Alfa GT, any good?

Author
Discussion

littlened

Original Poster:

144 posts

144 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
As the title says, are they any good?

Look absolutely lovely.

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
I've never driven one, but i love Alfa's, and the GT is definitely on my must-own list, some day, i'll have one, with the 3.2 V6.

Here's what i know:
- it's based on the 156/147 platform, engineering is good, but not on the level of the 159/brera, so expect some italian-ness (although the 156/147/GT platform is already pretty good). The main thing platform wise is suspension arms at the front, they wont last very long, and need replacing often-ish, i'd also be on the lookout for rust on older GTs, as the 147/156 havent proven impervious to it, although which 10-15 year old car has?

- Engine wise, i'd avoid the 2.0 JTS, it isnt the best engine, has some issues and IIRC a recall, not many JTSses actually deliver the stated power. The 1.8 TS is more reliable/on spec, but personally, i think 140hp is a bit little for a GT, it'll get you to a nice top-speed, but you wont win any traffic-light drags, and high speed overtaking will be slow. The JTD 16v is a nice engine, JTDs are bulletproof, respond well to remapping (although the 16v only benefit to the tune of ~20 bhp before becomming limited by the turbo and other expensive stuff). The only downside for the JTD is that a 4 pot diesel isnt exactly befitting of a classy italian GT car
The V6 then, is the absolute cream of the crop, the last busso V6 to appear in an alfa, the most characteristic engine they ever made (although some prefer it in its old 12v guise, or the tuned up GTA version), and rather reliable too.

Long story short, get one, with a V6 in it, and smile everytime you look at it/drive it.

Four Litre

2,019 posts

193 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
I drove a 3.2 GT and it didnt do much for me - quite dissapointed.

On the other hand I loved the 156 GTA!

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
I agree they look lovely. They certainly have the cool factor in spades.

I owned a 147 GTA, which is similar. They feel a bit nose heavy and probably need the Q2 diff upgrade.

RenesisEvo

3,615 posts

220 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
Four Litre said:
I drove a 3.2 GT and it didnt do much for me - quite dissapointed.
My experience matches this. Beautiful car, and the engine is stunning in both noise and performance, but the car to me offered very little else, it was very much a one-trick pony. A great drive-way ornament.

FeelingLucky

1,084 posts

165 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
Checkout the AlfaOwner forum, lots of owner impressions on there.

Also a lot of people who've had GTs and Breras and preferred the GT.
Q2 dif is a must, and they also have VERY useable back seats.

Personally I'd go for the V6, BUT the 1.9JTDm is (for what it is) a very good engine.

Ozone

3,046 posts

188 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
The OH had a 1.9 JDTM Cloverleaf with Q2 diff for a couple of years. It looked lovely and was comfortable inside and went and handled pretty well. It wasn't particularly economical, she was getting 32 - 35 mpg.

The bad stuff was the rattle in the boot at delivery mileage which the dealer eventually sorted. The rear heated window element failed so rear screen replaced. The stereo cut out intermittently, the clutch failed at 20k (the dealer tried to get out of replacing it under warranty), the metal EGR pipe sheared at 25k, the drivers door handle broke, the clutch pedal connection pin sheared, the drivers seat release lever broke, the brake master cylinder level sensor failed and it is a total bh to change the headlight bulbs.
All that was within 2 years and 40k miles. She was glad to see it go.

Oh, and the dealers are useless.

Oh, and the electric windows stopped closing, if i think of anything else i'll update this biggrin

Edited by Ozone on Wednesday 8th May 22:05


Edited by Ozone on Wednesday 8th May 22:05

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
Mine is a keeper. It always has something slightly wrong with it but in about 3 years has not let me down nor has it presented me with any big bills.
Mine is only a 2 litre JTS, the 3.2 version is the special one, that engine!

Chris Type R

8,038 posts

250 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Reasonably happy with mine, a V6 Q2 in red/tan.

Not sure I'd buy another though - FWD is wrong, and some of the bits are less than strong. The cabin is a good place to be, rear seats are comfortable, lots of boot space.

ts86net

133 posts

230 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
I believe there are different V6 engines in these, the Twin Spark (earlier, same as in the GTAs) and Twin Phasor (built with some GM parts).

Check AlfaOwner for specifics of why one or the other.

big_boz

1,684 posts

208 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Alfa Owners forum......will tell you all that you need to know.

If you still want one after you have read through the forum, you are officially alfetti and should buy one immediately!

sinbaddio

2,375 posts

177 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Had a 2.0 JTS selespeed for two years. Fabulous looker (ladies loved it) not exactly an inspiratonal drive though. Red leather interior was awesome, as was the fact there are 3 belts in the back. Definitely go V6.......

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
ts86net said:
I believe there are different V6 engines in these, the Twin Spark (earlier, same as in the GTAs) and Twin Phasor (built with some GM parts).
No, the only V6 the GT ever had was the Busso. The newer one was only in the 159 and Brera/Spider. smile

V6Alfisti

3,305 posts

228 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
ts86net said:
I believe there are different V6 engines in these, the Twin Spark (earlier, same as in the GTAs) and Twin Phasor (built with some GM parts).

Check AlfaOwner for specifics of why one or the other.
The GT only uses the proper busso 3.2 V6, the twinspark is the 1.8, the JTS is the 2.0 and there was also the 1.9 JTD.

Personally I really love the GT (on my second one now).

It it a slightly firmer setup than the 156 although same base platform, like the looks, like the drive (and steering response), very practical for a coupe with a big boot and fold down rear seat.

Only problem with the GT for me is the same as with the 147/156 and that is the suspension can crash over bumps. Otherwise they are quite strong cars, electrics aren't a problem, just a case of butter suspension bushes, checking oil levels e.t.c

The 2.0 JTS is a good engine with strong amounts of torque, the earlier 52/53 plates in the 156 were the more problematic ones. I have owned three 2.0 JTS models and all of them have been great (touch wood) with a couple nearing 80k miles. The 3.2 V6 is a gem, the 1.8 I haven't driven in the GT form but found it underpowered in the 156 and the 1.9 JTD is a good small *sub 2 litre* capacity diesel unit but it isn't the most refined and I found the rev limit frustrating. The 2.4 JTD is a far better unit imo but wasn't available in the GT.

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Had one for 3 years. Sold it two months ago and haven't really missed it. It was a JTD and I should really have got a 3.2....

Pat H

8,056 posts

257 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Why wasn't the 2.4 JTD available in the GT?

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
Pat H said:
Why wasn't the 2.4 JTD available in the GT?
Because it was never fitted to the 147 either, which is what the GT was based on.

peaktorque

1,807 posts

212 months

Thursday 9th May 2013
quotequote all
I have owned my 2007 GT Q2 (JTDm) for 2.5 years-ish

I love driving it (despite the tractor engine) almost as much as my TVR biggrin

It rattles and it isn't especially well put together, part of it's character I suppose - but it has proven reliable overall.

It is a bit small really for what my misses needs, so I'll be sorry so see it go when we find a replacement.