having their warehouse based in one of the Channel Islands (I think Jersey).

I used to buy all my DVDs/CDs from them instead of Amazon because they were always cheaper. It was because of their VAT liability issue made them significantly cheaper.

ATV

Original Poster:

556 posts

196 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
essayer said:
But Dutch VAT is 21% confused
You would specify that your products are only available to UK customers (and prices only in GBP) thereby negating the need to pay Dutch VAT on your imports.

I remember reading back in the day that Play24/7.com (later renamed play.com) used this wheeze by having their warehouse based in one of the Channel Islands (I think Jersey).

I used to buy all my DVDs/CDs from them instead of Amazon because they were always cheaper. It was because of their VAT liability issue made them significantly cheaper.


Edited by ATV on Thursday 21st September 20:32

essayer

9,085 posts

195 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
But your company would need to pay the 21% on imports from China wouldn't it? Even with OSR you'd still need to pay the VAT in the UK?

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
There is some form of VAT exemption for small items below a certain value - definitely not TVs and the like.


sgrimshaw

7,335 posts

251 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
ATV said:
You would specify that your products are only available to UK customers (and prices only in GBP) thereby negating the need to pay Dutch VAT on your imports.
It doesn't work like that.

Your "Dutch" company would pay VAT at the point of entry to the EU regardless of who they intended to sell them to.

Sales to UK Customers (other than to UK VAT Registered businesses) would be subject to Dutch VAT at 21% ... so you'd actually make your sales price higher to UK consumers by 1%

RM

593 posts

98 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
ATV said:
I remember reading back in the day that Play24/7.com (later renamed play.com) used this wheeze by having their warehouse based in one of the Channel Islands (I think Jersey).

I used to buy all my DVDs/CDs from them instead of Amazon because they were always cheaper. It was because of their VAT liability issue made them significantly cheaper.
That was a different wheeze called Low Value Consignment Relief. Anything under £18 or so from the Channel Islands didn't attract VAT. The Govt closed that in 2012.

Your idea doesn't work.

skwdenyer

16,548 posts

241 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
Your idea works for services. Do as Google have done and declare all AdWords customers to be businesses (even if they are not), then simply stop charging VAT.

Why so great? Because in Ireland (say), you declare the sales as business purposes (no need for the other side to be VAT registered for that to work), and so you say "VAT is subject to reverse charge - customer pays." UK SME customer under VAT threshold doesn't have to pay this (although there's an edge-case gotcha around reverse charge purchases contributing to VAT threshold calcs), so is effectively buying VAT-free.

UK supplier selling to the same UK (non VAT-registered) businesses has to charge 20% UK VAT, so cannot hope to compete.

In terms of goods, the VAT *should* be paid by the customer of the Chinese company at the border, except that it doesn't work like that and the VAT is never paid.

Why don't you set up in a non-EU country and try it that way?

RM

593 posts

98 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Your idea works for services. Do as Google have done and declare all AdWords customers to be businesses (even if they are not), then simply stop charging VAT.

Why so great? Because in Ireland (say), you declare the sales as business purposes (no need for the other side to be VAT registered for that to work), and so you say "VAT is subject to reverse charge - customer pays." UK SME customer under VAT threshold doesn't have to pay this (although there's an edge-case gotcha around reverse charge purchases contributing to VAT threshold calcs), so is effectively buying VAT-free.
VAT is only reverse charged if the customer is VAT registered. If not, Google simply charges the VAT.

skwdenyer

16,548 posts

241 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
RM said:
skwdenyer said:
Your idea works for services. Do as Google have done and declare all AdWords customers to be businesses (even if they are not), then simply stop charging VAT.

Why so great? Because in Ireland (say), you declare the sales as business purposes (no need for the other side to be VAT registered for that to work), and so you say "VAT is subject to reverse charge - customer pays." UK SME customer under VAT threshold doesn't have to pay this (although there's an edge-case gotcha around reverse charge purchases contributing to VAT threshold calcs), so is effectively buying VAT-free.
VAT is only reverse charged if the customer is VAT registered. If not, Google simply charges the VAT.
No, Google doesn't. Look at this: http://www.taylorcocks.co.uk/services/tax/vat/adwo... for instance.

No VAT charged to a non-VAT-registered UK business.

RM

593 posts

98 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
No, Google doesn't. Look at this: http://www.taylorcocks.co.uk/services/tax/vat/adwo... and [url]/url] for instance.

No VAT charged to a non-VAT-registered UK business.
Both links refer to a VAT ID. I can assure you they do apply VAT. Been there, done that. Give AdWords your VAT reg number, VAT doesn't appear in the invoice. Don't give them one, and VAT appears. HMRC insist B2B suppliers confirm a VAT reg number of the customer before they reverse charge. It's an EU wide ruling.

skwdenyer

16,548 posts

241 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
RM said:
skwdenyer said:
No, Google doesn't. Look at this: http://www.taylorcocks.co.uk/services/tax/vat/adwo... and [url]/url] for instance.

