60 tonne, 82' 10" road trains outside your local store

60 tonne, 82' 10" road trains outside your local store

Author
Discussion

streaky

Original Poster:

19,311 posts

250 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Oh, joy. The EU Motor Vehicle Working Group has set out to 'harmonise' maximum vehicle lengths on EU roads. Currently, this means up to 60 tonnes and 25.25m (82' 10") in length, comprising two trailers.

Two or three of these pulling up outside your local 'convenience' store throughout the day will undoubtedly inconvenience other motorists ... not to mention the people who want(ed) to stop and shop.

This was heralded in late 2009, but new leaked documents (not via Wikileaks) show progress being made to this end, with the likelihood that member countries will not be able to ban the lorries.

And this might not be the end, the Swedes would like 90-tonne, three trailer lorries.

Jack Semple, Road Haulage Association, has suggested that, "Longer and heavier vehicles are more sensible."

What country does he live in? Longer? Heavier? The man's deluded.

He went on to say that, "The safety-conscious Swedes have been using 60 tonners for five decades."

I can't wait to see what BRAKE (et al) make of that ... who knows, I might even find myself agreeing with them. yikes

Once this comes in - and it will - cue additional spending to upgrade bridges to cope with the extra weight and other road works to cope with the extra length. Kent Police's 'Operation Stack' will probably have to be re-worked to include the M25.

Streaky

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
whereas 2 or 3 40 tonne artics can happily park outside every corner shop with room to spare?

tvradict

3,829 posts

275 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
The last time this was brought up, the haulage industry only want them for Depot to Depot runs, using main routes. Not delivering to the local co-op.

Axle weights wont increase by much (if at all, depending on the design adopted) so bridges wont need to be upgraded.

This was the case when Denby and Robinson were applying to VOSA to run trials for these vehicles a few years ago. Denby even got himself arrested to try and bring the arguments for these vehicles infront of the courts IIRC.

Personally I think they are a good idea, but restrictions need to looked at very carefully.

Super Slo Mo

5,368 posts

199 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
OP, you should write for the daily mail, with that sensationalist claptrap as your opening gambit.

The fact is, a single truck pulling two trailers is both shorter and lighter than 2 individual artics pulling the same load. They wouldn't get used on multi-drop deliveries (ie to your local convenience store, it's difficult enough for a standard artic as it is), but for inter-depot trunks, much like the double deck trailers do (which don't do store deliveries either).

Motorway congestion would reduce (which is a good thing, surely), haulage costs would drop somewhat too. There's be no difference in braking performance or road damage since the weight per axle wouldn't change.

I really don't see why the small minded have a problem with this. Fewer trucks, less cost to us the consumer, less congestion. What's not to like?

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

260 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
What country does he live in? Longer? Heavier? The man's deluded.
When you think about it, there is a crazy logic there. If you were to string enough trailer units together, you'd eventually get to a point where the vehicle wouldn't actually have to move at all in order to make a delivery wink Think of all the emissions savings.

JJ

car crazy

1,796 posts

164 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Apparantly its a lot better for the enviroment because you only have one diesel engine pulling two trailers and because of the extra axles, you have reduced axle wieght meaning less damage to the roads.

Knock_knock

573 posts

177 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
[Crocodile Dundee] That's not a road train. This is a road train! [/Crocodile Dundee]



Apparently there are much bigger ones as well, but I couldn't find any pictures frown


KK



Alfa numeric

3,027 posts

180 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
Jack Semple, Road Haulage Association, has suggested that, "Longer and heavier vehicles are more sensible."
He's right you know.

They're called trains.

car crazy

1,796 posts

164 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Knock_knock][Crocodile Dundee] That's not a road train. This is a road train! [/Crocodile Dundee said:


Apparently there are much bigger ones as well, but I couldn't find any pictures frown


KK
My boss wanted to run these from his midlands depot to his glasgow depot (all motorway) as night trunkers but presscott said no or put it on the back burner for the next government

Alfa numeric

3,027 posts

180 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
car crazy said:


Apparently there are much bigger ones as well, but I couldn't find any pictures frown


KK
Those things are scary to overtake on a typical Australian road. They're so long (especially on the Stuart Highway between Alice Springs & Darwin) that they can take ages to pass when you're only allowed to do 30km/h more than them.

