So, Roughly/exactly, cycling for one hour..

So, Roughly/exactly, cycling for one hour..

Author
Discussion

DarrenL

Original Poster:

459 posts

176 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
How many Calories do you burn?

I seem to find different answers to this question, can any one here give me their best guesstimate?

answers so far include:

- (from a Personal Trainer) around 200 calories an hour
- from my work colleague/and the computer on the exercise bike- 600-700 depending on intensity
- from my road bike's Cat Velo 8, 270-300.

Any advance on the above?

Thanks!

Daz


matty_doh

796 posts

179 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
I'd say around 500 an hour, on flat ground at around 16mph average, though the person in questions bodyweight is a pretty big factor.

Spydaman

1,505 posts

259 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
According to my Sportypal its about 50 calories per mile. So about 750 cals per hour at 15mph. Depends how heavy you are though.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
It might be between 200 and 750 cals per hour depending on weight, possibly.

DarrenL

Original Poster:

459 posts

176 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Depending on weight? I'm 99 kgs! What do you guys reckon then? I'd say around 600?

Flippin' Kipper

637 posts

180 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
More off road than on road?

Rolls

1,502 posts

178 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
according to my Garmin (when wearing my HR strap) my commute averages about 850 calories or so for a 40 (ish - can vary by a min or 2) ride
Thats 13 miles BTW.

Dunk76

4,350 posts

215 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
There's too many variables, surely?

On a schoolnight, I only do a five mile circuit round town - but on an MTB with the ever present galeforce winds and the fact 3.5 miles of that circuit is climbing (usually steeply), then I'd be burning more than a five mile jaunt on a roadie in the flat part of the county?

That's my excuse smile

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Depends on the efficiency of the bike and the efficiency of your body. I think Heart rate monitors estimate (or guess wink) the calories used based on your heart rate through the exercise and a guess at how efficient your body is.

The actual number of calories used will be different for people doing the same exercise.

P-Jay

10,579 posts

192 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
That is a real tough one. I'm 106kgs and to burn 1000 (based on heart monitor thing) would take about an hour and a half of cross-trainer / static bike in the Gym.

But the effort required in the GYM is far less than I use on my MTB to do say a lap of White's Level on my MTB.

Speaking to a guy in Morzine once, he had a funky heartbeat reading watch that showed how many cals he was burning, from when he left the chalet at 10am until he got back at 4pm he'd burnt over 5000 and he was super fit.

prand

5,916 posts

197 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
I'm not sure I trust those heart rate calorie burner thingies. I had my garmin bike unitin the car, after a trip up the motorway and back it was reading 20,000s of caliories burnt - and I wasn't attached to the monitor. So it clearly was just using speed as an indicator.

g_stacey

641 posts

234 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
This morning. 16.5 miles commute, 1 hour 2 mins, 1082 calories using heart rate monitor and Garmin. Sitting at work with big coffee and banana now!

Roman

2,031 posts

220 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
I'm around 99kg - averaging an output of around 300 watts over an hour (which for me would roughly equate to riding a roadbike on the road at an average speed of around 24-25mph) I will burn 900-950 calories.




Parsnip

3,122 posts

189 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Don't have any of my power files to hand (wrong computer) but anything between 400-1000 depending on what I am doing

HRMs don't "know" enough to tell you how many calories you have burned. If you include average speed and cadence into the calculation, it gets a bit more accurate, but it still doesn't consider stuff like gradient and wind speed and is also heavily reliant on how the device calculates it.

The majority of HRM based calorie counters I have encountered will over read by a fair bit - even a power meter (which will measure the amount of work you put into the bike) is out by 2-5% due to the nature of the human body. One thing a HRM will tell you is where the calories are coming from - if you know your zones, then you can work out roughly what percentage you are burning is fat, what is carbohydrate etc.


DrMekon

2,492 posts

217 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
According to sporttracks (awesome free software for analysing GPX files), this morning I did 28.71km in 56.58m, and burnt 980 calories. Sporttracks records the amount of climbing, my weight, and the weight of my bike, but not the prevailing wind. I know it uses weight in the calorie calc, but whether it uses the weight of the bike, I have no idea.

http://www.zonefivesoftware.com/SportTracks/

HTH.


Nick_F

10,154 posts

247 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
500 - 600.

It will take you all day to burn one pound of body fat.

dubbs

1,588 posts

285 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
I'll burn around 700Kcals/h but can get to nearly 1000Kcals/h that's putting in a fair amount of effort to do so and you'd not put that effort in for much longer than 1.5-2h.

3500kcals to burn for a pound of non-fluids weight loss.

I burned about 2400Kcals on the London to Brighton