RE: 2025 Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | PH Review
RE: 2025 Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | PH Review
Monday 27th January

2025 Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | PH Review

Another month, another Cupra SUV. How does this European COTY contender fare on the PH-o-meter?


The Renault 5 winning Car of the Year was no shock. That its victory wasn’t a total wipeout perhaps invoked at least a little surprise, however. Here’s a car that’s swiping just about every piece of silverware it’s eligible for, yet it didn’t completely run away with Europe’s biggest gong.

Among the cars snipping points from its (still impressive) lead was this, the new Cupra Terramar. It’s an interesting member of the seven COTY ’25 finalists for a couple of reasons; chiefly, it appears a very conventional, ICE-led crossover with no great innovation to its name. It’s also a performance car, at least in terms of the brand that has designed and engineered it. Such things are a relative rarity on the COTY shortlists and even rarer winners – ignoring the Alpine A290 sharing the R5’s spoils this year.

Since the Porsche 928’s victory in 1978, we’ve seen a bronze for the ND MX-5 (in 2016) and silver for the Toyota GT86/Subaru BRZ (2013) and Alpine A110 (2019), the latter joint-first on points but losing a tie-break to the Jaguar I-Pace. Car of the Year is broadly a competition of worthiness, the now iconic BMW Mini even ceding a place on the podium to the Fiat Stilo back in the early '00s. Yes, really. 

Seven judges put this latest Cupra top of the pile, though, two of them awarding it the full ten points. Which is a match for the R5. The COTY website is something of a rabbit hole; reading each judge’s comments an oddly enthralling activity. And the signpost of a refreshingly open organisation in an age of conspiracy and misinformation. One Belgian journalist recollects an amusing drive in the Terramar on a snowy circuit, while an Austrian describes its mixture of performance and practicality as “a surf’n’turf of desires a la Cupra”.

So perhaps this is more than ‘yet another SUV’ in Cupra’s line-up, the Terramar a startling fourth crossover to sit – or rather stand – beside the Born EV and Leon hatch and estate. Its surf’n’turf approach means a broad mix of powertrains: mild-hybrid 1.5s, pure-petrol 2.0s and a 1.5-litre PHEV that offers around 70 miles of electric-only range if you’re light-footed. The one that pings loudest on the PHometer is this: a 265hp 2.0-litre TSI allied exclusively to 4WD and a DSG ‘box (in fact, like the Tiguan it shares its engines with, the Terramar range is a manual-free zone).

With 1,750 kilos to shift, it’s no outright performance car. But the stats are decent: 0-62mph in 5.9 seconds, a 151mph top speed and 33mpg economy. Someway off the plug-in car’s 565mpg claims, but significantly easier to achieve in the real world. DCC adaptive damping is standard with this engine, too, going at least some of the way to justifying a stocky £45,095 starting price – or over fifty grand in the America’s Cup edition trim we’ve tried. Inevitably some of the COTY judges’ criticism related to its pricing, but then the latest Skodiaq vRS, near-as-dammit the same car in a different suit, is more expensive still…

And this really does feel like a premium object. Comfort and luxury are where it makes its big first impression. The dashboard materials feel plusher than the Group crossover norm, despite the Volkswagen ID-esque gear selector stalk. Dwindling automatic gear selector diversity is a surprisingly sad industry trend, but here it at least clears up space for cupholders and charging pads. Tantalisingly ahead of them is the ‘ESC off’ button, pride of place by the hazard warning lights and an actual physical prod rather than the sub-menu treasure hunt of its numerous cousins.

The overall cabin aesthetic exudes some welcome quirkiness too, with artistic twists and turns that bring a much more interesting vibe than a Formentor or Leon even if some of the copper detailing and the holiday-tattoo badge are arguably OTT. Crucially it doesn't feel anything like a Seat in here.

There’s plentiful room, with rear seats that slide, recline and fold and a boot unimpeded by battery gubbins. Its 642 litres of overall volume whups the PHEV’s 490 and pips a Leon Estate, too. While it carries a much boxier silhouette than a Formentor, I rather like that it’s not ashamed of being an SUV, no superfluous attempt to coupéfy its roof line. It cuts a handsomely pragmatic shape in profile, one elevated by smart creases and just enough tension to look sporty without overdoing it. It's just a shame the day-glo greens, yellows, and oranges worn by Cupras of yore have been replaced by half a dozen shades of grey. A clear reflection that its buyers are more mature and familial than the Club 18-30 audience of an old Ibiza hot hatch…

If that feels like a lot of design chat, it’s with reason. This is a smart handling, brisk accelerating SUV with enough driver nous to elevate it above a good portion of its rivals. But it’s also very ‘quick MQB by numbers’. Which is much more praise than it is criticism, this being a car that scythes through turns tidily enough for its size and shape. It just springs no surprises dynamically and doesn’t demonstrate a notably different character to its platform-mates.

While you’ll sense its mass in corners, it turns in sharply and intuitively and you can get back on the power immediately, the Terramar scurrying smartly and obediently forwards. Its 4Drive system is safely set up even with the ESC loosened, but it’s as dynamic as a 1.7-ton family car ever needs to be and understeer will be clumsily sought out.

It rides very competently too, at least on Spanish roads, its pleasingly standard DCC offering plenty of breadth. Comfort mode is precisely that, with real sophistication to its damping. The tension cranks up accordingly through its drive modes, although this is a car that remains satisfying to drive without a single button press. A neat trick pulled off by my own Hyundai i20N, in which I mostly bumble around without a single N-button press because it’s so sorted right out the box.

I don’t mind the augmented engine noise that comes with the Terramar’s racier modes, however, the bassy rumble adding some welcome depth below the TSI’s revs. While you’re not fully trusted with redline, manual-mode upchanges, this is an engine with a whopping great power band whose seven speeds are fun to take charge of. Its small, plasticky paddles may seem meek when the rest of the materials impress so much, but they’re the exact same ones used in Cupra’s latest TCR racecar. Should very geeky pub boasts be your thing. 

More pertinently, an ever-so-slightly elongated hold of the downshift paddle drops you straight to the lowest possible gear. Not every performance car does this and it’s a nice, if slightly incongruous touch in a broadly sensible SUV. If people like us target a car like this to settle a marital feud or wring the most from a company car scheme, then such tantalising flourishes are exactly what we want. The Terramar’s overall impression is every bit as premium as an X1 or Q3 - if not more so - while it exhibits some of the handling chutzpah they lack. It would have made a controversial Car of the Year alongside the eminently more charming and innovative R5. But as a Car of Numerous Talents, it might just fulfil more PHers' criteria than you’d dare imagine.


SPECIFICATION | 2025 CUPRA TERRAMAR 2.0 TSI 265PS 4DRIVE

Engine: 1,984cc, four-cyl turbo
Transmission: 7-speed DSG auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 265@5,000-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@1,650-6,500rpm
0-62mph: 5.9 seconds
Top speed: 151mph
Weight: 1,750kg
MPG: 32.1-33.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 193g/km (WLTP)
Price: from £45,095

Author
Discussion

Craikeybaby

Original Poster:

11,568 posts

242 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
How does it fare on the community rating? Nobody knows as it isn’t included… Are PH/Seat scared that it would get a low rating?

DaveyBoyWonder

3,264 posts

191 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Generic SUV shaped thing with an iffy paint job and an equally generic interior with the usual ipad stuck on the dash. The only thing that even marginally tingles anything inside me about that is that its actually got a petrol engine.

Rusty Old-Banger

5,947 posts

230 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Generic VAG offering, with the ubiquitous VAG 2.0T, and a £50k price tab.

As boring as a brown thing on an October day in Birmingham.


fantheman80

2,102 posts

66 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Generic VAG offering, with the ubiquitous VAG 2.0T, and a £50k price tab.
I was thinking this, pecking order in play here with that E888, not even getting the 300bhp+ state of tune in what is supposed to be the performance brand.

Cupra is sadly a re-frocking arm of VAG like the others - what i had hoped was some bespoke models. Is just a different shell with matte paint and copper on the same MQB platform's with the same engines. The Born looks good but is an ID3 i believe with some bronzing - Formentor looks great, but sits on the same Tiguan (or some other thing beginning with T) platform

Motormouth88

626 posts

77 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
“Hey AI, design me a car”

B10

1,340 posts

284 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Another effing SUV.

HazzaT

563 posts

62 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
"Hey, let's make a proper sporty brand using the performance trim from SEAT"

"Great idea, do we have any sports cars or GTs lined up?"

"No, just a hatchback and two family SUVs with 1.5 and 2.0 4 pots"


Rusty Old-Banger

5,947 posts

230 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
And comparing to an X1 or Q3? Big wow.

ChrisCh86

1,057 posts

61 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
What an awful grey overweight blob.

Are a few pieces of copper trim and a slightly silly name really enough to give this appeal over every other grey blob on the road?

Deessee

57 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Why do VAG brands skimp on covering exposed metal on the interior window surrounds? They’re not the only ones, granted, but all the ‘perceived quality’ nonsense is undermined by not spending what must amount to <fiver per car at scale to deliver on aspirations to be a more upmarket choice. I’m sure some drivers don’t give a hoot, but when RRPs are so high there’s no excuse for such blatant production cost cutting.

