Test driving a car without tax
Discussion
The PM said:
Trade plates are only to be used moving the vehicle from one location to another. When on trade plates only one person can be in the vehicle.
This is not the case, trade plates are in effect moveable road tax for use by motor traders. The should only be used in connection with the traders business activities i.e not to take a vehicle home to use at the weekend etc.Cat
The PM said:
Trade plates are only to be used moving the vehicle from one location to another.
Not correct. A trade licence may be used on a vehicle for any number of reasons - including test drives.The PM said:
When on trade plates only one person can be in the vehicle.
Of course passengers can be carried - so long as it is in connection with a purpose for which the licence was issued.The PM said:
Trade plates are only to be used moving the vehicle from one location to another. When on trade plates only one person can be in the vehicle.
I must have had special trade plates then: luckily they only cost the same as everyone elses rubbish trade plates.There are conditions of course, but vehicle occupancy isnt one. Many people take the piss too, but its down to the issuing VRO to deal with it, not the police.
The car is SORNED. The seller has said he doesn't want to tax it just for a test drive. Which I can kind of understand.
He also said that it would be Ok for me drive the car, because the tax and car is his responsibility. Now if plod pulled me over is that true? Or would me as the driver get in trouble?
He also said that it would be Ok for me drive the car, because the tax and car is his responsibility. Now if plod pulled me over is that true? Or would me as the driver get in trouble?
I asked this specific question about 3 years ago, and the response was that it was the responsibility of the driver to ensure that the vehicle they were driving was correctly taxed, MOTd, and insured (with exceptions for MOTs, etc).
Just like the onus is on passengers to ensure they wear a seatbelt - otherwise they individually get a fine - whereas it used to be the responsibility of the driver to ensure everyone wore a belt.
If those details are wrong - then I apologise, but that's how it was explained to me - and the rules I've stuck with.
K
Just like the onus is on passengers to ensure they wear a seatbelt - otherwise they individually get a fine - whereas it used to be the responsibility of the driver to ensure everyone wore a belt.
If those details are wrong - then I apologise, but that's how it was explained to me - and the rules I've stuck with.
K
Use/Cause/permit
Are the words added to the principle offences relating to the use of motor
vehicles
In the case of the circumstances listed above, both the potential purchaser and the prospective buyer would be using the vehicle.
The owner may also be subject of permitting the vehicle's use without tax if the 'use' clause was subject to a defence.
If I own a car and ask you to go to the shop to get a pint of milk for me and during that trip the vehicle is subject to construction and use offences, then both you and I are subject of using the vehicle subject to the specific offence. I don't need to be in the vehicle to be guilty of the offence!
Are the words added to the principle offences relating to the use of motor
vehicles
In the case of the circumstances listed above, both the potential purchaser and the prospective buyer would be using the vehicle.
The owner may also be subject of permitting the vehicle's use without tax if the 'use' clause was subject to a defence.
If I own a car and ask you to go to the shop to get a pint of milk for me and during that trip the vehicle is subject to construction and use offences, then both you and I are subject of using the vehicle subject to the specific offence. I don't need to be in the vehicle to be guilty of the offence!
yes the offences are causing and permitting, which covers everything apart form stealing or taking without consent
So if you let someone drive and the vehicle is commiting an offence eg the driver is not insured or car has no tax you are guilty as well of casuing the offence or permitting it and face the same penalties
Hence if someone wants to drive your car, then you need to SEE their insurance and to satisfy yourslef that it covers them for driving the vehicle. If its an invalid policy ie its been cancelled or isnt the driver you have a defence but the driver faces additional charges!
So if you let someone drive and the vehicle is commiting an offence eg the driver is not insured or car has no tax you are guilty as well of casuing the offence or permitting it and face the same penalties
Hence if someone wants to drive your car, then you need to SEE their insurance and to satisfy yourslef that it covers them for driving the vehicle. If its an invalid policy ie its been cancelled or isnt the driver you have a defence but the driver faces additional charges!
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff