Manual vs Selespeed

Author
Discussion

RoadsterRaks

Original Poster:

1,868 posts

258 months

Friday 5th November 2004
quotequote all
If I can't get full dollar for my current steed, looking at getting a 01/02 147 2.0 Lusso.

Thing is, undecided with whether to purchase a Manual or Selespeed ? Been told the Selespeed is flawed - is this the case ?

Opinions and experiences people ....

pdV6

16,442 posts

262 months

Friday 5th November 2004
quotequote all
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual

RoadsterRaks

Original Poster:

1,868 posts

258 months

Friday 5th November 2004
quotequote all
take that as a no then !

eddymann

29 posts

237 months

Tuesday 9th November 2004
quotequote all
do not get the selaspeed
you will get bored driveing it after a few months
eddythealfaman

hughesie2

12,573 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th November 2004
quotequote all
eddymann said:
do not get the selaspeed
you will get bored driveing it after a few months
eddythealfaman


Really, i love mine, yes its had its faults, New GB and Clutch, both replaced under warranty, but a spirited drive none the less, and i'm not bored driving it yet, i get greater satisfaction from the Alfa box than i do from the Tip on the Merc.

TdF

337 posts

269 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
I have a 147 2.0 Selespeed......GET A MANUAL

1 year old 16k miles and been back 3 times with Selespeed problems.
It is great fun but i feel like i'm just waiting for the next problem

jacobyte

4,726 posts

243 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
I have a 2001 2.0 Manual 5dr. I got it brand new and it has never gone wrong. I am just about to replace the brake pads for the first time (42,000 miles).

So that's another one for the manual

James

maca

146 posts

260 months

Saturday 13th November 2004
quotequote all
ditto 2001 sportwagon 2.0 selespeed 48k...no problems.

Hughesie2

12,573 posts

283 months

Monday 15th November 2004
quotequote all
Horses for courses, why not nip out and try both ??



How have you got on so far ??

maranellouk

2,066 posts

264 months

Saturday 20th November 2004
quotequote all
I have to go with manual.

I have just spent this week in a Maserati Spider F1, a SRT/10 Viper and a 355 Spider (manual) in Hawaii Best of course, was the 355 with the metal on metal gear change. The addiction of raw off the line pull of the Viper suprised me however. The Maserati was really sweet as it is so sweet but the F1 system, although solid, got boring very quickly.

Although the paddles are fun, you do get a bit tired of them simply for the lack of involvement. Also, the feeling of the F1, selespeed or whatever you want to call it, is not right. There is always a slight..................hesitation which you won't appreciate.

Again, the 360 spider is F1 and as much as I love it the 355 spider in manual is prefered. We have an Alfa selespeed too and, same as before, it's fun at first but after a bit you sort of want to stick it in automatic (which I never do out of my sheer hatred towards automatic cars).

Try both but I am sure you will go for manual. Especially with those bloody little buttons in the Alfa.

MARA

jimbro1000

1,619 posts

285 months

Sunday 21st November 2004
quotequote all
The whole idea of a semi-automatic gearbox is that it removes all hindrances to getting around. You can put it in automode for around town (selespeed generally works in these conditions) or put in semi-mode for when you want a bit of hooning.

As an autobox is it acceptable even by modern standards (so far better than most of the past) but as a semibox it is a pile of steaming shite. There is a knack to using it without giving yourself whiplash with every gearchange but that doesn't make up for the fact that it is actually an obstacle to progress.

This is *not* a driver aid, it is the total opposite.

A rather enthusiastic Fiat salesman told me it was because the 2.0TS engine wasn't supplying enough torque and I should try the Stilo Abarth instead. So I did and came close to getting a dislocated vertebrae at the first gear change instead of a bit of gentle whiplash. I hate to imagine what these little "accidents" do to the engine internals or the rest of the car for that matter but I would expect anyone to need a good few days of steady driving to master the selespeed system before they can do anything approaching the speeds they would normally drive at. A bit of finesse and aforethought and you might start to get some gentle, subtle gearchanges instead of looking like a total prat but it doesn't change the fact that the system is seriously flawed and that doesn't even take into account the reliability issues.

If you want to see a good semiauto system in a (relatively) cheap car go and have a play in a Galant VR24.

maca

146 posts

260 months

Sunday 21st November 2004
quotequote all
subtle and smooth gear changes come with practise. the tendancy for the inexperienced is to keep the pedal buried which provides the elastic / slingshot feel in low gears. you don't get particularly sweet gear changes in a standard manual with the pedal planted either.

steve lyden brow

264 posts

233 months

Wednesday 29th December 2004
quotequote all
I am looking to buy a Selespeed Alfa 156 GTA, and I had heard about probs. with this system. There are, in fact, many websites that exist solely for problems with Selespeed Alfas ( I think one is just called
www.selespeed.com ). Certainly there were no end of software probs. with this system in early 147's and 156's, but now we are into the Mark 4 Selespeed system, the problems seemed to have been ironed out enough for me to still now want one. I will pay a good reward to anyone who can advise me of any Selespeed 156 GTA Sportwagons that they know about. Email me on marlin@spugs.fsnet.co.uk
Ta,
Steve.