ETA I've just lookd them up and they can be up to 110m in length. Imagine how long it would take to overtake one of these travelling at 60mph when you're only allowed to do 80...



Edited by Alfa numeric on Tuesday 1st February 11:28

F i F

44,214 posts

252 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
The Swedish version comprises a three axle rigid witha drawbar onto a twin axle dolly equipped with a 5th wheel coupling, and onto that is hooked a standard semi trailer.

It's no big deal frankly, however, there is a lot more space in the country and iirc they don't comply with EU turning circle regs.

No idea what the 90 tonne version comprises.

As to situation in UK, let's face it even now Tesco create a problem with sending std artics to deliver to their smaller shops, and have been told about it numerous times. Sainsbury's have quite a decent fllet of small rigids and try to address this issue.

As others have said it's for main trunking and especially for loads constrained by space rather than weight. This is often the case with supermarkets.


Muzzer

3,814 posts

222 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
As if these will be outside your local Tesco Express rolleyes

These vehicles will be used for depot-to-depot trunking.

It's simple logic - bigger vehicle means you can get more in it, meaning you need to use less vehicles.

Good for the haulier who pays less in wages, fuel, leasing and maintenance

Good for the driver who has less trucks clogging up roads

Good for the consumer who pays less for their goods which have cost less to get there (or at least would have if fuel wasn't rising)

You wouldn't need to upgrade any roads or bridges, just limit which roads these trucks can drive on

F i F

44,214 posts

252 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Restricted routes, OK but what happens when an approved motorway or trunk road closes and the diversion does not accommodate these vehicles?

And the driver is foreign...

And it's not just down to axle loads as the total load of several vehicles in tandem?

Aren't we still doing bridges from the last weight increase? Probably some still to do from the one before that if truth be known.

Easy to say, not so easy or cheap to do.

BigBob

1,471 posts

226 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Alfa numeric said:
ETA I've just lookd them up and they can be up to 110m in length. Imagine how long it would take to overtake one of these travelling at 60mph when you're only allowed to do 80...
That's about the same length as the pitch in the Millenium Stadium yikes


BB

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Alfa numeric said:
Imagine how long it would take to overtake one of these travelling at 60mph when you're only allowed to do 80...
100yds long, say 200 to give you room to pull out and pull in

200yds at 20mph (relative), 20.5 seconds

tenohfive

6,276 posts

183 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Alfa numeric said:
Imagine how long it would take to overtake one of these travelling at 60mph when you're only allowed to do 80...
About 15 seconds. But 60mph is a fair speed, that's the speed I commute at on the motorways.

If these vehicles are talked about being used for trunk routes depot to depot then it's a bit of a non story isn't it?

car crazy

1,796 posts

164 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
BigBob said:
That's about the same length as the pitch in the Millenium Stadium yikes


BB
You would probably still get cars trying to pass you down the blindside as wellbiggrin

speedchick

5,181 posts

223 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
I am assuming they come with bigger units then? I know that my other half has a pulling restriction on his unit, something like about 20 tonnes, cos he had to sit and wait for them to bring him a new unit one day so he could do the job he had been sent out for. Not all of them on the road at the moment are certified or whatever upto 40t.

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

260 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
speedchick said:
I know that my other half has a pulling restriction on his unit,
Very sensible wink

JJ

speedchick

5,181 posts

223 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
jazzyjeff said:
speedchick said:
I know that my other half has a pulling restriction on his unit,
Very sensible wink

JJ
Well you have to keep these truckies in line!

I just couldn't for the life of me think of the correct terms needed, as most of what I know about trucking was restricted to the theory test questions, not really something I have a lot of interest in, just that I know his only goes to around 20 tonnes or something like that.

I'll shut up now shall I wink