Jaguar F-Type: Six or Eight?
Why the V6 S, and not the V8 S, is the one you really want
This being PistonHeads, the range-topping supercharged V8 brute may seem to be our more likely preference. 495hp in a relatively small, rear-wheel drive package does have a certain primal attraction, but a spirited drive along a damp mountain pass proved a point; short shifting to fourth and lightly feathering the throttle out of tight corners to maintain traction quickly became the default driving mode. With sweaty palms and a beating heart, I just couldn't see V6 S being any slower across that particular stretch of road, which was as stifling as British B-roads can often be. Given that all of the power could have been used much more of the time and that the six-pot sounds every bit as exciting as the V8, I reckoned the 'lesser' model would actually be more fun, too.
With an extra 30kg over the front axle in the V8 model, there is very slightly more inertia to overcome in quick direction changes. The steering also feels as though it's been corrupted by the additional weight for there is marginally more resistance to overcome, rendering the Dynamic steering mode redundant.
As we dropped out of the mountains and onto the valley floor, the road did open up and the V8 was better able to stretch its legs, but my mind had been made up; the V6 S is the sweeter, more rewarding car. The £12,500 saving is also more than significant.
In anything other than optimal conditions the V8 S can be a right old thug. The rear tyres struggle to contain the swollen torque on corners exits, too, so it is often squandered.
That isn't to say the V8 is a duffer. It's actually much less of an over-engined hotrod than I had expected it to be (in dry conditions, at least) and the straight-line speed that the 5.0-litre unit delivers when circumstances allow is intoxicating. With the more aggressive styling and black detailing it did also look superb; on a purely emotional, subjective level, the F-Type V8 S is a wonderful machine.
Jaguar's chassis guru Mike Cross summed it up well, however. I was lucky enough to share a V6 S with him for 100 miles across a variety of road types, each taking turns behind the wheel. "We've been able to give the V6 S a proper thrashing today," he said. "We'd only have been able to do the same once or twice in the V8."
Read our full road test of the new F-Type here.
You know, between this and the GT86 etc, is it possible that we've perhaps gone too far with performance on road cars and are perhaps coming to the conclusion that sometimes less is more?
Don't get me wrong, I love a car that can accelerate well, but for context we're about to get a little Midget as a stablemate for the Cerbera. The Midget will never scratch the power itch, but with a tuned A-series I reckon it'll be a good giggle.
I was speccing up an F-Type a month or two ago but I'm not sure I want to pay that much for a car really. Curiously, it was the V6 S I was attracted to.
"We've been able to give the V6 S a proper thrashing today," he said. "We'd only have been able to do the same once or twice in the V8."
Well said - in the vein of less power often equals more fun.
Last years 'drivers car' darling of the motoring world was the 197bhp Toyota GT86, even the V6 F-Type puts out twice that.
Cheers,
Dan
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff