RE: Mazda 3 MPS | Spotted
RE: Mazda 3 MPS | Spotted
Wednesday 3rd April 2024

Mazda 3 MPS | Spotted

Look past the understated styling and you'll find 260 reasons to love Mazda's underrated hot hatch


Japan knows a thing or two about hot hatches. We’d all likely rank the Honda Civic Type R as one of the all-time greats, while the facelifted Toyota GR Yaris has elevated the already brilliant homologation special to even loftier heights (even if it comes at a £10k premium). Delve into the classifieds and you’ll find (much) cheaper thrills with the various iterations of Suzuki Swift Sport, the Subaru Impreza WRX STI hatchback and, if you’re lucky, one of the many ‘sporty’ kei cars built for the JDM.

What about this, then? The Mazda 3 MPS rarely (if ever) ranked among Japan’s more notable hot hatches, and to be fair it doesn’t exactly have it easy when you factor in the aforementioned cars - but you could easily pin that down to the way it looks. Mazda apparently spent all of about five minutes on the design, and although the second-gen like the one you see here brought a sprinkling of sportiness (RX-8-inspired 18-inch alloys, a bigger spoiler and dual exhausts), it was still nowhere near as edgy as the Euro-built head cases such as the Ford Focus ST and Vauxhall Astra VXR.

On the positive side, the modest styling gave little of the car’s ability away. Behind the massive plastic grin was a 2.3-litre turbocharged four-pot with 260hp - mighty punchy by mid-2000s standards and still remarkably competitive today. Granted, that all had to be managed by the front wheels, but get your launch right and you could hit 62mph from a standstill in 6.1 seconds. Again, that’s properly impressive for its age, and only a tenth shy of the 300hp Mk2 Focus RS. 

In fact, the Mazda 3 shares its underpinnings with Ford’s family hatch, so you’d expect some of the Focus’ class-leading handling to have translated over to its Japanese cousin. Things wouldn’t pan out that way for the launch car, which was hampered by vague steering and an exhaust note that was just as boring as the styling, but things were greatly improved with the second generation. Mazda chucked in a set of beefier anti-roll bars and stiffened up the suspension, upping torsional rigidity by 41 per cent, while a limited-slip differential arrived as standard. Admittedly, the changes weren’t enough to elevate it above the Focus ST in the handling department, but reviews at the time suggested it was much better at sending its huge power to the road than the first MPS was. 

As it wasn’t short on grunt in the first place, the output for the second-generation car remained the same as the original. Mazda did, however, fit new pistons and tweaked the ECU, which not only bumped up mid-range torque but also helped reduce CO2, making the newer cars cheaper to tax. The MPS also had an edge on the kit front, as they came fully loaded as standard. The sat nav screen may be dinky (you’ll want your phone for that anyway), but ten-speaker Bose audio, climate control and parking sensors all help make it a perfectly serviceable daily runner.

Okay, so it doesn’t rank among the all-time great hot hatches, but that does at least mean you won’t have to fork out a small fortune to nab yourself the cream of the crop - which is exactly what we have here. This 2009 has just 31,000 miles on the clock, and going off the pictures it looks pretty spotless inside and out. These tend to be tuned beyond recognition, so it’s refreshing to see one that’s been kept in its original state and maintained with a full service history. True, the asking price of £11,495 is on the high side, especially as you could pick this grey example up (albeit with nearly four times the mileage) at a chunky discount. But if you’ve got a hankering for this particular slice of mid-2000s hot hatchery, it’s hard to imagine there are many left as minty as this. 


SPECIFICATION | MAZDA 3 MPS

Engine: 2,261cc four-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 260@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 280@3,000rpm
MPG: 29.1
CO2: 224g/km
Year registered: 2009
Recorded mileage: 31,000
Price new: £21,500
Yours for: £11,495

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

pb8g09

Original Poster:

3,224 posts

98 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
Bonkers price. Presumably a reflection on the mileage, which will be instantly eroded after a few years of daily driving.


wistec1

797 posts

70 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
11.5K is a delusional price. Good luck trying to sell that LK Cars. Catch it next time round on shed of the week when some victim has dropped a few more miles on it. Not even remotely interesting.

Hippea

3,862 posts

98 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
How much!?

martin12345

1,007 posts

118 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I really thought I wanted one of these about 14 years ago as on paper they looked great

What killed it for me was
a) Somewhat inert chassis/steering feel
b) Cheap feeling interior
c) 30mpg meant BIK tax as a company car was pretty horrible


Went with a Mk5 Golf which was nicer to drive, nicer to sit in and more tax friendly at 35mpg

TBH I don't think much has changed with the passage of time that would change that choice and at £11.5k this does seem super expensive as well

J4CKO

46,838 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
Tidy and low miles but couldn't justify eleven grand or anywhere near for a 14 year old hot hatch that was a bit of an also ran at the time, see it more in the five to seven range, and thats for those who are into them.


