RE: Bentley Mulliner Bacalar | PH Review
RE: Bentley Mulliner Bacalar | PH Review
Friday 7th August 2020

Bentley Mulliner Bacalar | PH Review

A slow, wet drive in a very fast Bentley roadster



The combination of a seven-figure show car with zero weather protection and the British summer means that, of course, it’s raining. Not gently, either – Goodwood’s track surface is rapidly passing from damp to properly wet. It is sodden enough to have me remembering Kenny Brack’s astonishing drive in Adrian Newey’s very oversteery GT40 at the 2013 Revival in similar conditions. And he had a roof.

Not that I’ll be getting close to Kenny’s level of commitment today, despite the promise of 650hp and Bentley’s claim the Bacalar should be the fastest open-topped road car it has ever produced. While impressive, there’s a big asterisk next to it – it only applies to the 12 finished customer-spec cars that Mulliner will be building for those both rich and lucky enough to get their names on the list for this £1.5m super-special. The car I’m going to be in is the one that was built for the cancelled Geneva motor show in March, built to look nice rather than undergo extreme dynamic assessment.

It’s a point made when I climb into the beautiful cockpit, most of which is already glistening with moisture. My first instinct is to close the windows, but the switches don’t do anything. Similarly the milled aluminium rotary controller for the climate control turns without altering the number displayed on its digital readout. The hands of the clock and trio of bronze-beveled dials in the centre of the dashboard are frozen in place, too. The digital instrument pack is live, but it’s playing a looped video that has the speedo peaking at 170mph. At least the wipers work.


While it’s not representative of the finished car, the Bacalar is also a fascinating thing, effectively marking Bentley’s return to in-house coachbuilding after several decades. Underneath it shares its core mechanical package and sub-structure with the existing Continental GT Convertible. External bodywork has been radically altered with a combination of aluminium and carbonfibre panels, styling now incorporating individual headlights rather than the twin units that Bentley has used since the mid-90s.

Getting geeky, the door handles and windscreen are carried over from the Conti. In the case of the former that’s because they contain the aerials and mechanism for the keyless entry system, and with the latter it’s because of the need for the safety of the windscreen top rail, which is designed to work in conjunction with the roll-over protection hoops that are still housed under the rear bodywork. Cabin architecture is mostly the same to the GTC, it’s harder to change switchgear and internal panels than external bodywork, but with every surface covered with something rarer and considerably more expensive than it would be in a Conti. 

Professional cynicism laid temporarily aside, it also looks absolutely stunning. The show Bacalar’s Yellow Flame paint works particularly well in the gloomy conditions – the metallic finish uses rich husk ask for its sparkle. The intricately designed 22 inch rims look more like weapons than wheels. It’s a piece of automotive art and, with the added ability to finish it in any colour they like, the customer spec cars will look identical.


They will also drive better. Show cars are rarely designed to move under their own power at much more than video speed, and although the first Bacalar sits on a production GTC chassis and has a proper W12 engine, the Bentley attendants on hand are obviously concerned about the risks of putting excessive loadings through various prototype components. The fact the seatbelts don’t work also limits my enthusiasm for a no-holds barred lap of one of Britain’s fastest circuits. (We know some of the pictures have been taken heading the wrong way, and many in dry conditions I didn’t get to experience.)

Yet while the production car’s figures are suitably virile – Bentley estimating a 3.5 second 0-60mph time and a 200mph top speed – I reckon that most owners are likely to treat it in much the same way I do at Goodwood. The car is obviously well suited to a cruising pace, riding the muscular mid-range torque of the big engine and enjoying its wuffling soundtrack while the twin-clutch gearbox demonstrating its ability to deliver what feels like torque converter smoothness as well as lightning rapidity. Faster progress is going to get breezy without a roof, and if you do travel quickly how are you going to see all of the jealous glances?

The long windscreen is also pretty effective at keeping rain off for as long as the car is moving, although it still feels wrong to be subjecting something so nice to a partial soaking. I’m concerned for both the quilted leather seats (each with more than 148,000 individual stiches) and the wool cloth dashboard facings. But Maria Mulder, Bentley’s chief colour and trim designer, is on hand to assure me it’s far tougher than it looks; apparently all materials have to meet Volkwagen Group standards for both durability and (in open-topped cars) short-term water resistance. You will be able to specify a Bacalar with less weatherproof finishes, but you’ll also have to sign a form to say you accept the risk of them being damaged by the elements.


Coachbuilding for cars began where it had finished for horse-drawn carriages: putting different bodywork onto a separate, low-tech chassis. The arrival of monocoque construction made that much harder, but with the Bacalar Bentley has proved it is possible to transform the look of one of its modern cars while keeping both the core structure and most of the all-important tech. Mulliner boss Tim Hannig admits that the decision to only build 12 of the Bacalar was deliberately conservative and that the company could doubtless have sold many more. There was even consideration given to making it a one-off, but only briefly. “We spent around £5m on engineering before we’d made a single part. We would have had to sell the finished car for at least £7.5m.”

