Which anti-virus?

Author
Discussion

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

251 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
Prompted by this I just saw in another thread;

ThePassenger said:
I'd also make sure you're running some decent, non-flaky anti-virus (i.e. NOT running Symantic/Norton/McAfee home products).
I'm running McAfee Home Edition (think that's what it's called), and now and then the computer runs a tad slow for a few seconds while it sorts itself out.

Decent spec computer (2gb DDR ram) with very little in the way of programs on it; it was brand new a month or so ago so all that's really on it is some Adobe software and ITunes!

Anyway, McAfee is quite system sapping...so what one to go for?!

ThePassenger

6,962 posts

236 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
nod32, AVG-Free, ClamAV (it does have a Windows version). Much more primitive frontends and less overheads.

Mike_Ibizacupra

195 posts

204 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
AVG is an awesome bit of free kit biggrin

roadsweeper

3,786 posts

275 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
Kaspersky is definitely worth a look.

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

251 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
Fantastic, thanks biggrin

mph999

2,718 posts

221 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
Nod32 is still the daddy though ...

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
roadsweeper said:
Kaspersky is definitely worth a look.
yes

hutchingsp

51,894 posts

211 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
I'm currently up to my eyeballs digging around on Antivirus.

Admittedly I'm looking for an Enterprise solution so remote management plays a big part, but it's hard to get past NOD32 and Kaspersky as being the frontrunners.

Kaspersky arguably does more, NOD32 is almost certainly less resource hungry.

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
AVG I find a bit rubbish, it sniffs out viruses but I've also had a lot of false positives, and feck me is it slow, takes an hour to scan 300GB on my computer.
I'm using Avast at the minute, not bad, but kaspersky seems much better.

Hut49

3,544 posts

263 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
Stu R said:
AVG I find a bit rubbish, it sniffs out viruses but I've also had a lot of false positives, and feck me is it slow, takes an hour to scan 300GB on my computer.
I'm using Avast at the minute, not bad, but kaspersky seems much better.
Why is time to run an issue when you can schedule it to update and run during the night or some other time when you're not in front of the screen? For free I think it the best of the crop and the latest version is really well bolted together with a great UI, but Kaspersky is king (until it gets taken out by Symantec rolleyes).

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
Hut49 said:
Stu R said:
AVG I find a bit rubbish, it sniffs out viruses but I've also had a lot of false positives, and feck me is it slow, takes an hour to scan 300GB on my computer.
I'm using Avast at the minute, not bad, but kaspersky seems much better.
Why is time to run an issue when you can schedule it to update and run during the night or some other time when you're not in front of the screen? For free I think it the best of the crop and the latest version is really well bolted together with a great UI, but Kaspersky is king (until it gets taken out by Symantec rolleyes).
A simple question of efficiency really, why have something that takes an hour or more to do the job when there's an alternative that does the same thing as well, if not better, in much less time?
As far as free goes, Avast has AVG trumped in my opinion, hasn't overlooked any viruses, no false positives that I can think of unlike AVG, and much faster. AVG's not bad though.
As for running through the night, not a problem for me as my computer is on 24/7, but for the more energy efficient folks among us that's not always a viable option.

tali1

5,267 posts

202 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
im running avg at moment as ive ditched avast as it was unable to cope with a virus and gave hell in boot scans

_Deano

7,406 posts

254 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
m3evo2 said:
roadsweeper said:
Kaspersky is definitely worth a look.
yes
Or Steganos which is a rebranded version of Kaspersky (uses the same engine) and is about half the price. Although i don't think that it's happy with Vista atm.

Computer shopper did a test on the Internet security apps and this came tops. Although Nod32 and Kaspersky wern't in the line up.

oggs

8,813 posts

255 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
I use Sophos smile

Flat_Steve

1,533 posts

248 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
I'm using Avira antivir at the mo which is one of the better free AV's. Kapersky's better but that costs money.

_Lee_

7,520 posts

244 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
Nod32 gets my vote. Light on resources and just does the job effiecently and quietly.

roadsweeper

3,786 posts

275 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
Hut49 said:
Stu R said:
AVG I find a bit rubbish, it sniffs out viruses but I've also had a lot of false positives, and feck me is it slow, takes an hour to scan 300GB on my computer.
I'm using Avast at the minute, not bad, but kaspersky seems much better.
Why is time to run an issue when you can schedule it to update and run during the night or some other time when you're not in front of the screen? For free I think it the best of the crop and the latest version is really well bolted together with a great UI, but Kaspersky is king (until it gets taken out by Symantec rolleyes).
NoooOOOOO! We must fight to keep Symantec away from Kaspersky! rage