Crank speed sensors - go/no go?

Crank speed sensors - go/no go?

Author
Discussion

geeman237

Original Poster:

1,240 posts

187 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Do cranks speed sensors either work or not? ie no middle ground. My car has a miss/stutter and I have replaced plugs, leads, rotor arm, coil and distributor cap. See my posting this week about the Wheeler Dealer fuel cleaner. Could it be the crank speed sensor? Jaguar 4.0 XJS

Thanks

paintman

7,711 posts

192 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
When the crank position sensor on my wife's 307 failed the car wouldn't start - or even try to fire. No fuel injected either. No prior warning, drove onto the drive the previous evening without issue, refused to start in the morning.

What diagnostics have you had done? And have these been done with Jaguar specific diagnostic equipment? Changing parts at random in the hope it will cure a fault is often unsuccessful but usually expensive



Edited by paintman on Friday 21st December 18:02

Crafty_

13,319 posts

202 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
AFAIK they either work or not.

What year is the car ?
There could be other management issues causing it..

Steve_D

13,760 posts

260 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
geeman237 said:
....rotor arm, coil and distributor cap.....
If the car has a dizzy I would think it doubtful that it has a crank sensor but am happy to be proven wrong.
More likely it has an ignition pickup and amplifier in or on the dizzy.

Steve

Steffan

10,362 posts

230 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
paintman said:
When the crank position sensor on my wife's 307 failed the car wouldn't start - or even try to fire. No fuel injected either. No prior warning, drove onto the drive the previous evening without issue, refused to start in the morning.

What diagnostics have you had done? And have these been done with Jaguar specific diagnostic equipment? Changing parts at random in the hope it will cure a fault is often unsuccessful but usually expensive



Edited by paintman on Friday 21st December 18:02
Good Post. We have reached the point with all modern high tech cars where the first point of call for any apparent fault must be computer diagnosis. That would be my suggestion, Crank sensors are on/off but you may have an oddity.

paintman

7,711 posts

192 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Thanks. The days of replacing the condenser & setting the points gap with a bit of Rizla packet are long oversmile
Unfortunately some garages also adopt the 'lets replace this & see what happens'approach but still include the bits that didn't make a difference on your bill.

With the dizzy I wonder whether wear could be a factor?
This may be of interest - note that it refers to points distributors & I'm unsure whether the same would apply to an electronic dizzy:
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gmSavy1RPxEC&am...

Edited by paintman on Friday 21st December 20:51

Crafty_

13,319 posts

202 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
The only time I've seen a crank sensor be intermittent was on a rebuilt engine, no-one realised it but the crank disc had been bent, not by much but just enough that the car would fire and then die instantly. Caused some scratching of heads for a while. In the end the crank came out again, a good disc put in and all was fine.

Won't apply in this case though? unless there is a lot of end float?

I'm thinking the first thing is cover the basics, which you've started. Compression test both hot and cold, fuel pressure. Have a really good look around for an air leak on the inlet side - vac hoses, gaskets, pipes - absolutely everywhere.
Next thing would be to find someone that can live data read off it to check load - if its getting the fuelling wrong it could cause the misfire, this could point at a dodgy MAF/MAP sensor.


Evoluzione

10,345 posts

245 months

Saturday 22nd December 2012
quotequote all
If it's intermittent it could be a break in the (or a) wire or bad connection.

stevieturbo

17,301 posts

249 months

Saturday 22nd December 2012
quotequote all
Anything electrical can cause intermittent problems. If it was always as easy as working, or not working, repairing modern cars would be much much easier !

But generally, a fault there should show on the on board diagnostics in some shape or form. Although not always..

Megaflow

9,488 posts

227 months

Saturday 22nd December 2012
quotequote all
I believe they can give intermittent issues, but this will only be shorted lived before total failure. Certainly that's how it worked on the only car I've had a crank sensor fail on, it started to to misfire, stall, etc, but a couple of days after issues started it was totally nada...

PaulKemp

979 posts

147 months

Sunday 23rd December 2012
quotequote all
I agree with Eveluzion
I fitted Megajolt 3D mappable ignition to an old Pinto in a kit car
Took me a long time to get to the bottom of intermittent ignition issues turned out to be wires breaking in the plug, they would mostly contact untill giving it the beans then intermittent.
Took 2 complete rewires until I supported the cable to the plug.
Everything ok since then

stevieturbo

17,301 posts

249 months

Sunday 23rd December 2012
quotequote all
Doing a scope trace connected at the ecu end would immediately show any irregularities with the crank signal in a case like the above.

Although even the basic rpm reading should have shown there was a problem in that area

geeman237

Original Poster:

1,240 posts

187 months

Sunday 23rd December 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for all the input on this. The miss or stuttering is really bugging me. One thing I have noticed is on the plug leads. I fitted a set of Magnecor leads to replace the tired Jaguar originals. If a little dust has built up on them you can sometimes see star shaped witness marks on the leads, like they are arcing. Its not very obvious, but its there. What could this point to? I have since heard mixed reports on Magnecor plug leads. I have thought about going back to Jaguar OEM leads.

