Punto Cambelt failure

Author
Discussion

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all

The tensioner on our Punto (98 model) has disintergrated effectively disconnecting the cambelt. The engine has been turned over when we tried to restart it after the failure.

Does any know for sure if the pistons will have hit the valves.

Thanks

Ken

pwig

11,956 posts

271 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
Christ, a tensioner failure after two years, doesn't sound too good.

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
pwig said:
Christ, a tensioner failure after two years, doesn't sound too good.

Err its 8 years old .....

Wacky Racer

38,178 posts

248 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
pwig said:
Christ, a tensioner failure after two years, doesn't sound too good.



So a '98 model is two years old is it???



Wacky Racer

38,178 posts

248 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
fbloke said:

The tensioner on our Punto (98 model) has disintergrated effectively disconnecting the cambelt. The engine has been turned over when we tried to restart it after the failure.

Does any know for sure if the pistons will have hit the valves.

Thanks

Ken



Would not have thought you could tell for sure without a top engine stripdown, but quite likely in my experience....

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all

Just being a bit lazy realy. I wont be touching it for a day or two now because I have to source the spare parts. By fluke I do have a punto engine I bought from the breakers a few years ago. Years ago I had a Cortina that had a cam belt go and I got away with it. Just hoping I get lucky again.

Ken

pwig

11,956 posts

271 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
No but the belt and tensioner should have been changed 2 years ago.



Wacky Racer

38,178 posts

248 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
pwig said:
No but the belt and tensioner should have been changed 2 years ago.






Ah! Of course that's what you meant Pwiggers.........

Apologies......thumbup

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th December 2006
quotequote all
pwig said:
No but the belt and tensioner should have been changed 2 years ago.




wish i had .....

Ken

thepickle

975 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th December 2006
quotequote all
fbloke, I have a 98 60S and have recently done the head gasket, cambelt, tensioner, water pump etc. Having not done anything like this before, I signed up on a Punto forum and asked a few questions before I got stuck in. I'm not sure what model Punto you have, but regarding the 1.2 8v "Fire" engine, I was told that it is a "safe" engine in that the valves/pistons will not meet in the event of belt failure. Don't take this as 100% fact but that is what I was told so maybe things may not be as bad as you first thought

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th December 2006
quotequote all
thepickle said:
fbloke, I have a 98 60S and have recently done the head gasket, cambelt, tensioner, water pump etc. Having not done anything like this before, I signed up on a Punto forum and asked a few questions before I got stuck in. I'm not sure what model Punto you have, but regarding the 1.2 8v "Fire" engine, I was told that it is a "safe" engine in that the valves/pistons will not meet in the event of belt failure. Don't take this as 100% fact but that is what I was told so maybe things may not be as bad as you first thought


Cheers "thepickle" seams like its worth a try without taking the head off. It is the "Fire" engine. I shall replace the tensioner and retime the cam and see what happens. Worst cse it doesnt work and I shall have to do it all again. I'll post the results.

Ken

thepickle

975 posts

227 months

Friday 29th December 2006
quotequote all
If you know exactly what you’re doing then just ignore me, but these pics may be useful to you. They’re from fiatforum, hopefully they won't mind me sharing them. They helped me do the timing as the pic/description in the Haynes manual is not the best. On the crankshaft sprocket, the timing mark lines up where the metal on the engine goes from the straight section to an angle if you see what I mean. It will be obvious when you see it. I think that’s the bit that's not clear in the Haynes iirc. Like I said, if you're aware of all this then just ignore me silly
Paul

cam


crank




Edited by thepickle on Friday 29th December 09:52

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Friday 29th December 2006
quotequote all
Thepickle

Thats great those pictures help.I have done this sort of thing before but I have also made enough mistakes over the years to know that every bit of information is usefull. We have the Haynes manual and I need to double check. It apears we have to remove the alternator pully which is also has the ignition timing teeth on it. At first look there apears to be an oportunity to get this back on in any one of three radial positions, that is get it wrong!!. I shall match mark the wheel to make sure we dont do this.

I appreciate your input.

Ken

thepickle

975 posts

227 months

Friday 29th December 2006
quotequote all
fbloke said:
It apears we have to remove the alternator pully which is also has the ignition timing teeth on it. At first look there apears to be an oportunity to get this back on in any one of three radial positions, that is get it wrong!!
When you take the alternator pulley off, there is a tiny little hole in it between two of the three bolt holes. There is a tiny nobble thing on the crankshaft sprocket that fits into it. It is very easy to completely miss this altogether...like I did in fact! hehe This is there to prevent the exact scenario you mention...putting it back on in the wrong position thumbup

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Friday 29th December 2006
quotequote all
Spotted the nobley thing. What nobody knew was that there are two types of belt for this car. Belts with 3/8" pitch teeth and belts with 5/16" pitch. Sodds law came into force and with a 50/50 chance we got the wrong one.Local parts shop were excellent and we had another delivered in two hours. Dark by then so try again tomorrow.

I have taken pics and will post when job is done!!

Appreciate the input thepickle.

Ken

thepickle

975 posts

227 months

Friday 29th December 2006
quotequote all
Haha, yes, when I went to get my new belt I knew there were two options with different pitch but I didn't have a clue which one I needed. Luckily I'm lazy laugh and there is a Fiat main dealer only a couple of minutes away from me so that's where I got a few parts from. I just gave them the reg plate (as we got the car new from them) and they knew which belt, of the two, I needed.
Paul

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Saturday 30th December 2006
quotequote all
The first picture below is the new bearing leaning on whats left of the original.



There is a cover in the right wheel arch that need to be removed shown below



So we removed that and saw this (we had already removed the cam belt cover



Then we could see all the bits that fell out of the bearing (balls and some of the seal the rest was all gone !!!)



We had already discovered that there are ttow types of belt for this car.The belts at the top is the wrong type for our pullies. We have flat teeth at 3/8" pitch. The other type has rounded teeth at 5/16" pitch. The correct belt is shown at the bottom. The flat tooth belt has 108 teeth the rounded tooth belt has 129 teeth, they are both nominally the same length though.



The picture below shows the pully on our car which has flat teeth



more in next post.....

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Saturday 30th December 2006
quotequote all
This is the Unipart number for the flat tooth belt



We marked the lower pully with a tyre pen to make the lines easier to see. The nobbley bit has also been marked to make it show up a bit beeter. (Oval poit at 6 oclock)



It was difficult to see the cam pully so we used the camera and a bit of marker paint to help



We put all the bits back on and hey presto it started first time. Raging result.



Joe (its his car) checked the tyre pressures while we were at it and charged the battery a bit. Test drive was OK .JOB DONE !!!!.



Thanks to Paul for his input. We were on the verge of pulling the head off. In the event we didnt need to.This engine at least is "safe". That is the pistons did not hit the valves without the cam running.

Ken

PS
This was Joes first job on an engine and now busily looking up tunning bits. I think he has just got "the bug"

thepickle

975 posts

227 months

Saturday 30th December 2006
quotequote all
That tensioner looks thoroughly buggered!! I'm glad you got it sorted thumbup...especially without having to take the head off (I know all about the hassle of that!) That feeling of satisfaction when it all comes together and works is well worth it isn’t it
Paul

fbloke

Original Poster:

960 posts

216 months

Saturday 30th December 2006
quotequote all
thepickle said:
That tensioner looks thoroughly buggered!! I'm glad you got it sorted thumbup...especially without having to take the head off (I know all about the hassle of that!) That feeling of satisfaction when it all comes together and works is well worth it isn’t it
Paul


You'r dead right! Joe and I were well chuffed when it worked.

Ken