RE: 2027 Polestar 5 Performance | UK Review
RE: 2027 Polestar 5 Performance | UK Review
Tuesday 6th October

2027 Polestar 5 Performance | UK Review

The 884hp, £105k Polestar supersaloon meets wet UK roads. Still a success?


Forgive the cliché, but the Polestar 5 looks otherworldly on UK tarmac. No wonder they’ve fitted that private plate. It’s the firm’s first fully ground-up car, and on styling alone it comprehensively sticks the landing. After a decade and a half of EVs flip-flopping between bold, pioneering design (original BMW i3) and something warm and familiar (um, the latest BMW i3), here’s a car that treads its own path without fear. There are lots of signature Polestar design touches on a shape that needs seeing to truly believe; unlike the Swedes’ other fully electric models, this one doesn’t indecisively straddle a line between saloon and crossover. It’s unabashed about its positioning as a traditional four-door grand tourer.

Albeit one with ungodly amounts of power. Bossman Nic drove the entry-level (!) 748hp dual-motor, passively damped car on sunny European tarmac in the summer. Damp, autumnal roads inevitably host our UK first drive in the halo 884hp Polestar 5 Performance with its clever MagneRide dampers, adjustable through three levels on the touchscreen but adapting to the surface centimetre by centimetre beneath you.

Much of the car’s R&D was carried out by a UK-based team in Coventry and around MIRA – peaking at 500 folks at one point before being poignantly disbanded once the project approached the finish line – with all the usual know-how forged in Formula 1 and in the products of Aston, JLR, Lotus and McLaren, among others. Senior chassis engineer Joakim Rydholm concluded the development programme on a drive in Germany, where the ideal balance of comfort and precision was struck on a winding backroad, his arms immediately prickling with goosebumps. He beams when recollecting it. Joakim was on the small team that honed the fabulous Polestar 1 and he rallies a Mitsubishi Evo X in his spare time. I was already excited to dig beneath the 5’s spectacular surface – knowing the person who signed off its chassis is so clearly ‘one of us’ only ramps up the anticipation.

While the car tips the scales at 2,500kg – its 112kWh battery no doubt taking a lot of responsibility – there’s still lightweighting where possible. The chassis is bonded aluminium (and makes the 5 twice as stiff as a Polestar 3), there’s aluminium centres amid its enormous brake discs, while inside there’s lots of Bcomp, a sustainable carbonfibre alternative that recycles at the end of its life. About an eighth of the body and chassis calls upon recycled aluminium. As ever, Polestar has made a lengthy report of the car’s lifetime climate impact publicly available – of its predicted 30.1 tonnes of CO2 emissions, 23.8 come from its production. A smaller number than the lighter, slower Polestar 2, just to prove the rate of progress.

So it nails the Polestar basics, even if it’s another model produced in China rather than Scandinavia. Climb inside – through slinky frameless doors – and it feels wholly familiar too, right down to the firm’s classy signature font that’s used with gratifying uniformity across each surface and display it occupies. Yep, a massive portrait touchscreen dominates and takes a good while to wrap your head around, although shortcuts can be easily fixed on its homepage. Adjusting the reach of its rim with a combo of screen and glossy steering wheel buttons feels an unbelievable faff, but then most owners will only do so once. Likewise the side mirrors.

The fab Recaro seats quickly make amends, though, and they drop reasonably low by EV standards to nestle you nicely in the car. Visibility is good with the inevitable caveat of a rear window being ditched in favour of a camera feed. Better for torsional rigidity, however, and unless the camera goes wrong further into the 5’s future, I think you’ll adjust. Though some drivers with varifocals don’t seem as taken with the setup. Perhaps one to interrogate on a test drive…

This Performance setup – as per the performance EV standard – is bonkers on a British B road. No one truly needs 884hp or a 3.1-second sprint to sixty-two, and a few seconds at full throttle only hammers that point home. A true sign of this car’s deep reservoir of performance comes from relaxing the throttle mid-acceleration before promptly nestling it back into the carpet – the endorphins flow even greater, the force somehow stronger. It’s mad.

And yet it’s utterly useable. Joakim and his team spent 5,000 hours alone developing the Polestar-specific compound of its Michelins, and Lord knows how many more tuning such wonderful linearity and precision into the throttle. Likewise, the steering; while it doesn’t brim with old-school feel or fidelity, it lightly and accurately flicks the nose into bends with a rate that mirrors the response of your other key controls. The nerdy level to which this powertrain and chassis have been developed is always obvious.

Our car rode on optional 22-inch wheels, and I suspect keen drivers will want the standard 21s. The ride is damn good, actually, and its billing as a GT car feels right. There’s no vast difference between its three on-screen parameters, though Joakim’s goosebumps arrived in the midmost ‘Nimble’ setting.

The 5 slinks down narrow, single-track roads with surprising ease, though you become acutely aware of its length and footprint on corner exit. It’ll squirm around happily on moist tarmac, most notably in its looser ESC Sport mode, and without the Michelins warmed through it can behave like an F10 M5 on full throttle in a straight line. When I consult Joakim over a coffee on how much freedom the Sport setting allows, he grins and says: “You’ve made a choice to select that mode”. Ever the rally driver.

Warmer roads and rubber reveal a near-infallible level of grip and traction, however, and a car that deploys its doolally outputs with professionalism yet engagement. It’s a GT first and foremost, but dips its feet confidently into the world of the muscular sports saloon and ought to give the new Jaguar Type 01 a stern challenge should we ever get the two together. While likely being an easier going, more useable thing four-up, the vast panoramic roof of the 5 negates any lost daylight from its closed rear.

Polestar shuns fake noise or gears but there’s enough precision coursing through its controls for you to not feel bereft without them. Honed by Brits and made in China, there’s nevertheless a hushed, Swedish modesty to its swagger down a road. 

Is this Performance worth £15,450 more than the ‘base’ Dual Motor? A brief stint in the latter reveals little let-up in its performance and its passive damping nicely mirrors the softest setting of the more muscular 5’s MagneRide. Day-to-day, you won’t miss all the bombast of the halo car. Whether you need it is more of a philosophical question, I think. Will the team consider a lighter, single-motor rear-drive car? Perhaps. 

Joakim describes the 5 as a “dream project”; his team benchmarked the Porsche Taycan and Panamera, Audi e-tron GT and the hybrid BMW M5. The Polestar 5 treads its own path amongst them, its broadly supple ride, bombastic performance and potential for quite visceral entertainment perhaps a lovely amalgamation of all their best bits. 

UK boss Matt Galvin has no sales targets and admits the 5 will perform a halo role as much as anything – not least with an all-new Polestar 2 coming next year to mop up any volume aspirations. If demand flows strongly for the 5, its supply will be managed in an attempt to shore up its residual values. Because ultimately this is a car that only attracts major criticism by the usual, fast EV parameters: its silly surplus of performance in everyday conditions, its enormous weight figure and the question mark over how much it’ll still be worth a few years down the line. The Polestar 5 is otherwise every bit as beguiling an experience as its spacecraft looks suggest.


SPECIFICATION | 2027 POLESTAR 5 PERFORMANCE

Engine: Dual electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 884
Torque (lb ft): 749
0-62mph: 3.1secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 2,500kg
Battery: 800V, 112kWh capacity
Efficiency/range: 2.9mi/kWh, 346 miles
Max DC charging: 350kW; 10-80% charge in 22mins
Price: £104,950

 

Author
Discussion

Twoshoe

Original Poster:

1,003 posts

214 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Other than a slightly bulky rear end, I think that looks fantastic. 9/10. And it's a saloon, not another bloody SUV - hurrah!

Groaver

84 posts

63 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
It's got great presence at the front, in those pictures.
The back end I am not convinced on.

howardhughes

1,415 posts

234 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...

Pereldh

821 posts

142 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
The car Ferrari Luce could have been.

But no, John Elkann wanted Ugly.

Familymad

2,328 posts

247 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
It’s a looker. Bit wide for UK B roads. I’m intrigued as to how these do used. A cracking buy once the initial hit has been taken.

SDK

3,563 posts

283 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
For me, this is the best looking new car on sale today and if I had the funds it would be an instant buy.

I was one of the early owners of the Polestar 2 in 2020, and potentially ordering a Polestar 4 SUV or Coupe in a few weeks.

andy43

13,225 posts

284 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Pereldh said:
The car Ferrari Luce could have been.

But no, John Elkann wanted Ugly.
Very good point. Tweak those headlights so they’re a bit more 458…

Don’t really see how it’s moved the game on much since my 2018 700+ bhp Tesla though - range, 0-60 etc aren’t much different but I’m guessing it’ll handle better.
Especially as it’s got “more torsional rigidity” from having no back window rolleyes

Sway

35,189 posts

224 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...
Would you prefer them to never review anything that isn't ICE?

Cause that's gonna get real boring...

samoht

7,260 posts

176 months

Tuesday
quotequote all

Sat in one at Bicester, the rear seats feel a class or two above those in a Taycan as a spacious, nice place to be.

Really cool car and somehow cooler for the fact that the new boss would never have greenlit this car in a month of Sundays, it's the last hurrah of the old craziness. Love it, hopefully get a chance to drive one sometime.


leglessAlex

7,357 posts

171 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Familymad said:
It s a looker. Bit wide for UK B roads. I m intrigued as to how these do used. A cracking buy once the initial hit has been taken.
It's a big old thing, but it's narrower than the Taycan it's competing with.

Widths, including mirrors:

Taycan: 2,144mm
Polestar 5: 2,063mm

And just for comparison a couple of other large cars:

Volvo ES90: 2,120mm
Polestar 4 SUV: 2,139mm
Merc EQS: 2,138mm

I think it looks absolutely cracking, well done the designers. Okay, the no rear window is a bit meh, but that's one of the very few things that isn't quite right.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Superb looking thing. As someone else has said, lets rejoice about the fact its not a 3t box shaped SUV. Better looking than a Taycan, a fraction of the price and far better looking than the Luce.

Downsides? I hope you can remove all the little labels telling you what it is/what its made from.

Bluehorseshoe

204 posts

5 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
The IM5 Performance is nearly as quick for under half the money, and the Polestar 5 wins on power, torque, battery size and build.

Stats copied from a table made in Ai show Polestar then MG

Polestar 5 Performance
MG IM5 Performance
Power
884 hp
741 bhp
Torque
749 lb ft
592 lb ft
0-62mph
3.1s
3.2s
Top speed
155mph
166mph
Weight
2,500kg
2,298kg
Battery
112kWh, 800V
100kWh gross (96.5kWh net)
Range
346 miles
356 miles
Efficiency
2.9mi/kWh
about 3.7mi/kWh (27kWh/100mi)
10-80% charge
22 mins (350kW max)
17 mins (max kW not confirmed)
Price
£104,950
from £48,495

Straight-line speed: The Polestar has 143hp and 157 lb ft more, but it is also about 200kg heavier. The result is only a 0.1s advantage to 62mph.

Efficiency: The MG is clearly more efficient, so it gets slightly more range from a smaller battery. The two range figures may not be measured the same way, so treat that gap loosely.

Charging: The MG's 10-80% time is quicker on paper, even though the Polestar has the higher 350kW peak.

Price: The Polestar costs £56,455 more, over double the MG's price. That money buys the extra power, bigger battery, and premium build and brand rather than much real-world pace.
The IM5 figures are UK-market numbers from several sources that don't fully agree, for example top speed is quoted as 166 or 167mph.

Sources: Fleet News IM5 Performance, Encycarpedia IM5 Performance, Carscoops

Basically the above highlights an expensive EV often does little a cheaper one won't. Both are nice looking saloons but if i was paying I would take the MG as an example and then buy a second thing...(this is not how life actually works but you get the idea)

J4CKO

46,879 posts

230 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...
Yeah, we can, that is what is happening.

Motoring is a broad church, some folk have electric cars, some have petrol or diesel, things change.

If PH went just ICE, it would wither away as all those who only like V8s die off, would be a bad decision not to encompass what is going to be the main power source for personal transport.

I blow hot and cold on EV's but 3 to 4 times greater efficiency when diesel is 2.02.9 a litre as I saw yesterday and petrol £1.75.9 it does make you think. Governments and oil rich nations are doing their best to kill their golden goose here.

