Shoot the boss!

Author
Discussion

Pot Bellied Fool

Original Poster:

2,131 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Just have a look at this piece http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4650645.stm about the Chief Constable of GMP volunteering to be tazed as part of his campaign to have tazers issued to rank & file officers.

I'd be interested to hear what our BiBs have to say about being issued with such 'less lethal' weapons. Is it a good thing or could we get instances of them being used (as with that US clip that was doing the rounds) on people who are merely non-compliant rather than an out & out threat? Or should they be used but restricted to firearms officers and used as a less lethal option before opening fire?

But anyway, that's not why I posted - rather have a look at the top pic...

Is it just me or does that guy with the tazer have a helluva grin on his face from getting the opportunity to shove 50,000 volts into his boss? :)

Well you would wouldn't you!

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

235 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
50,000 volts sounds impressive, but as any decent electrician knows, its not the potential that kills, its the current.....

Personally I think a Tazer is a bit less damaging than an asp to the body.

Dibble

12,938 posts

241 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Geat minds think alike...

Pot Bellied Fool

Original Poster:

2,131 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
Dibble said:
Geat minds think alike...


...and as my mother always said Fools seldom differ

Pot Bellied Fool

Original Poster:

2,131 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
50,000 volts sounds impressive, but as any decent electrician knows, its not the potential that kills, its the current.....


Absolutely. It's the voilts that jolts but the mills that kills and all that. I still wouldn't bloody well volunteer though!

POD said:
Personally I think a Tazer is a bit less damaging than an asp to the body.


In some ways yes, although when a tazing goes wrong, the outcome is far worse than a couple of extra bruises or a bloodied nose.

I actually support the use of such things - as an option that falls short of full-on shoot-to-stop in the same way that US cops sometimes use bean-bag rounds from a shotgun to subdue someone without going all John Wayne.

Personally though, I wouldn't want to see non-specialist units issued with them - I think their use would become too indiscriminate when viewed with the potential for longer term nerve damage etc. And if I was a BiB faced with a chav pisshead giving it loads of aggro on a saturday night - and I had a tazer - I'd be tempted to use it.. it has to be said.

volvos70t5

852 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
The guy with the gun is just enjoying himself tooooooooo much

soir

2,269 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
looks like paul burrell (?? Di's ex-butler) with the gun and prince william on the left!

soir

2,269 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
I actually think the CC is a star for doing this.

MR2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 5th July 2005
quotequote all
soir said:
I actually think the CC is a star for doing this.


Either brave or very stupid. There have been 80 odd deaths US directly attributable to use of Tasers.