The car is a 1994 Jaguar XJS AJ6 engined model and does have a distributor and does have a crank sensor, just to clarify some earlier questions.

Another suggestion was take it to a Jaguar dealer for a diagnosis. My local dealer does not have any equipment anymore for this age of Jaguar, but I did take it into them to look at. They couldn't even detect the misfire. I also fear they would just go down the route of replacing parts in the hope of finding the problem. I don't think there is a garage in my area I would entrust to work on the car regarding electronic diagnosis. (I live in a small city in the southern USA......if it ain't a Ford or Chevy......go figure). With this age of car I don't think there is much plug and play capability correct?

I am going to remove the crank sensor and take a look at it, maybe there is some dirt or grease on it? (Clutching at a straw or two here). I will clean the connector plug too.

What about a faulty oxygen sensor?
I will also check the fuel supply, filter etc. Could be an intermittent blockage.
Faulty ECU?

More suggestions welcome.



stevieturbo

17,301 posts

249 months

Sunday 23rd December 2012
quotequote all
I doubt anyone would suggest the main dealer for diagnosing problems. Most get confused if they have to do any more than an oil change.

There's bound to be a mechanic with a brain somewhere near to where you live ?

As for the leads arcing. Unless they were damaged during fitting, it is unlikely. Simple test, run the engine in pitch darkness, and any arcing will be very apparent.

PaulKemp

979 posts

147 months

Monday 24th December 2012
quotequote all
Muck on the sensor end won't make a difference, metal fillings might
If the problem started after a change of leads, change back to the old ones

Megaflow

9,488 posts

227 months

Monday 24th December 2012
quotequote all
It's the leads. I'll bet the magnecors are not suppressed, so the crank sensor is picking up interference.

blitzracing

6,395 posts

222 months

Monday 24th December 2012
quotequote all
Im with this man- People put on "race" leads thinking they will gain something. Even though Magnecores do have some DC resistance, a lot of the resistance is made up by the fact the leads are inductive, so present an effectively resistive path when a rapid AC pulse is applied to them in the form of an HT pulse. The idea is you don't loose as much HT energy like you do in a conventional lead as the effective resistance drops as the HT voltage reduces. The problem is the lower "resistance" makes the coil discharge more quickly which causes larger voltage spikes on the coil primary. More importantly the HT system has been designed with enough excess energy to maintain a perfectly good spark with resistive leads in the first place, so you dont actually gain anything, except bigger spikes that can affect the surrounding electronics. There is a place for low resistance leads when firing LPG, using Nitro, or very high boost pressures where you need all the power you can get to ignite the spark in the first place, but not your normal engine. If you really want to spend your money want Magnecores go and read their web site, and make sure you choose the right ones. Id stick with quality OEM ones any day myself, at a quarter of the cost and work just as well.

As for the crank sensor- the magnetic ones that count the fly wheel teeth, have a magnetic core that cause a magnetic loop to be formed as the teeth pass, which induces a small voltage into the coil around the magnet that the ECU picks up. The sensor will become intermittent as the magnet ages, so the signal level drops to a point they become intermittent as the voltages become too small to be detected, so its not quite go / no go.

geeman237

Original Poster:

1,240 posts

187 months

Wednesday 26th December 2012
quotequote all
I will look some more into the leads. I have had my suspicions about them. Maybe also check out a new cranks speed sensor. They are too much. I know its going down the road of replacing partst until we (hopefully) find it, but by narrowing down the possible causes through a process of elimination it might not coat me an arm and a leg, just an arm......

Just as a comparison with no intelligence behind it, I started my Triumph Herald Christmas Eve. First time its run in nearly 2 years. The carb was a bit gummed up, so took it off stripped and cleaned it in 20 mins, fresh petrol supply and she fires rights up sweet as a nut.


stevieturbo

17,301 posts

249 months

Wednesday 26th December 2012
quotequote all
geeman237 said:
I will look some more into the leads. I have had my suspicions about them. Maybe also check out a new cranks speed sensor. They are too much. I know its going down the road of replacing partst until we (hopefully) find it, but by narrowing down the possible causes through a process of elimination it might not coat me an arm and a leg, just an arm......

Just as a comparison with no intelligence behind it, I started my Triumph Herald Christmas Eve. First time its run in nearly 2 years. The carb was a bit gummed up, so took it off stripped and cleaned it in 20 mins, fresh petrol supply and she fires rights up sweet as a nut.
Swapping parts without testing will cost an arm and a leg unless you are incredibly lucky.

I would highly doubt the leads are the problem, but it isnt impossible.

Any dummy with a scanner should be able to see if the rpm signal is erratic though which would give you an indication if the problem does lie with the crank signal. Better still, stick a scope on it and check the signal.

paintman

7,711 posts

192 months

Wednesday 26th December 2012
quotequote all
And after swapping all the parts at random you might find yourself in the same position as someone I know (No, it wasn't me). After spending £600 on new parts to try & cure a fault it turned out to be the brand new - and faulty - rotor arm which he'd fitted at the start.......