Cryssys

929 posts

68 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Is lightweighting a real word?

leglessAlex

7,357 posts

171 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Bluehorseshoe said:
Basically the above highlights an expensive EV often does little a cheaper one won't. Both are nice looking saloons but if i was paying I would take the MG as an example and then buy a second thing...(this is not how life actually works but you get the idea)
But that's often been the case for ICE cars, and things like interior quality and how they drive is usually the difference.

I absolutely accept this might not be the case as I haven't been in either car, but if I had to guess, I'd say the Polestar is a better car to drive and a substantially nicer place to be than the IM5.

SDK

3,563 posts

283 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Bluehorseshoe said:
The IM5 Performance is nearly as quick for under half the money, and the Polestar 5 wins on power, torque, battery size and build.

Stats copied from a table made in Ai show Polestar then MG

Polestar 5 Performance
MG IM5 Performance
Power
884 hp
741 bhp
Torque
749 lb ft
592 lb ft
0-62mph
3.1s
3.2s
Top speed
155mph
166mph
Weight
2,500kg
2,298kg
Battery
112kWh, 800V
100kWh gross (96.5kWh net)
Range
346 miles
356 miles
Efficiency
2.9mi/kWh
about 3.7mi/kWh (27kWh/100mi)
10-80% charge
22 mins (350kW max)
17 mins (max kW not confirmed)
Price
£104,950
from £48,495

Straight-line speed: The Polestar has 143hp and 157 lb ft more, but it is also about 200kg heavier. The result is only a 0.1s advantage to 62mph.

Efficiency: The MG is clearly more efficient, so it gets slightly more range from a smaller battery. The two range figures may not be measured the same way, so treat that gap loosely.

Charging: The MG's 10-80% time is quicker on paper, even though the Polestar has the higher 350kW peak.

Price: The Polestar costs £56,455 more, over double the MG's price. That money buys the extra power, bigger battery, and premium build and brand rather than much real-world pace.
The IM5 figures are UK-market numbers from several sources that don't fully agree, for example top speed is quoted as 166 or 167mph.

Sources: Fleet News IM5 Performance, Encycarpedia IM5 Performance, Carscoops

Basically the above highlights an expensive EV often does little a cheaper one won't. Both are nice looking saloons but if i was paying I would take the MG as an example and then buy a second thing...(this is not how life actually works but you get the idea)
I recently test drove a MG IM5 and IM6.
They are good cars for the lower value end, but nothing like this P5, which is several steps up in size and luxury.

E.g. I couldn’t get the DAB radio to work in both the IM5 & 6 and it seems an issue in UK, for a long time already.

Murph7355

41,990 posts

286 months

Tuesday
quotequote all

howardhughes said:
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...
Yawn.

Pray tell was your preferred steed a Nissan Micra, Toyota Starlet or Vauchall Corsa in the halcyon days of ICE motoring?

And how's the price of running a diesel powered driving dream now?

biggrin

samoht

7,260 posts

176 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Bluehorseshoe said:
The IM5 Performance is nearly as quick for under half the money
Yes, and a McDonald's meal has nearly as many calories as a Michelin starred restaurant.

It's the fine judgement behind calibration of steering, braking and the other controls, the quality of the damping and a million other tiny details that make a car satisfying and fulfilling to drive on a real road, rather than merely the CarWow runway.

PorkerHam

190 posts

72 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...
Yes they can. They can do what they want - it's their website.
They can call it 'Luxury Yachting' if they feel so inclined.
It's a car website. The majority of new cars released these days are EVs.

otolith

69,091 posts

234 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
howardhughes said:
Sooner or later you guys are going to have to make a decision. It's either 'PISTONHEADS' or 'WHICH?'

You can't have it both ways...
Yeah, we can, that is what is happening.

Motoring is a broad church, some folk have electric cars, some have petrol or diesel, things change.

If PH went just ICE, it would wither away as all those who only like V8s die off, would be a bad decision not to encompass what is going to be the main power source for personal transport.

I blow hot and cold on EV's but 3 to 4 times greater efficiency when diesel is 2.02.9 a litre as I saw yesterday and petrol £1.75.9 it does make you think. Governments and oil rich nations are doing their best to kill their golden goose here.
Plus, they would have to change the tagline to "Slow Matters"