Buying an R129

Author
Discussion

Willwors

76 posts

129 months

Tuesday 11th July 2017
quotequote all
500s are definitely more scarce and a bit more money with it.

I'd say you're looking at £10k these days for a good, original car.

ras62

1,090 posts

157 months

Friday 14th July 2017
quotequote all
Prices have risen for sure and 500's seem very thin on the ground. Some of the prices are shockingly high, has the market cottoned on to these cars?

PositronicRay

27,066 posts

184 months

Friday 14th July 2017
quotequote all
ras62 said:
Prices have risen for sure and 500's seem very thin on the ground. Some of the prices are shockingly high, has the market cottoned on to these cars?
Or owners are over optimistic, to make decent money they need to be exceptional. I saw one for sale the other day, average early 500, owner thought it was worth £15k but willing to take £13.5k. rofl

Willwors

76 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
As a 500 owner I am of course hugely biased but...

£13.5k for a good one, if you think about it, is nothing for what you're getting. Iconic of-the-era design, pioneering technology, legendary Mercedes quality and durability and a howling 326bhp V8 (arguably one of Merc's finest). And the roof goes down.

All that for Fiesta money. Ignore historic bargain basement prices, the market must be starting to recognise that it's worth that any day of the week.


ras62

1,090 posts

157 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
The r129 is certainly one of the iconic shapes of the 90's but perhaps appeals to a different group to something like a Pug 205 GTI which is also a icon of that era. Where value is concerned though there really is no comparison between the two.
I have a problem looking at the prices of fast Fords or something like a Lotus Elan and thinking SL prices are high. Prices could double and they would still be great value in comparison. Maybe the market is starting to think the same way.

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
Can you all please stop encouraging the market to increase until after I find one, thank you hehe

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
Its interesting doing research on the R129 - they've had comments about being the next sought after classic for years (I've just seen another from 2012) and for whatever reason its not really happened yet (recession generally, perhaps). Does seem the V8s are thinner on the ground so seems more likely they're perhaps more likely to increase in value before the 320/300 or 280? More desirable+fewer numbers = modern classic?

mickyveloce

1,035 posts

237 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
There's a right load of old cobblers talked about emerging classics!

The 129, in it's homeland at least, is an established "youngtimer" which means it's achieved a status elevating it above other vehicles of a similar age and signifying that it has an enthusiastic following.

They only went out of production in 2000, and are still too numerous to command specific rarity value, even though good ones are harder to find than when I bought mine six years ago.

Prices have firmed up a bit, but I don't see them rocketing away like the air-cooled 911s did a while back. Owners can enjoy a gentle balm of appreciation, but must be mindful of a (potentially costly) programme of preventative maintenance.

The usual rules apply though, buy on condition and history alone.

yme402

Original Poster:

391 posts

103 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
If or not a car can be deemed a classic is in the eye of the beholder. Regarding the increase in value of such a car, this will happen gradually over a protracted period of time, and the financial gains will naturally be off-set by routine maintainence. Occasionally a car will have a dramatic spike in value, often due to featuring in a popular TV show or movie (Cortina MK3/Life on Mars is a good example), or by the manufacturer of the present day incarnation of the car in question using it as a form of retro marketing (Mini being a good example).

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
All fair points. I think they're a lot of car for little money, ultimately, which is why I'd like one. My only interest in its desirability is that it doesn't depreciate much over length of ownership. I had my camaro 7 years and sold for only a little less than the purchase price. It would be nice to think it might only cost me maintenance and fuel.

Willwors

76 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
I treat maintenance and fuel costs as "joy factor" - I tell myself that it's only reasonable to pay (something) for the enjoyment that a car brings!

And if the capital value goes up a bit, then great. I don't see the car doubling in value - slow and steady appreciation seems more likely!


Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
Willwors said:
I treat maintenance and fuel costs as "joy factor" - I tell myself that it's only reasonable to pay (something) for the enjoyment that a car brings!

And if the capital value goes up a bit, then great. I don't see the car doubling in value - slow and steady appreciation seems more likely!
Yeah I've never understood people who buy cars and then don't maintain them. Takes all sorts I suppose.

muchacho

255 posts

135 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
A 500 SL joined the fold today..







1990 60,000 miles.

Zonergem

1,368 posts

93 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
Excellent buy! The Hunstanton car, IIRC. The advert was confusing, made mention of FSH and then also of part service history too.

Between you, Crook and my, ahem, two we are slowly but surely cornering the market in Pearl Blue 500s. A get-together must be arranged.

Zonergem

1,368 posts

93 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
I did buy SL1 a new hat the other day.



It's a green/beige hardtop that I got for pennies and am stripping for the headlining and a couple of trim bits. But I quite like the three tone look. If I had the chance I'd have my actual top painted to match the Saccos.

muchacho

255 posts

135 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
You are correct Zoner - it is the Hunstanton car. I decided in the end that a bit of a lack of servicing was forgiveable when it had been stored nicely but used very little in recent years. The owners were nice too which makes a difference. What really swung it for me was the absence of rust. I have experience of crusty Mercedes jacking points (having a 190E) and this car is delightfully clean in that respect. Yours looks a nice motor too. Do send me an invitation to the Pearl Blue 500SL gathering..

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Interesting - lovely looking car. That blue with the tan seats is a stunning combination. All the "wisdom" read (on here and elsewhere) is that no FSH plus not being used much in recent years should equal a whole load of niggles and costs. I wonder how true that really is.

muchacho

255 posts

135 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Time will tell. But this is by no means a mal-treated car. All dealer stamps are present and correct until this recent phase of 5-10k miles during which it has had fluid services allied with local MOTs. In fact it actually feels a lot less niggly than when I took on my 190 Cosworth of the same age (though it had twice as many miles).

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Looks a stunner, to be fair. The 2 tone bodywork (for me) can look a bit cheesy but it looks great in blue. I think you can often tell a bit about the car from the owners. Or at least how well its been cherished.

r129sl

9,518 posts

204 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
muchacho said:
Corr! How good does that design look?

I used to have a dealer poster which showed the 129 in profile with the slogan, "It's better than it looks".