No VAT charged to a non-VAT-registered UK business.
Both links refer to a VAT ID. I can assure you they do apply VAT. Been there, done that. Give AdWords your VAT reg number, VAT doesn't appear in the invoice. Don't give them one, and VAT appears. HMRC insist B2B suppliers confirm a VAT reg number of the customer before they reverse charge. It's an EU wide ruling.
I can assure you that I receive invoices from Google and Yelp (for instance) that have no VAT on them (in fact state VAT is 0%), and I have not provided them with a VAT ID as I am not VAT-registered (my property interests are a sole-tradership, and are not opted to tax).

A VAT ID is prima-face evidence of a business use, but all that is required in law is evidence of business use (a declaration by the customer will suffice). This is not the same as for physical product.

From the second link above:

Brighton Accountants said:
Business is NOT registered for VAT in the UK

If the business cannot supply a VAT registration number, Google might consider that the advertising is being used for non-business purposes, and charge Irish VAT at 21%. The UK business cannot reclaim this by a direct claim to the Irish tax authorities. To avoid this happening, the business should contact Google to get the account status changed to ‘business’. This should also generate a refund from Google of any past VAT that has been incorrectly charged.

The value of the AdWords expense will need to be included in the turnover of the UK business in determining whether it needs to register for VAT.
Google and Yelp (for instance) simply state that the use is business. Google makes it a condition of using AdWords - if you are not a business, you may not use AdWords. Yelp's contract does the same.

In each case, therefore, Google and Yelp can undercut a UK supplier of the same service to below-threshold businesses.

Since SMEs / micro-businesses make up a fair proportion of the customer base of both, that's quite an impact. In countries where VAT thresholds are much lower, the distortion is not apparent.

cheekymeerkat

154 posts

82 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
I'm not sure how they get away with it with big ticket items, but with smaller, low value product, you will often find Chinese merchants importing the products as 'parcels' in to the UK, all to the same address (often a fulfilment house).
When I say parcels, I don't mean airmail. I mean they will load a container or airpallet with thousands of pre-polybagged items with nothing more than barcode on the poly bag to identify the product.
For customs purposes, the company and contents will be declared as incoming mail/mail forwarding services for onward shipment, and each parcel will be declared under £15 or so, and therefore avoid VAT.
Of course all of the 'parcels' end up at the same address (fulfilment house) and the goods are therefore imported without paying VAT.

jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
Personally I don't think vat is part of the problem.
Staff wages
Auto enrollment
Business rates
Electricity
Gas
Transportation

Etc etc is alot different to your typical Chinese business.

skwdenyer

16,548 posts

241 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
jamoor said:
Personally I don't think vat is part of the problem.
Staff wages
Auto enrollment
Business rates
Electricity
Gas
Transportation

Etc etc is alot different to your typical Chinese business.
Possibly. But VAT is an extra 20% on top smile

skwdenyer

16,548 posts

241 months

Monday 25th September 2017
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
RM said:
skwdenyer said:
No, Google doesn't. Look at this: http://www.taylorcocks.co.uk/services/tax/vat/adwo... and [url]/url] for instance.

No VAT charged to a non-VAT-registered UK business.
Both links refer to a VAT ID. I can assure you they do apply VAT. Been there, done that. Give AdWords your VAT reg number, VAT doesn't appear in the invoice. Don't give them one, and VAT appears. HMRC insist B2B suppliers confirm a VAT reg number of the customer before they reverse charge. It's an EU wide ruling.
I can assure you that I receive invoices from Google and Yelp (for instance) that have no VAT on them (in fact state VAT is 0%), and I have not provided them with a VAT ID as I am not VAT-registered (my property interests are a sole-tradership, and are not opted to tax).

A VAT ID is prima-face evidence of a business use, but all that is required in law is evidence of business use (a declaration by the customer will suffice). This is not the same as for physical product.

From the second link above:

Brighton Accountants said:
Business is NOT registered for VAT in the UK

If the business cannot supply a VAT registration number, Google might consider that the advertising is being used for non-business purposes, and charge Irish VAT at 21%. The UK business cannot reclaim this by a direct claim to the Irish tax authorities. To avoid this happening, the business should contact Google to get the account status changed to ‘business’. This should also generate a refund from Google of any past VAT that has been incorrectly charged.

The value of the AdWords expense will need to be included in the turnover of the UK business in determining whether it needs to register for VAT.
Google and Yelp (for instance) simply state that the use is business. Google makes it a condition of using AdWords - if you are not a business, you may not use AdWords. Yelp's contract does the same.

In each case, therefore, Google and Yelp can undercut a UK supplier of the same service to below-threshold businesses.

Since SMEs / micro-businesses make up a fair proportion of the customer base of both, that's quite an impact. In countries where VAT thresholds are much lower, the distortion is not apparent.
To update this, this from HMRC (regarding services supplied to other EU countries):
HMRC Notice 741a said:
Where the B2B rule applies you should obtain commercial evidence showing that your customer is in business and belongs outside the UK. VAT registration numbers are the best evidence that your EU customer is in business. If your customer is unable to provide a VAT number you can accept alternative evidence. This includes certificates from fiscal authorities or other commercial documents indicating the nature of the customer’s activities in their home country. Such evidence should be kept as part of your records.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vat-not.... VAT number is only one means of establishing that the supply is B2B.