Selling the assets but not the debts..

Selling the assets but not the debts..

Author
Discussion

john_p

Original Poster:

7,073 posts

251 months

Monday 3rd December 2007
quotequote all
A company that owes me some money has gone into administration.

30 days beforehand the assets were sold to another company for a substantial sum.. of course the purchasing company has the same directors, same line of business etc. And so, as you'd expect, with no assets the original company can't service its debts and has been placed into administration.

They're something like £4m in the hole. Interestingly the statement of affairs does not detail where the purchase price (also about £4m) went..

To my knowledge, they've done this twice before. Amazing how companies can get away with this, really. Given the sums involved I can't believe HMRC just seem to write the amounts off and forget about it. Do they?

I feel I should raise the issue of the £4m or so somewhere.. but I'll probably just chalk this one down to experience.

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Monday 3rd December 2007
quotequote all
Report the wrs

jamesuk28

2,176 posts

254 months

Monday 3rd December 2007
quotequote all
I will wait for someone like Eric to answer this in more detail, but stinks of Phoenix trading to me.

edb49

1,652 posts

206 months

Monday 3rd December 2007
quotequote all
Happens all too often unfortunately. I believe a recourse you have is to prove the directors knew the old company was trading insolvently and get them struck off; this gives you some pressure to put on them to get your fees paid. Not sure though, never done it ourselves.

Eric Mc

122,078 posts

266 months

Monday 3rd December 2007
quotequote all
Very difficult to peove that someone has been trading unlawfully - or even recklessly.

The new Companies Act 2006 has more severe sanctions against Phoenix companies - but I don't know exactly what they are.

arfur

3,871 posts

215 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
jamesuk28 said:
I will wait for someone like Eric to answer this in more detail, but stinks of Phoenix trading to me.
It is ... hard to do anything about. I was mis-sold advertising a few years ago. They were selling plasma adverts in local cinema/theatres ... Paid them for the service and the advert looked good. Shame that they had not sold to the cinemas etc etc ..

By the time I found out they had vanished owning loads and loads. Located their new company and contacted them... Nothing .. Tried again ... nothing ... Called Trading Stadards and the Police .. Nothing .. Tried Trading Standards again ... nothing

It just so happened that I was up in Lancashire and the small detour via the registered office ... Very nice company secratary gave me the addresses of the main directors

Refunded quite quickly once the baseball bat was brought into play

smile

plasticpig

12,932 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
If the directors have not gone through the motions correctly then they may be personally liable to the creditiors. Its very amateurish to transfer assests 30 days beforehand. In a properly structured setup the company that trades owns a minimum of assets in the first place.

john_p

Original Poster:

7,073 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
Based on previous dealings with the company they are well versed in this trick and have used it to buy subsidiaries at least twice to my knowledge.

You can guarantee the IP is on "their side"

I'm just surprised it can be so brazen.

CIS121

1,265 posts

214 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
john_p said:
A company that owes me some money has gone into administration.

30 days beforehand the assets were sold to another company for a substantial sum.. of course the purchasing company has the same directors, same line of business etc. And so, as you'd expect, with no assets the original company can't service its debts and has been placed into administration.

They're something like £4m in the hole. Interestingly the statement of affairs does not detail where the purchase price (also about £4m) went..

To my knowledge, they've done this twice before. Amazing how companies can get away with this, really. Given the sums involved I can't believe HMRC just seem to write the amounts off and forget about it. Do they?

I feel I should raise the issue of the £4m or so somewhere.. but I'll probably just chalk this one down to experience.
I've heard fo this happening a few times. Very suitable if teh original company has a large claimant chasing them in court, but some people simply use it to dump debts out of a company that they've asset stripped. Keep us posted on how you get on!

john_p

Original Poster:

7,073 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
plasticpig said:
If the directors have not gone through the motions correctly then they may be personally liable to the creditiors. Its very amateurish to transfer assests 30 days beforehand. In a properly structured setup the company that trades owns a minimum of assets in the first place.
In fact only 14 days elapsed between the sale of assets and book debts and the debenture holder appointing an administrator.. although this was triggered by the debenture holder (presumably also a shareholder) "withdrawing support" prior to the sale.


jamesuk28

2,176 posts

254 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
john_p said:
plasticpig said:
If the directors have not gone through the motions correctly then they may be personally liable to the creditiors. Its very amateurish to transfer assests 30 days beforehand. In a properly structured setup the company that trades owns a minimum of assets in the first place.
In fact only 14 days elapsed between the sale of assets and book debts and the debenture holder appointing an administrator.. although this was triggered by the debenture holder (presumably also a shareholder) "withdrawing support" prior to the sale.
Thats about textbook. Until the law is really tightened on this expect to see a real increase, its a f******* joke.

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
If the sums are substantial, contact serious fraud office. If they owe you a substantial su, call in the 'scaffolders'.

john_p

Original Poster:

7,073 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th December 2007
quotequote all
johnfm said:
If the sums are substantial, contact serious fraud office. If they owe you a substantial su, call in the 'scaffolders'.
What is "substantial" in this sort of case?

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Have a look at the SFO website - might give you some idea. Good luck with it.