Titanium valves - How much HP ?

Titanium valves - How much HP ?

Author
Discussion

G Man

Original Poster:

4,053 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
OK guys time for some fun ... it's Christmas

I have a little SBC engine that produces 640 bhp, the engine went back to American Speed after all the power runs ( I insisted on this as part of the deal ) to break records, the engine was perfect but while I was at it, I asked for some Titanium valves to be install ..
No other work was done, ie head or cams, rev limits and all other parameters the same ..

So pre Ti Valves = 640bhp 377 ci
Post Ti Valves = ???? 377 ci

The winner gets a ride at VMAx, or beers at Le Mans or bottle of wine ...they choose

Answers on Sunday ..

G Man

eliot

11,439 posts

255 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Arr, Come on give us a clue....

My punt would be 666bhp


If I win, I might let you have a go in mine...you know you wanna...

(Brand new Twin T34's currently under my desk keeping my feet warm )

>> Edited by eliot on Friday 17th December 10:16

trackdemon

12,193 posts

262 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
640bhp.

I'll have a bottle of chateau neuf du pape please

Will keep an eye out for you at VMAX

omitchell

19,761 posts

236 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
698 - 700 bhp?

BLUESATIN

3,114 posts

273 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
550bhp!

G Man

Original Poster:

4,053 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Bluesatin

I will give you a clue it is not less ... nice one

G MAN

davefiddes

846 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Hmmm. Got to be a similar engine to the AS 377c.i. 700 bhp engine so... I'd guess 725 bhp on the AS dyno.

G Man

Original Poster:

4,053 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
davefiddes said:
Hmmm. Got to be a similar engine to the AS 377c.i. 700 bhp engine so... I'd guess 725 bhp on the AS dyno.


Dave

THe AS 700 engine has different cams and ported head, if I remember correctly ..

You are too high

G MAN

B1 ECC

388 posts

256 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
My engine builder just did a back to back test with gapless rings on a 350 HO chevy, 38 bhp improvement, so I don't think "the valve job" will give that kind of improvement.
I'll go for 22bhp (662 in total)!!

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
I wouldn't have thought a change of material weight would have made any difference unless you increased the rpm threshold or the valves and seats had recut angles.

So assuming there were some revised angles I'll guess at 664 bhp.

If valve seats etc remained the same I'd say 640 hp.

Boosted.

canam-phil

489 posts

260 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
I wouldn't have thought a change of material weight would have made any difference unless you increased the rpm threshold or the valves and seats had recut angles.
Boosted.


Am I missing something here, what do you mean by rpm threshold?

gtr-gaz

5,094 posts

247 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
665 hp

G Man

Original Poster:

4,053 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
ooohh, lots of guessing in the 660-9 range

Interesting ideas about valves seatings, valve angles remained the same ...

G MAN

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
canam-phil said:

Boosted LS1 said:
I wouldn't have thought a change of material weight would have made any difference unless you increased the rpm threshold or the valves and seats had recut angles.
Boosted.



Am I missing something here, what do you mean by rpm threshold?


Well, lighter valves allow higher rpms to be used whilst maintaining some reliability and that is where you can gain extra bhp. If the rpm's stay the same as before then the engine isn't pumping any harder or drawing in more air. So, you could make valves from anything you like but the airflow won't have changed just valve train mass.

If the valves are a better shape then the ones previously fitted more air will flow into the engine and power/torque will increase, assuming the former valves were restrictive. So, if there's a significant power gain then I'm intrugued to see what caused it

My 2 cents, sorry tuppence

Boosted.

G Man

Original Poster:

4,053 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:


Well, lighter valves allow higher rpms to be used whilst maintaining some reliability and that is where you can gain extra bhp. If the rpm's stay the same as before then the engine isn't pumping any harder or drawing in more air. So, you could make valves from anything you like but the airflow won't have changed just valve train mass.

If the valves are a better shape then the ones previously fitted more air will flow into the engine and power/torque will increase, assuming the former valves were restrictive. So, if there's a significant power gain then I'm intrugued to see what caused it

My 2 cents, sorry tuppence

Boosted.


Interesting Ideas Boosted , much is sound , but you have missed something ....

G MAN

tvrolet

4,277 posts

283 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all


titanium valves run cooler maybe? Densen up the charge a wee bit?

Got to be honest though, unless the revs are raised I can't see what difference valves in a different material will make to power unless they're bigger.

WB

steve_D

13,749 posts

259 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
I feel the same as boosted on this one. Lighter valve train, more revs = more power but not much. 660 for me.

Steve

GreenV8S

30,209 posts

285 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
Are the Titanium valves thinner where they cross the inlet manifold (hence less obstruction)?

canam-phil

489 posts

260 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
My guess is that unless the valve train was limiting the max revs and the hp curve was still on the up at the old max revs, then the titanium valves would have marginal bhp effect. Gman, did you ever say what revs the max bhp was developed at?

So I am theorising that the torque/hp curves are very much the same up the rev range. May be very marginal changes due to valve flow but more down to atmospheric test differences that are compensated out by the calibration factor.

Gman, are you going to publish both dyno charts for us all to look at?

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Friday 17th December 2004
quotequote all
G Man,

We need to know if the seats are unchanged and the valve angles the same Apples to apples and all that.

Also tell us if the stems are waisted or if the valves have different profiles behind the heads. Oh, are they sodium exhausts and hollowed inlets Gotta ask that one.

Ah, I get it. You've done a 4 valve head

Boosted.