Raising money on one house, to buy another....

Raising money on one house, to buy another....

Author
Discussion

wildcat45

Original Poster:

8,087 posts

191 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all

Surely it has to be complicated......

I have found a property I really want. It is up for 100k. I own a property, no mortgage, no debts on it, that is worth in the region of 500k. I have an income which means I can easily afford a 100k mortgage.

Is it as simple as finding a lender who will help make this happen?

Also, the 100k house is a holiday cottage. I don't want to rent it out, but would like the option to maybe ine day. In the first instance this would not be a commercial venture.

Just getting 100k mortgage on the second house, with a deposit is one asnwer, but I want the freedom of not having a mortgage on it so I could one day let it out if for example I find II don't use it much, or if in unforeseen future circumstances I need a bit of extra income.

I'd appreciate any advice.


Jasandjules

70,014 posts

231 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Why not just get a mortgage based upon the property you wish to purchase?

wildcat45

Original Poster:

8,087 posts

191 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Because I want the flexibility to rent it out as a holiday cottage. It has a rental income of 5k. My prime intention is not to rent, but if my circumstances change, say for example I get a job at the other end of the country, or need some extra income, I want to be able to let it with out having seek permission from a lender.


HenryJM

6,315 posts

131 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Getting a mortgage on your current property shouldn't be a problem assuming you have income that covers it. 20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender.

Jasandjules

70,014 posts

231 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
Because I want the flexibility to rent it out as a holiday cottage. It has a rental income of 5k. My prime intention is not to rent, but if my circumstances change, say for example I get a job at the other end of the country, or need some extra income, I want to be able to let it with out having seek permission from a lender.
Then yes you can get a secured loan on your property.

I would expect a mortgage lender to be quite happy to do that with an LTV that low.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
HenryJM said:
Getting a mortgage on your current property shouldn't be a problem assuming you have income that covers it. 20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender.
After the recent mortgage market review a lender can no longer agree a lend just because of a low LTV as this protects the bank rather than the customer.

It's all about the ability to service the debt.

HenryJM

6,315 posts

131 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
MRSNEAK said:
HenryJM said:
Getting a mortgage on your current property shouldn't be a problem assuming you have income that covers it. 20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender.
After the recent mortgage market review a lender can no longer agree a lend just because of a low LTV as this protects the bank rather than the customer.

It's all about the ability to service the debt.
???

What was it about what I wrote that dismissed that? The bit about having the "income that covers it" should be clear.

You need an acceptable LTV and the income.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
This bit "20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender".

To me that could mislead another reader and I thought it worthwhile pointing that out despite your comment on the need for income.





HenryJM

6,315 posts

131 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
MRSNEAK said:
This bit "20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender".

To me that could mislead another reader and I thought it worthwhile pointing that out despite your comment on the need for income.
Well I suggest that you read and digest the whole of the posting in the future. As stated the "20% LTV means it's virtually no risk for the lender", but they will require "income that covers it".

It's really hard to see how that is misleading.

Sarnie

8,067 posts

211 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
Surely it has to be complicated......

I have found a property I really want. It is up for 100k. I own a property, no mortgage, no debts on it, that is worth in the region of 500k. I have an income which means I can easily afford a 100k mortgage.

Is it as simple as finding a lender who will help make this happen?

Also, the 100k house is a holiday cottage. I don't want to rent it out, but would like the option to maybe ine day. In the first instance this would not be a commercial venture.

Just getting 100k mortgage on the second house, with a deposit is one asnwer, but I want the freedom of not having a mortgage on it so I could one day let it out if for example I find II don't use it much, or if in unforeseen future circumstances I need a bit of extra income.

I'd appreciate any advice.
I'm a broker and can help if needed. smile

You're right to do it the way you have suggested. Mortgages on holiday lets can get extremely difficult to secure, especially if the property is potentially unoccupied for extended periods over the winter.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
So why post it if we both agree its irrelevant.

I am not getting into a debate here.

All I was trying to do was make anyone who read this thread aware of the very recent changes in legislation which they may not have heard about.


98elise

26,954 posts

163 months

Sunday 7th September 2014
quotequote all
Very easy to do, this is how I funded my first BTL.

You can also offset the mortgage costs against income from property 2. All you need to do is be able to prove that the cash was borrowed to fund the purchase.

Their fact that's it's secured against property one is not an issue. It's the purpose of the loan, not the security that counts.