Milgauss

Poll: Milgauss

Total Members Polled: 71

Black face with normal glass is nicer: 38%
Black face with green glass is nicer: 62%
Author
Discussion

RacingTeatray

Original Poster:

2,495 posts

217 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Am seriously keen on the Rolex Milgauss. Happened to be passing a watchstore in Burlington Arcade and it just caught my eye in the window. Instant lust - it's the simplicity of the design. But by 'eck, they're expensive. Apparently, the world and his wife wants one so the dealers are marking them up substantially (although that looks to be changing).

Initially, I was sure I wanted the black-face version with the green glass, but now I'm not sure that the black-face with normal glass isn't nicer (I like the design of the face-markings better) and, let's face it, it is £1000 (or more) cheaper, which is not to sniffed at.

What do people think? Is the green-glass one (which is apparently more sought-after) likely to retain value better?




Captain Chaos

393 posts

277 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
1. Dream watches and Watchesuk have a GV milgauss at a premium but less than Burlington arcade. Both are very reputable. Maybe Dominic H can assist perhaps too?

2. I have debated getting a milgauss (instead saving up for a Rolex Prince) and have to my relief watched the premiums for the green glass drop massively over the last 6 months. I don't know how easy it would be now to get one through an AD but frankly I'd give it a try.

If the standard black faced version floats your boat then there was one in the window of Mappin & Webb Fenchurch street the other week.

3. My preference is definitely for the Green version, I think it's funky and will always remain more desirable than the other standard versions.

Edited by Captain Chaos on Thursday 9th April 11:41

Seb d

613 posts

198 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Saw a green glass Milgauss on watches.co.uk for just over £5k - made me chuckle as when it was first released the most expensive one I saw was about £8k...

Chairman LMAO

666 posts

196 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Couple on TZ-UK recently for list. There is a white faced one for 3800 in Newcastle.

Dominic H

3,275 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Johnny,

You have mail.....

Dominic H

mickylee

66 posts

215 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
I picked a Milgauss GV up on Tuesday and love it! Compared to my Oyster Date it is MASSIVE

I waited about a week shy of 12 months for it from an AD, plus the price went from 3380 to 4100 but hey ho.


stiglet

1,082 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
I voted for the GV (just) but TBH I'd spend the £4k+ on a really good 5512/3 Classic Sub

Gurbinder

236 posts

202 months

Friday 10th April 2009
quotequote all
I bought a black dial last year after waiting for 10 mths, then saw a white & black dial in the window last week in York. I was also offered a green glass about 4 mths ago which i passed on as the market for all watches like these was a bit flat.

Edited by Gurbinder on Friday 10th April 11:44

Slagathore

5,814 posts

193 months

Friday 10th April 2009
quotequote all
I voted for the GV version, but I prefer the looks of the white faced one.




toohuge

3,434 posts

217 months

Friday 10th April 2009
quotequote all
It's a lovely watch, but i fear that the second hand may wear on me a little in a few years to come. I tried on one in america and it was very nice, just not sure about the second hand design.

ShadownINja

76,413 posts

283 months

Friday 10th April 2009
quotequote all
toohuge said:
It's a lovely watch, but i fear that the second hand may wear on me a little in a few years to come. I tried on one in america and it was very nice, just not sure about the second hand design.
Ditto. Do the Rolex designers object to using nice hands? I really dislike the Mercedes hands on SDs and Subs. Do Mercedes sponsor Rolex? nuts

RacingTeatray

Original Poster:

2,495 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
The second hand is precisely what I like - it sets off the pared-down simplicity of the rest of the design to perfection. Without it, the watch would verge on being bland.

clonmult

10,529 posts

210 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
I'm not a fan of any of the recent Milgauss models.

Will stick to my original late 50s Milgauss - slightly battered, lightning second hand, part of a link missing, doesn't jump out and say "I'm an expensive watch". It looks beautifully understated.

And rather bizarrely, my 9 month old son absolutely loves playing with it. I figure its lasted over 50 years, so it should be able to handle usage as a childs toy ..... although the more I think of it, the more I cringe ....

RacingTeatray

Original Poster:

2,495 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
Lucky man. I think it's fair to say that even the modern Milgaus watches are very understated by most standards.

Of Rolexes, only a boggo AirKing is perhaps subtler.

mel

10,168 posts

276 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
For what purpose was the Milgauss conceived? I know it's got magnetic shielding to protect the mechanism from interference but apart from spot welding (and I don't know any spot welders who'd wear a £5k watch to work) I don't know what profession it's aimed at?

Not that that takes away the beauty of the thing and after all how many dive watches ever get wet let alone go to 1200m

Dominic H

3,275 posts

233 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
mel said:
For what purpose was the Milgauss conceived? I know it's got magnetic shielding to protect the mechanism from interference but apart from spot welding (and I don't know any spot welders who'd wear a £5k watch to work) I don't know what profession it's aimed at?

Not that that takes away the beauty of the thing and after all how many dive watches ever get wet let alone go to 1200m
I lifted this from Wiki (obviously I knew it,whistlebut this is more eloquently put)it explains it well...

"The Rolex Oyster Perpetual Milgauss is a popular model introduced by Rolex in 1954 with the model number 6451. The Milgauss was designed as antimagnetic watch specifically for those who worked in power plants and research labs where electromagnetic fields can cause havoc with the timing of a watch. The Milgauss was equipped with antimagnetic alloys and encased by a Faraday cage. The words Milgauss is derived from the French word mille, which means one-thousand, and gauss, the unit of the magnetic field."

Rolex have a history for making watches you'd struggle to find a use for.
-More people have walked on the moon than dived recreationally deeper than 800ft, but that didn't stop Rolex coming up with the original model 1665 'SeaDweller 2000'.
-Who'd have thought there was a market for a Speliologist's watch, that didn't stop them introducing the 1655 Explorer II. It didn't sell*, but hey you don't win them all....

  • Sells very well now!


Edited by Dominic H on Tuesday 14th April 19:01

clonmult

10,529 posts

210 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
mel said:
For what purpose was the Milgauss conceived? I know it's got magnetic shielding to protect the mechanism from interference but apart from spot welding (and I don't know any spot welders who'd wear a £5k watch to work) I don't know what profession it's aimed at?

Not that that takes away the beauty of the thing and after all how many dive watches ever get wet let alone go to 1200m
The current model has to be more of a pure marketing excercise with the apparent upsurge in popularity of the original Milgauss? Or is it the other way round?