Dombilano

1,443 posts

84 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
£11.5k hahaha. Its a £7k car max

DaveH23

3,355 posts

199 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I have a 57 plate MK I.

Just ticked over 70k miles and I absolutely love it. Costs me buttons to run in the grand scheme of things and quite rare as well.

Steven-f95ud

10 posts

76 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I did an experience day at Thruxton in the mid-2000s. Drove an assortment of cars but these were used for hot laps driven by touring car driver Tom Onslow-Cole. The cars had sticky tyres, lighter wheels and what looked to be bigger brakes. Not sure if the engine was teaked but the car felt really fast. Like others though, didn't buy one, a mk5 Golf Gti just made more sense as the everyday car to me. Always had a soft spot for them after that.

GreatScott2016

2,513 posts

117 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I've always had a soft spot for these. Design wise, I think they've stood up to the test of time quite well, but I agree with the majority of posters that it's an ambitious asking price for sure. Lovely to see nonetheless.

Firebobby

993 posts

68 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I always thought these were a bit fugly especially from the front. The MKII did improve somewhat with the bonnet scoop but still not the best looking "hothatch". £11k plus is very strong money you could pick up an early M135i for that, and have a far and away better experience. IMHO of course.

Vee12V

1,410 posts

189 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
Probably the worst car I've ever driven. And that 's when it was new. Horrendous torque steer, shockingly bad interior plastics, ridiculous bodykit and wing. Really no redeeming features what so ever - apart from the HP numbers (back in the days).

zedx19

3,047 posts

169 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I considered one of these years back, had a look at a few, test drove one and was put off, just didn't feel very hot hatch like to me. I ended up buying a mk2 Focus ST with the 5 cylinder engine, which was brimming with character and felt like a hot hatch, kept it 4 years, loved everyday with it.

11.5k for this seems absolutely bonkers money, it isn't a classic or special in anyway.

Jon_S_Rally

4,452 posts

117 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
Like others, I do quite like these, but would struggle to choose one overs its rivals. It was on my shortlist at one point, but a Megane 250/265 was similar money, so went down that route and don't regret it.

I don't mind the exterior styling, as it's a bit quirky, but the interior lets them down a bit. They're well equipped, but they just don't look very special. I often wondered if, because of it's Focus underpinnings, if you could fit some Recaro seats from an ST or RS to improve it. With a set of wheels and some minor suspension tweaks, it might be a much more convincing package.

As it is, I'd still buy a Megane or, if I needed five doors, a Golf or Focus.

CT05 Nose Cone

26,079 posts

256 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
That front end always made it look a bit "special".

Nickp82

3,958 posts

122 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I’m a big Mazda fan and think the facelift version of these look good. Unfortunately they just don’t drive anywhere near well as the aforementioned competitors, the Megane in particular, which is a shame.

Horsebox Man

107 posts

45 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
The best thing on these was the engine, but it wasn't unknown for them to throw a leg out of bed, the crank is apparently inter-changeable with the Mk3 Focus RS, but happy to be corrected.

mooseracer

2,788 posts

199 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
Another here who got a mk5 Golf instead. A shame as these appeal in a leftfield way.

Firebobby

993 posts

68 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
CT05 Nose Cone said:
That front end always made it look a bit "special".
Yeah, special needs!

dunnoreally

1,356 posts

137 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
I'm rather fond of mine. Little bit of a blunt instrument and the reduced torque in 1st and 2nd is somewhat weird, but it has a sort of "rawness" to it that I quite like while still being pretty practical. Saying that, I do have a bit of a thing for Japanese cars over European stuff, and I won't pretend that didn't influence my buying decision.

Also, I didn't pay this much for it even given I bought during COVID!

Gecko1978

12,302 posts

186 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2024
quotequote all
dunnoreally said:
I'm rather fond of mine. Little bit of a blunt instrument and the reduced torque in 1st and 2nd is somewhat weird, but it has a sort of "rawness" to it that I quite like while still being pretty practical. Saying that, I do have a bit of a thing for Japanese cars over European stuff, and I won't pretend that didn't influence my buying decision.

Also, I didn't pay this much for it even given I bought during COVID!
There is a 4k one on PH surely a better buy as a second or 3rd car an just enjoy it an not worry