Timber Garage Question

Author
Discussion

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
I've been all over the internet with tnis, and nobody seems to know definitively, so I thought I'd ask here, and then sit back while it all kicks off smile

I have a timber garage on a property boundary. It's old, so it's legal. However, it needs replacing because it's old and leaky.

I want to replace with timber, so it needs to be "substantially non-combustible". My question is can I achieve that (to the satisfaction of Building Control) using intumescent paint outside and fireproof plasterboard inside?

They have told me that if I replace the garage, I have to adhere to the 1m/substantially non-combustible rules. However, as it's a old building, I can repair it without any such concerns.

Do you suppose I can repair all four walls, and the roof, and make it bigger all at the same time? wink

I know I could potentially ask the council, but I don't really want to put myself on their radar...


TIA

herbialfa

1,489 posts

203 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
1. Ask the council but don't give your address!
2. Look at Marley board - that will give you the fire resistance required!

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
herbialfa said:
1. Ask the council but don't give your address!
2. Look at Marley board - that will give you the fire resistance required!
1. Hmm... crafty..
2. Is that instead of timber, or to clad the timber? I can only find something called Eternit.

GetCarter

29,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
My house is made of wood. I had to paint (parts of) it with 'Nullifire' to meet regs.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
My house is made of wood. I had to paint (parts of) it with 'Nullifire' to meet regs.
Yeah, but doesn't Scotland have its own rules? Specifically designed to contradict the English ones? wink

Seriously, though; how long does that stuff give you?

I've been told about Envirograf paint, which gives 30minutes, but I'm struggling to find out if that's long enough to be considered 'non-combustible'.

GetCarter

29,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Doofus said:
Yeah, but doesn't Scotland have its own rules? Specifically designed to contradict the English ones? wink

Seriously, though; how long does that stuff give you?

I've been told about Envirograf paint, which gives 30minutes, but I'm struggling to find out if that's long enough to be considered 'non-combustible'.
For what it cost I would hope it would take napalm for 30 mins. Could well be that Scotland is different to England, but I bet your posh paint will hold some sway with regs.

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
I'm not sure that 'my' paint is any posher than yours. I suspect I'll have to get the council to agree to the fire-proofing, just for peace of mind...

GetCarter

29,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Doofus said:
I'm not sure that 'my' paint is any posher than yours. I suspect I'll have to get the council to agree to the fire-proofing, just for peace of mind...
My paint and your paint are probably equally 'posh' and almost certainly equally expensive. My point is that building regs will okay timber buildings if they are fireproofed smile

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Finally! After all my internet-trawling, I've got an answer I am happy with. I'm going with it, whether or not it's right, because it's what I want to hear biggrin

I'll send you a tenner in the post, in recognition of your professional advice.

And then I can sue you if it goes pear-shaped wink

bstw

148 posts

185 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
What was the answer then?

Also, what are the chances of building control being able to prove that wood hasn't been treated with the stuff?

GetCarter

29,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
bstw said:
Also, what are the chances of building control being able to prove that wood hasn't been treated with the stuff?
Out of interest, I had to show an invoice for the purchase to Building Regs. I could of course have sold it all back on eBay unopened. (But I didn't)

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
bstw said:
What was the answer then?

Also, what are the chances of building control being able to prove that wood hasn't been treated with the stuff?
The answer was that I can paint an intumescent coating on the timber, and the council will agree that the garage is therefore non-combustible.

The chances of them being able to prove I didn't do it are slim, admittedly. However, if they say that intumescent paint doesn't satisfy their requirements anyway, it would be irrelevant.

But Steve (my professional adviser who is, I hope for his sake, fully covered for Professional Indemnity) has told me I'll be fine. smile

GetCarter

29,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Doofus said:
The answer was that I can paint an intumescent coating on the timber, and the council will agree that the garage is therefore non-combustible.

The chances of them being able to prove I didn't do it are slim, admittedly. However, if they say that intumescent paint doesn't satisfy their requirements anyway, it would be irrelevant.

But Steve (my professional adviser who is, I hope for his sake, fully covered for Professional Indemnity) has told me I'll be fine. smile
Just remember I'm in the Highlands, where planning is a 'best guess' and regs are worked out on a fag packet in a hotel bar. (And you think I'm kidding!)

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Oh. It's like that, is it?

Well can I have my ten quid back then please?

Craikeybaby

10,434 posts

226 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Your current garage sounds a lot like mine, I'm also planning to replace it this year. It will have to be within 1m of the boundary. I had initially looked at the wooden garages, but I'm not convinced about the longevity - especially if I can't get round to re-treat the wood. So I've come to the conclusion that I need a brick built garage, or should I still be looked at wooden garages?

Doofus

Original Poster:

25,968 posts

174 months

Friday 7th February 2014
quotequote all
Craikeybaby said:
Your current garage sounds a lot like mine, I'm also planning to replace it this year. It will have to be within 1m of the boundary. I had initially looked at the wooden garages, but I'm not convinced about the longevity - especially if I can't get round to re-treat the wood. So I've come to the conclusion that I need a brick built garage, or should I still be looked at wooden garages?
I really don't want a brick or concrete garage because, in my opinion, they are more prone to condensation than timber. I have always preferred timber, but others don't, of course.

If the eaves overhang is enough, then maintenance to the side on the boundary won't be a problem. In my case, the neighbour's garage is right up against the same boundary, so the weather just won't get to that wall anyway.