As has been said above, it’s the Cupra C-GPT. At least they’re having a go at jazzing the thing up.

Byker28i

77,481 posts

234 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Are we bad to Speed Matters? biggrin

Not a mention of the sexy rear lights and the new trend to have light up badges.

Also the claim it beats the Leon Estate boot size is meh, the Leon is 640 litres, compared to this claimed 642 litres, so effectively the same, but it should be noted the Cupra website says it's 540 litres, up to 630 if you slide the rear seats forward on the petrol ones. On the hybrid it's down to 450 litres.



scrapped

79 posts

38 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
B10 said:
Another effing SUV.


Well quite.

I'm waiting for all these suburban customers to realise that absolutely no one thinks their SUV conveys an 'adventurous lifestyle'.

In the meantime, the new car market becomes yet more homogenous and boring.

Firebobby

848 posts

56 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Jesus H Christ, how many more boring SUV's can VAG come up with? What a load of old Tommy rot!

fantheman80

2,102 posts

66 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
scrapped said:
I'm waiting for all these suburban customers to realise that absolutely no one thinks their SUV conveys an 'adventurous lifestyle'.
I don't think the majority of people buy SUVs to give that impression. I think they buy them as its perceived to be more practical, easier to get kids in the back, higher ride 'feels' a bit safer - boot space is not that much bigger if bigger than a hatch

I have zero issue with SUVs, but I think its sad Cupra had a bit of promise when launched but is really a matte paint, copper bits peddler of samey SUVs

Kawasaki2000

21 posts

8 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
scrapped said:


Well quite.

I'm waiting for all these suburban customers to realise that absolutely no one thinks their SUV conveys an 'adventurous lifestyle'.

In the meantime, the new car market becomes yet more homogenous and boring.
What on earth make you think buyers buy these to indicate an 'adventurous lifestyle'. I bought a Formentor because I liked the looks. It was a reasonable price and it was the right size.

The saloon isn't coming back anytime soon. We'd be better of waiting for PH commenters to get the message that SUVs are what the market wants and that designers aren't really worried about what the average PHer wants in a car.


Byker28i

77,481 posts

234 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Kawasaki2000 said:
scrapped said:


Well quite.

I'm waiting for all these suburban customers to realise that absolutely no one thinks their SUV conveys an 'adventurous lifestyle'.

In the meantime, the new car market becomes yet more homogenous and boring.
What on earth make you think buyers buy these to indicate an 'adventurous lifestyle'. I bought a Formentor because I liked the looks. It was a reasonable price and it was the right size.

The saloon isn't coming back anytime soon. We'd be better of waiting for PH commenters to get the message that SUVs are what the market wants and that designers aren't really worried about what the average PHer wants in a car.

Not what I want, I have a Seat Leon Estate wink

Chris Peacock

3,319 posts

151 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
scrapped said:
I'm waiting for all these suburban customers to realise that absolutely no one thinks their SUV conveys an 'adventurous lifestyle'.
You've been watching too many TV adverts.

Most people just buy a practical family car they like the look of and fits their budget.

je777

746 posts

121 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Isn't being a European COTY virtually a guarantee of mundanity?

je777

746 posts

121 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
Do SUV owners never watch those car crash videos?
If you do, you quickly realise that SUVs topple at the slightest touch - far easier than 'regular' cars.
Try watching some US videos and see for yourselves.
Manufacturers might claim this and that, but the proof is right there in reality, on video.
As I learned in forensic pathology, a rollover is the most dangerous crash (excepting those where an occupant exits the vehicle).

the-norseman

14,538 posts

188 months

Monday 27th January
quotequote all
I remember being at the Tarraco launch in Barca a fair few years ago, Wayne Griffiths told me were breaking Cupra away as a separate brand, me and Wayne had spoken about doing things similar to VW/Renault Sport, special edition cars more set up for tracks etc (R26R for example) it was exciting times. Mentioned the Audi 5 pot etc.

All as they have really done with Cupra is water it down, stick 1.5 engines in everything. The 2.0 offerings sometimes get the 280-310 power but most get the 265.

I've owned MK1 LCR, MK2 LCR and MK3 Leon cupra amongst other SEAT/FR/Cupra offerings but none of the current lineup get me going really, if I had spare cash sitting around I'd probably buy a Cupra Born as a daily as electric usage suits me these days but that would be it.

This should have either the 2.0 300+ engine combined with a electric motor or something similar.