Did anyone else know this about the egg industry?

Did anyone else know this about the egg industry?

Author
Discussion

Digby

Original Poster:

8,243 posts

247 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all

Dublte

75 posts

162 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
The driving dogs on another thread just put a smile on my face, this wiped it back off again.

I always work on the principle that if I could kill an animal for food, if push came to shove, then I can eat it in my daily diet. I don't think I could do that to a chick...

Edited by Dublte on Wednesday 5th December 17:25

Dublte

75 posts

162 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Those male chicks shouldn't have to die for you to eat eggs though.

That said, I dunno what you do with them? And it seems they do get used.
I entirely agree, though sadly it is uneconomical to keep them alive. After all they are someone's business. Unfortunately it is the same state of affairs for male calves in the dairy farms, especially with the UK's negativity towards veal.

I've always fancied having my own chickens - this makes it seem an even better idea.

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

187 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
I'm not defending the industry, but the bloke on the video says maceration is the method of disposal recommended by the RSPCA and the Humane Slaughter Association.

This is the reality of cheap eggs. How many people these days see meat other than vacuum packed in the supermarket?


Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

183 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Male chickens don't lay eggs, why would an egg producer keep them? It's harsh on the male chicks but that's life.

That macerator seems a bit rough though, the Auschwitz-inspired way seems a touch kinder.

MX7

7,902 posts

175 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Dublte said:
I entirely agree, though sadly it is uneconomical to keep them alive. After all they are someone's business. Unfortunately it is the same state of affairs for male calves in the dairy farms, especially with the UK's negativity towards veal.
Rose Veal seems to have become quite popular.


Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

183 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
MX7 said:
Rose Veal seems to have become quite popular.
Same result as the chicks though, they're killed at a young age because their use as they get older becomes limited, it's uneconomical to keep them.

Condi

17,219 posts

172 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
What did you think happened to them? Unless you thought male chickens produced eggs?

Same as male calves, pretty much useless on dairy farms and their genetics are so different from beef cattle that you cant rear them for meat. Actually, its a bit more complicated than that, with crosses and what have you, but ultimately 25% of calves born will never be any good for meat, no matter what you feed them. The other 75% may be economical depending on feed costs and beef prices etc.

A male chicken though, is totally and utterly useless on an egg farm. They will never grow for meat.

PeanutHead

7,839 posts

171 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Just wondering what alternatives there is for the chicks, the mass breeding for hens must create nearly as many male chicks that does seem to be more of a hindrance to the industry rather than a marketable byproduct.

Condi

17,219 posts

172 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
PeanutHead said:
Just wondering what alternatives there is for the chicks, the mass breeding for hens must create nearly as many male chicks that does seem to be more of a hindrance to the industry rather than a marketable byproduct.
Same with anything - hence why they are trying to use sexed seamen on dairy cattle. A female calf might be worth £100, say, and a male just £10, if that. If you can reliably produce female calves, or female chicks then its much more efficient than at present. Problem is that nothing works reliably. I doubt you will ever get sexed chicks because they are bred naturally, cows can be artificially inseminated and so you can prep the seamen beforehand.

pokethepope

2,657 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Dublte said:
I entirely agree, though sadly it is uneconomical to keep them alive. After all they are someone's business. Unfortunately it is the same state of affairs for male calves in the dairy farms, especially with the UK's negativity towards veal.

I've always fancied having my own chickens - this makes it seem an even better idea.
How will that be any different though? If you buy only females for eggs then the associated males would still have been killed by the breeder, or will you just get male chickens and raise for meat (is there any difference in the meat from male chickens I wonder?)?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
"Stop this unimaginable waste - Don't buy eggs"

How about "fk off you hippy tossers".

Dusty964

6,923 posts

191 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Cant they just mess around with the genetics so they end up with more females?

Eta- given the OP's name, they should know something about it

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

158 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
"Stop this unimaginable waste - Don't buy eggs"

How about "fk off you hippy tossers".
beer

mattnunn

14,041 posts

162 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
Cocks, male chickens are cocks.

We used to make them fight you know, and we'd bet on the outcome, it was somewhat of a obsession in early Victorian times.

Better to have lived and fought than to have been macerated at 3 days old - as my old nan used to say.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
The trouble is with egg laying breeds is that they are fking useless for meat. the hybrid breeds are cap at egg production and naff for meat. therefore the males are useless. the gassing seemed ok, the mincer would be a quick death, if unpleasant to think about.

Dublte

75 posts

162 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
pokethepope said:
How will that be any different though? If you buy only females for eggs then the associated males would still have been killed by the breeder, or will you just get male chickens and raise for meat (is there any difference in the meat from male chickens I wonder?)?
Hadn't thought too hard about meat. As they would be pets too I'd consider a male. I can't imagine it would grow as much as the female though with regards to meat.

In small groups I thought they required a male presence to 'activate' the female's ovaries - though this might be rubbish.

Robb F

4,570 posts

172 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
I'm gonna get shot down for this. But what a bunch of limp wristed yoghurt knitters.

PeanutHead

7,839 posts

171 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
I'm sure there must be a profitable food source from male chicks or cocks, maybe a food source for zoos, dogs food etc...

Dusty964

6,923 posts

191 months

Wednesday 5th December 2012
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
"Stop this unimaginable waste - Don't buy eggs"
Not to mention that surely the females would then also face Colonel Sanders final solution as there would be little point keeping them alive for a non existant market either, which is going to double some poor sods gas bill.