The "Elgin"marbles.

Author
Discussion

Getragdogleg

Original Poster:

8,772 posts

184 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Should we give them back ?

Wiki for those who don't know what I am on about :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elgin_Marbles

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Nah, they'll only sell them....

Riley15/6

105 posts

191 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Nah, they'll only sell them....
They did. To us.

cazzer

8,883 posts

249 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
No...its not like we nicked em.

Besides...they wouldnt exist if we hadnt looked after em.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Keep them... Have you seen the state of their buildings? They are all in ruins! They can't be trusted.

rolex

3,112 posts

259 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
Keep them... Have you seen the state of their buildings? They are all in ruins! They can't be trusted.
Must be the riots

Cock Womble 7

29,908 posts

231 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Ironically, I lost all my marbles to a Greek kid in the third year.

MentalSarcasm

6,083 posts

212 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Whenever someone asks me that (ancient history graduate, when people hear that I get asked about the marbles XD) I tend to think of what my Dad used to say when me and my brother refused to share our toys.

"If you two don't share, I'll chuck them in the bloody bin and you'll have nothing to play with".

I don't think that something that beautiful and that well-known should be chained to one particular museum in one particular city. They should be shared on a 10-year basis between museums around the world. 10 years in the British Museum, 10 years in Athens, 10 years in an American museum (or two, one west coast one east coast) and possibly 10 years in somewhere like Japan.

It's not just the marbles, it's something that should be done with all artefacts. Otherwise you're basically saying that the only people who can see these beautiful and fascinating things are those who can afford a flight to Britain. Or a flight to Egypt in the case of many Egyptian antiquities (some things, such as mummified remains, shouldn't be removed because they need to be climate controlled).

Yes I know that they could get damaged or broken in the process or moving them but they're already in lots of pieces. Sticking them back in Athens is going to add fk-all to the context of them because they can't be cemented back on to the Parthenon, and most of the context has been lost anyway when they A) lost their colour (they were originally painted) and B) blown to bits. If they get damaged while they're being moved then just glue them back together and move on, and be more careful next time.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
So if we bought them from the Greek originally, then surely it is only rightnif they give us the appropriate fee for them, inflation, and expenses taken into account. How much would that equate to I wonder?

Cock Womble 7

29,908 posts

231 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
So if we bought them from the Greek originally, then surely it is only rightnif they give us the appropriate fee for them, inflation, and expenses taken into account. How much would that equate to I wonder?
Probably more than they could afford right now.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Cock Womble 7 said:
Blue Meanie said:
So if we bought them from the Greek originally, then surely it is only rightnif they give us the appropriate fee for them, inflation, and expenses taken into account. How much would that equate to I wonder?
Probably more than they could afford right now.
wink

NDA

21,595 posts

226 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all

I've often pondered about not only the Elgin Marbles, but other museum treasures too... the bust of Nefertiti by Thutmose in Berlin, the Rosetta Stone in London and many others.

I think that if the objects were obtained legitimately then they should stay in their current location, but maybe I'm saying that because it's only Egypt and Greece that have such a vast quantity of ancient artefacts spread around the world. If it was British stuff, maybe I might feel differently.

Tough question to answer.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st May 2010
quotequote all
Personally, I think the notion of just having historical artifact only in their countries of origin sounds absurd. The fascination with museums and the contents therein is because of the stuff from all over the world, not despite it. If we start with the Elgin marbles, then where do we end up?

Neil H

15,323 posts

252 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
No way, we stole those fair and square.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
no. We saved them. They were being broken down and taken away by locals for building materials IIRC.

Much had already been lost damaged.

dudleybloke

19,846 posts

187 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
no.
they where bought not leased.

Beyond Rational

3,524 posts

216 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
you snooze, you lose

GTIR

24,741 posts

267 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
On that basis we should give The Royal family back to the Germans.

Summertime

1,292 posts

173 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all
We have a royal family confused

Four Cofffee

11,800 posts

236 months

Sunday 2nd May 2010
quotequote all

Why not share them? 5 or 10 years in each country?

I am sure they could fill our empty gallery with great artifacts for the period they were in Greece.