RE: Rare VW Scirocco Storm for sale
RE: Rare VW Scirocco Storm for sale
Thursday 22nd June 2023

Rare VW Scirocco Storm for sale

Not only a fantastic example of a great car, but here's why it's probably worth every penny...


Sometimes, I write about a car that I know will be polarising – the recent Rover 213 Spotted is a case in point. That was always going to be a love-it-or-loathe-it thing. But this pick from the classifieds is not one of those. I am not expecting it to be divisive. I am betting the house on this Volkswagen Scirocco Storm invoking nothing but calm, universal appreciation on the internet – at least for the car itself. The price will, no doubt, receive the usual ‘how much?’ criticisms, but I am not going to miss the opportunity to write about a spectacular car because of that. If the market says that a car, which was once worth some hundreds of pounds, is now worth several thousands, who am I to argue? I am not the chancellor after all. And it doesn’t make the car any less special or noteworthy, does it? Quite the opposite. 

While we’re on the subject of price, it seems widely accepted that a good Mk1 Golf GTI costs around £20,000 these days. Maybe more for an exceptional one. In theory, a Mk1 Scirocco Storm should cost even more. After all, it has the same engine, gearbox, and basic chassis ingredients, but it’s a lot, lot rarer. Volkswagen apparently sold something in the region of seven-million Mk1 Golfs, but how many Mk1 Sciroccos left the factory gates do you reckon? About half a million. So it’s a two-door coupé version of a great car, but much rarer and, don’t forget, coach-built. It was produced by Karmann in Osnabrück, rather than at Wolfsburg where the Golf GTI was churned out in such vast numbers. In any other classic car scenario, all that would lead to its value rising exponentially over the hatchback equivalent, especially because it looks like only 13 Storms are taxed today.

It's unlikely to be a rose-tinted letdown, either. The 108hp 1.6-litre fuel-injected motor is capable of making the Storm’s performance…well, more than a storm in a teacup. It’ll do 115mph and 0-60mph in 8.8 seconds, which, I believe, classes it as perky. And quicker than that VW in Swabian drag, the Porsche 924 – the original 2.0-litre 924 managed the same acceleration benchmark in 9.5 seconds. To my eyes, the Giorgetto Giugiaro-designed Scirocco is rather prettier than those early 924s as well.

It was also light. We’re talking lighter than a moth in a hot air balloon by today’s standards, but also light for the time. Let’s use the 924 as a comparator again. That weighed 1,100kg, which is 27 per cent heavier than the Scirocco. The VW tips the scales at a mere 800kg. That’s the sort of holy grail weight figure us PHers can only dream about these days, and it explains why this Scirocco would feel so much livelier than a 924 on the road. This was no Luddite next to its rivals, either. The Storm was relatively advanced for the time, with disc brakes all round (vented up front), along with front and rear anti-roll bars. The overhead-cam engine, of course, had mechanical fuel injection, and that was far from commonplace as well. . 

I mentioned the Giugiaro styling earlier and I’ll do so again – for the simple reason that it’s lovely. There are ‘70s designs that look jarring these days, but this Giugiaro isn't one of those. It’s clean, simple and, above all, harmonious. I’ll give you the money myself if you can find a line or a feature that looks out of place. And the Storm additions didn’t detract from it, either. Again, that’s not always the case when cars from the ‘70s – or in this case, one that stretched into the early ‘80s – were ‘improved’. The Storm’s 13-inch alloys look smart and the little chin spoiler merely adds some Roger Moore-style gravitas to the front, don’t you think?

Then there’s the interior. This car’s tan leather is just exquisite, setting off the exterior, with its hint-of-bronze metallic, to a tee. The fact that it has leather is something rare, too, considering this car was from a time when you were lucky to get a passenger door mirror or a cigarette lighter. This has both, by the way. And it isn’t a carbon copy of the Golf’s interior, either, which shows the effort that went into differentiating the two cars. The two round pods that house the main VDO dials are snazzed-up with an aluminium surround, and those dials are supplemented by the clock and oil pressure gauge in the centre console. That also has the tape-cassette holders for the top-tier Blaupunkt digital stereo, which is a lovely, original touch.

And that’s exactly what this car seems to be: original, in the unmodified sense. It’s had work done, but that can only be a welcome thing after 42 years when a car is known to suffer from rust. But what steel-bodied car doesn't? It’s had a respray, according to the advert, and also ‘a cambelt, water pump, clutch kit and engine tune-up in 2018’ to spruce up the mechanical side. Genuinely, I think this is one of those rare occasions where a car seems expensive on the face of it, but the more you dig into the details the more you start to wonder whether the opposite is true. Is it too cheap? Either way, as a standalone piece of automotive memorabilia, it’s a winner in my book.


SPECIFICATION | Volkswagen Scirocco Storm (Mk1)

Engine: 1,588cc, four cylinder, naturally aspirated
Transmission: five-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 108 @ 6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 103 @ 5,000rpm
CO2: N/A
MPG: N/A
Recorded mileage: 116,000
Year registered: 1981
Price new: c.£6,600
Yours for: £17,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Dombilano

Original Poster:

1,453 posts

85 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Ooooh yes please

Robigus

114 posts

262 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Lovely interior.

My Scirocco had awful brakes. The pedal box was connected to the servo via - what was effectively - a torsion bar across the bulkhead. Much of the breaking effort was absorbed in the bar’s twisting. The RHD conversion was a little half hearted.

Fabulous build quality though and very comfortable.

Lotobear

9,135 posts

158 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Dad had a series of 4 Scirrocos all from new - 2 original GLS ones URG 409T then DTY 211W and then two of the later shape, the last one a GTX. They were his mid life crisis I guess!

Loved them, though as said above the brakes were terrible but they loved to cock a back wheel under hard cornering which was pretty cool.

He was good with letting me drive them and great fun was had in the GTX tear arsing around the streets of the North East with my mates, one in his yellow RS2000 and the other in his black 3.0S Capri.

Happy days, a pretty car - the later models were not as nice IMO

Turbobanana

8,471 posts

231 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
John Howell said:
I’ll give you the money myself if you can find a line or a feature that looks out of place
For me, the rear looks a little like it's been kicked by someone with very large feet - it's too stubby. I accept this is a contentious view, but I'll submit my invoice anyway smile

ImFeelingSaucy

499 posts

54 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
That looks lovely.

I don't think it's crazy money either.


P-Jay

11,407 posts

221 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
I'd buy that in a heartbeat, but my mortgage deal has just ended and taken all my money with it.

Mr_Sukebe

390 posts

238 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
I owned a couple of mk2s back in the day, the 2nd being a Gti.
As mentioned, yes the brakes were awful.
They also had heavy steering and no rear headroom, as my friends can attest to.

All the same, loved them at the time. Not something that I’d hanker over now

languagetimothy

1,779 posts

192 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Mr_Sukebe said:
I owned a couple of mk2s back in the day, the 2nd being a Gti.
As mentioned, yes the brakes were awful.
They also had heavy steering and no rear headroom, as my friends can attest to.


All the same, loved them at the time. Not something that I’d hanker over now
There was a fix for the brakes that made them normal, had it done to a golf Gti race car. Can’t remember what it involved because it was so long ago! Also, clutch cable can snap on these. I always carried a spare.

Edited by languagetimothy on Thursday 22 June 12:39

Boom78

1,522 posts

78 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Rare, interesting, great looks, retro, ‘scene’/show cred and reasonably priced. It’s a yes from me.

WPA

14,735 posts

144 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Rare and interesting car and sensible money, the reason why so few remain is they rot badly.

It is a yes from me.

BillyB

1,436 posts

288 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
I had a GTi in the early 2000's. Sold it to friend for £600 who then scrapped it without me knowing. I nearly cried when I found out. By no means perfect but I loved that car and dearly wish I'd never sold it, regardless of appreciation. Just a classic design.

