how to remove double shadows on panoramics

how to remove double shadows on panoramics

Author
Discussion

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Wednesday 18th April 2007
quotequote all
well the competition is encouraging me to process some of the panoramics i have stored on my cpu but i have come across a stumbling block and i would like some help.

after doing a 5% test of a 360 pano in autostitch (to check it would work), i got autostitch started on soing a full size version. 2 hours later and it had just finished!!!!! in the main it has worked, but there is some strange overlap around my girlfriend in the foreground and i dont know how to get rid of it. i presume it is because she may have been in 2 slightly different poses in the 2 pictures that have her in (i have learnt to give autostitch lots of overlap to play with).

i guess it may be possible to cut her out of one of the original photos and stitch it again (assuming there is overlap), but i would prefer not to give my cpu another 2 hour crippling job if it can be avoided.

can anyone help?

this is a close up of sarah showing the strange effect. as it has "ghosted" her, i am having lots of problems bring her top half back to looking normal.



this is where the full size image is. i dont think flickr likes the fact that it is 15 times longer than it is wide though so you cna only see it when you go to the full size page.

www.flickr.com/photos/speedychrissie/464437620/

if you know how to sort out htis problem could you please just give me some hints and i will try and sort it myself (unless you are very bored and want to try for yourself)

cheers
chris

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
can anyone help? i know people have been looking at the links. surely someone can give me some little insight into fixing this?

Rednut05

9,173 posts

215 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I know nothing about Autostitch, but if it's only the area surrounding her that is the problem, then I'd load the photo up in Photoshop and clone the area.

Quick five minutes;



David

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
cheers for that, but thats not the main problem i was talking about. the main thing is that sarahs top half is almost see-through.

UncleDave

7,155 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Surely you can Photoshop that part of the photo yourself.. just cut it out of the original and paste it in?

I can have a go if you can point me t' the right files.

Rednut05

9,173 posts

215 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
speedychrissie said:
cheers for that, but thats not the main problem i was talking about. the main thing is that sarahs top half is almost see-through.


Yeah did think that her top half being see through was a wee bit odd.

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
UncleDave said:
Surely you can Photoshop that part of the photo yourself.. just cut it out of the original and paste it in?

I can have a go if you can point me t' the right files.



see that is the kind ol lateral thinking i was looking for. that should work, cheers.

_dobbo_

14,488 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Out of interest what ISO was that shot at? It looks very noisy... And your sensor needs a clean!

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Out of interest what ISO was that shot at? It looks very noisy... And your sensor needs a clean!



yeah i know my sensor needs a clean, its quite terrible in those photos.

im fairly sure it was ISO 200. i dont know why it would seem noisy. is it possible that autostitch is the cluprit?

GravelBen

15,749 posts

232 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
I've found a similar effect in some of my panoramas where the overlap area has had a person in it in one of the photos but not in the other, could that have happened with yours? ie included one in the set which has that part but without her in it? it shows up more with a lighter colour behind the object/person like sky or water. The other effect, the area around the edges of her I also got in some panoramas where the same object was in different original shots but at a slightly different angle as I'd moved a bit when I turned to take the shots. It was also much worse when the same object was in 3 shots rather than 2, so I ran autostitch again with only the photos I needed in it,avoiding excess overlap between multiple photos, and it came out much cleaner and sharper.


Edited by GravelBen on Friday 20th April 05:41

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
could that have happened with yours?


that is a possibility, i might have to check that. cheers

it is also quite possible that i moved between taking photos as i was doing this panoramic by hand rather than on a tripod.

size13

2,032 posts

259 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
UncleDave said:
Surely you can Photoshop that part of the photo yourself.. just cut it out of the original and paste it in?

I can have a go if you can point me t' the right files.

I was just about to suggest the same thing - take that bit from the original image

UncleDave

7,155 posts

233 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
Did it work?

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
UncleDave said:
Did it work?


be patient young lad!

i havent got around to doing it yet. i will do it this evening after doing the washing up.

speedychrissie

Original Poster:

2,994 posts

241 months

Friday 20th April 2007
quotequote all
well i have had a go at chopping out the bad part from one of hte original photos and pasting it over the panoramic and it has worked to an extent. i still have some blending to do but i think it is much better than it was with the transparency.

a strange phenomenon though:
autostitch seems to have increased the size of the panoramic! i had to increase the number of pixels in the bit i was pasting onto the panoramic to get it to lay right. this might explain why the picture looks a bit grainy as that process is likely to add more noise. very odd though, i just dont know why it would do it.