Vista and AutoCad?

Author
Discussion

job38

Original Poster:

1,968 posts

238 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Anyone know if Vista can run AutoCad?

(I do Macs so I'm not up on these things)

jamieboy

5,911 posts

231 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Don't know the answer, but if you have an XP machine with AutoCad installed then you can run Microsoft's Vista Upgrade Advisor - although it's primarily to tell you if your hardware is up to scratch, it also tells you if any of the applications on your machine are known to have issues.

PJ S

10,842 posts

229 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
I'd be surprised if it does.
But then again........
Have you checked AutoCad's site to see if there's any info on Vista updates or compatibility?

Neil_Bolton

17,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
rofl

You are having a laugh aren't you?

It took them over a year to roll out an XP compatible version, and they still refuse to acknowledge Terminal Services.

Seeing as Vista isn't yet released, and graphics drivers for Vista (you need true OpenGL support IIRC) are sketchy at best, I'd be leaving it well alone...

Let someone else do the work in trying to make it work, and never EVER use unproven software in a production environment.


Edited by Neil_Bolton on Tuesday 30th January 12:00

jamieboy

5,911 posts

231 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Neil_Bolton said:
Seeing as Vista isn't yet released

confused [checks date] confused

job38

Original Poster:

1,968 posts

238 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
That's odd, because I have a copy of Vista in my mits right now. confused

Anyway, one reseller says no, another says yes. spin
They both claim AutoCad 2008, released in March will be fully compatable. Quality software at its very best rolleyes

So, I'm going to give it a go and see what happens............

Neil_Bolton

17,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
Neil_Bolton said:
Seeing as Vista isn't yet released

confused [checks date] confused

Oops, of course its the end of January now

My apologies...

Carry on.

Still, don't expect Autocad to work - they are renowned for a long time to roll out updates.

Neil_Bolton

17,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
job38 said:
They both claim AutoCad 2008, released in March will be fully compatable. Quality software at its very best rolleyes

So, I'm going to give it a go and see what happens............


I'd be careful, you wouldn't want any drawings or templates to go tits up for whatever reason, test test test if I were you.

Additionally consider that performance will be considerably impacted unless you have correct drivers for your graphics card.

Otherwise have fun - it WILL ask for your permission to do something EVERY FIVE SECONDS! AutoCad required admin permissions on many of its files, and needs installing and running usually under an admin account.

With Vista, you can't do this any more because of the new security functionality mad

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

261 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Right click on the icon and select "Run as administrator" from the context menu, or set it in the properties to always run with admin rights if that is what is required.

rich-uk

1,431 posts

258 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Neil_Bolton said:

With Vista, you can't do this any more because of the new security functionality mad


You can tuen that off.

I have yet to see any reason to upgrade to Vista from XP apart from the flashy interface and I've been running it for the last few months.

Brink

1,505 posts

210 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Try BricsCad on Linux. Cheaper.

Neil_Bolton

17,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
rich-uk said:
Neil_Bolton said:

With Vista, you can't do this any more because of the new security functionality mad


You can tuen that off.

I have yet to see any reason to upgrade to Vista from XP apart from the flashy interface and I've been running it for the last few months.


I have to agree, bar the knobs and whistles of the Media management and graphics, theres no compelling reason to change.

I won't be upgrading in a corporate sense for a VERY long time I should think, XP does exactly what it says on the tin, and well.

Not to say I want to run Vista at home, however, annoyingly I brought a Nvidia 8800 GTS card to take advantage of the Direct X 10 stuff when it is released, and there are drivers for it yet mad





Edited by Neil_Bolton on Tuesday 30th January 13:05

Neil_Bolton

17,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Brink said:
Try BricsCad on Linux. Cheaper.


Thats lovely.

If you ignore the training costs, the fact that (unless it creates .dwg or .dwf files) nobody else will be using it, there will be ready made element packs available, and the main fact that you have to run linux, its great.

AutoCad and Microstation are kings because they are established, and everyone uses em'.


Brink

1,505 posts

210 months

Tuesday 30th January 2007
quotequote all
Neil_Bolton said:
Brink said:
Try BricsCad on Linux. Cheaper.


Thats lovely.

If you ignore the training costs, the fact that (unless it creates .dwg or .dwf files) nobody else will be using it, there will be ready made element packs available, and the main fact that you have to run linux, its great.

AutoCad and Microstation are kings because they are established, and everyone uses em'.




The lastest version has an AutoCAD lookalike interface AND does the files too. Cost = 99 euros.

Mind you, this info is third hand... so could be a load of.


Edited by Brink on Tuesday 30th January 13:12

job38

Original Poster:

1,968 posts

238 months

Wednesday 31st January 2007
quotequote all
I can happily confirm that AutoCad 2004 runs on Vista bowtie