Hannig is also happy to confirm that there will be other coachbuilt Bentleys that offer similar – or even greater – levels of transformation, although he insists that numbers will never get as high as they have for some of the ‘limited’ supercar runs. “When you increase volumes people’s excitement goes away,” he says, “I don’t think we’ll ever get to 150, let’s say.”

“But we absolutely are not planning to do one and then stop. This is a very serious start into a forgotten niche of the market.”


SPECIFICATION | BENTLEY BACALAR

Engine: 5,998cc, twin-turbocharged W12
Transmission: 8-speed twin-clutch, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 650@5000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 663@1350rpm
0-60mph: 3.5 second (est)
Top speed: 200mph+
Weight: 2,300kg (est)
CO2: TBC
MPG: TBC
Price: £1.5m 'ex-works', £1.8m UK

















Author
Discussion

RSTurboPaul

Original Poster:

13,126 posts

289 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Hmm.


Are they trying to follow BMW's lead of making cars less attractive?

Not a fan of that look - the front is too fussy and disjointed, the rear is... hard to put my finger on it but the weird 'pursed lips' spoiler thing unsettles me, lol.


Of course, personal taste is just that! and I'm as far from the target market as a penguin in the jungle, lol, so I'm sure it will sell very well to those who can afford this sort of thing! biggrin

Edited by RSTurboPaul on Friday 7th August 02:33

gizard

2,272 posts

314 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Looks nice esp. the rear. Only thing is the front has a lot of venting - BMW 4 series anyone????

gizard

2,272 posts

314 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Hmm.


Are they trying to follow BMW's lead of making cars less attractive?
snap!

Pookie123

911 posts

169 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Not really a looker in my eyes. Don’t think the colour does it any favours mind.

bish_345

147 posts

101 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
For the asking price I'd rather have a regular Continental GT Convertible and buy this with the change...


|https://thumbsnap.com/qHeftQeV[/url]

howardhughes

1,424 posts

235 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Everything was going fine until I saw that front end vomit

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
My goodness that's absolutely gopping!

Uncle John

5,386 posts

222 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
The front looks like an emoji.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

285 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Apart from the looks and the price it's ok

Steve12NG

340 posts

183 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Everything was going fine until I saw that front end vomit
My thoughts exactly.

Why are so many current cars cursed with extremely ugly front ends when the rest of the car is fine? I find it amazing that someone signs off on these horrors.

Bloxxcreative

568 posts

76 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
The back looks OK, has a bit of an 8 series vibe, but good golly the front looks like a Chinese rip off gone wrong. More money than sense whoever buys these, although if they have that to spend on it who am I to judge.

John Allison

25 posts

147 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Front end way too fussy, looks like the designers didn’t know when to stop. Looks more like someone has taken their conti GT to mansory than a £1.5m coach-built special. Still- only have to find 7 people in the world who are rich & blind enough to buy it!

Centurion07

10,395 posts

278 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
I saw the first pic and thought "hell yes".

I saw the second pic and thought "oh god, no".

I saw the price and couldn't stop laughing.

Mouse Rat

2,110 posts

123 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
It needs a blob eye conversion kit. Im sure future owners will browse the scooby forums for ideas.

Rozzers

3,070 posts

106 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
I’m not a target customer, but thats awful and apart from the more obvious Ripspeed elements, is the perspective making that centre dash console look ridiculous or is it really that big?

Rather have a Renault Clio Baccara....

Andy83n

612 posts

93 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Rozzers said:
I’m not a target customer, but thats awful and apart from the more obvious Ripspeed elements, is the perspective making that centre dash console look ridiculous or is it really that big?

Rather have a Renault Clio Baccara....
The interior looks awful

Venturist

3,472 posts

226 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
Bit of a strange one isn’t it. I’m the first to be keen for coachbuilding to return, cars in terms of basic platforms now are generally all very good. But I don’t understand why anybody is humouring this as being anything other than a tarted up Conti, which it literally is, not even in an overly-dismissive sense - and then I don’t think the new look is particularly nice either. To the extent that even if they were the same price I’d genuinely prefer a boggo Conti, which is one of the best looking modern cars IMO.

confused

Lastmin

91 posts

241 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
would be interesting to see it in another colour to see if its one of those cars that colour can really change the way some of the 'more challenging' design elements look no doubt in yellow it will get plenty of headlines and media column inches and in the future draw some crowds at shows.

ultrastapler

244 posts

186 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
The stock new continental is so handsome, how have they made this so ugly?

phil4

1,651 posts

269 months

Friday 7th August 2020
quotequote all
that front end -- oh my life, that's horrible.