LuS1fer

43,529 posts

275 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
My employer had a Mik 1 1.6 GLS. I drove it once and came away largely unimpressed. His daughter had a Derby 1.3 and that was similarly boring.

He replaced the Scirocco with a discounted XR2i Mk 1 and wished he hadn't (Basically, he discounted a small pit bike for a car dealer who was happy to return the favour and he was too mean to pass it up...) but there was an element of "VW snobbery" to it.

I owned a Mk II Scirocco GTI (1800) which was brilliant - really enjoyed it and the only car I've ever sold for more than I paid for it.

By contrast, the "cooking" Scirocco Mk II GTX (carburettor) I had was a very average car indeed but for the £900 I paid for it, I wasn't complaining.

Besides, the Alfasud Sprint was a far better looking car, next to the dumpy Scirocco.

Edited by LuS1fer on Thursday 22 June 13:24

emperorburger

1,484 posts

96 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Bargain.

Geoffcapes

1,308 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
I thought the Storm was the bodykitted late version?

But WTF do I know?

Lotobear

9,135 posts

158 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
My employer had a Mik 1 1.6 GLS. I drove it once and came away largely unimpressed. His daughter had a Derby 1.3 and that was similarly boring.

He replaced the Scirocco with a discounted XR2i Mk 1 and wished he hadn't (Basically, he discounted a small pit bike for a car dealer who was happy to return the favour and he was too mean to pass it up...) but there was an element of "VW snobbery" to it.

I owned a Mk II Scirocco GTI (1800) which was brilliant - really enjoyed it and the only car I've ever sold for more than I paid for it.

By contrast, the "cooking" Scirocco Mk II GTX (carburettor) I had was a very average car indeed but for the £900 I paid for it, I wasn't complaining.
The Mk11 GTX was the GTI version, as far I recall there was no Mk11 'GTI' just the GTX which had the 1800 Golf GTI injection engine

RSstuff

1,270 posts

45 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
The Mk11 GTX was the GTI version, as far I recall there was no Mk11 'GTI' just the GTX which had the 1800 Golf GTI injection engine
Wasn't there a LHD 16v version as well?

SFTWend

1,458 posts

105 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Lovely car and one of the few I miss.

As a young man I needed more cash for a house deposit. So I sold my 4 year old XR3 for £4k and bought a 7 year Scirocco GTi for £2k. Turned out to be a significant upgrade as the VW was far more refined in every respect, bar the brakes, than the Ford.

Lotobear

9,135 posts

158 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
RSstuff said:
Lotobear said:
The Mk11 GTX was the GTI version, as far I recall there was no Mk11 'GTI' just the GTX which had the 1800 Golf GTI injection engine
Wasn't there a LHD 16v version as well?
I do seem to recall something like that.

I also seem to recall certain 'performance' models of the subsequent Corrado might have only been available as left hookers

WPA

14,735 posts

144 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
LuS1fer said:
My employer had a Mik 1 1.6 GLS. I drove it once and came away largely unimpressed. His daughter had a Derby 1.3 and that was similarly boring.

He replaced the Scirocco with a discounted XR2i Mk 1 and wished he hadn't (Basically, he discounted a small pit bike for a car dealer who was happy to return the favour and he was too mean to pass it up...) but there was an element of "VW snobbery" to it.

I owned a Mk II Scirocco GTI (1800) which was brilliant - really enjoyed it and the only car I've ever sold for more than I paid for it.

By contrast, the "cooking" Scirocco Mk II GTX (carburettor) I had was a very average car indeed but for the £900 I paid for it, I wasn't complaining.
The Mk11 GTX was the GTI version, as far I recall there was no Mk11 'GTI' just the GTX which had the 1800 Golf GTI injection engine
Not correct, L, CL, GL, LS, GLS, GLI, GT, GTI, GTL, GTS, GTX, GT II, Scala, GT 16V and GTX 16V were available over the years plus a few different special editions.

JD2329

513 posts

198 months

Thursday 22nd June 2023
quotequote all
I far prefer these to the Mk2. A very clean design and the Storm has to be the pick of the bunch.