AF447 wreckage located...

Author
Discussion

thatone1967

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all

Chuck328

1,581 posts

168 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
That's a surprise.

I wonder how this will pan out after Air Frances seemingly belligerent attitude toward recovery.

I do hope the BB's intact, unlikely but it would be nice to know....


Kudos

2,672 posts

175 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
Chuck328 said:
I wonder how this will pan out after Air Frances seemingly belligerent attitude toward recovery.
I thought it was them (and Airbus) who are paying for the search?

thatone1967

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
Kudos said:
Chuck328 said:
I wonder how this will pan out after Air Frances seemingly belligerent attitude toward recovery.
I thought it was them (and Airbus) who are paying for the search?
From the text of the article:

"The search has been financed jointly by Air France and Airbus. It involves dives to depths of up to 4,000m (13,120ft) with the use of special robots to examine the ocean floor between Brazil and West Africa."


Chuck328

1,581 posts

168 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all

Hmm, not the best choice of words on my part (two bottles of champers and a nice red didn't help lol) however, I was referring to some comments made by a pal who works in the shipping industry. Upon looking into organising search and recovery options the feeling was AF just didn't want any outside interference. All seems quite complicated!


thatone1967

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
Confirmation that wreckage and bodies located.

http://bit.ly/eUIY4D

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
'a French judge filed preliminary manslaughter charges against Air France and the plane's manufacturer, Airbus.... Air France and Airbus are financing the estimated £7.7m cost of the new search - about £17m has already been spent on the three previous searches for the jet's wreckage.'

I can't help thinking that sometimes it would be best to file it under 'accident' and save the manslaughter charges and £24.7M. All that money comes from taxpayers and trvaellers.

fergywales

1,624 posts

195 months

Monday 4th April 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
'a French judge filed preliminary manslaughter charges against Air France and the plane's manufacturer, Airbus.... Air France and Airbus are financing the estimated £7.7m cost of the new search - about £17m has already been spent on the three previous searches for the jet's wreckage.'

I can't help thinking that sometimes it would be best to file it under 'accident' and save the manslaughter charges and £24.7M. All that money comes from taxpayers and trvaellers.
From someone that flies longhaul a few times a year, I would rather they spent 10 times that so that I am not the next one left at the bottom of Davy Jones' Locker!

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
'a French judge filed preliminary manslaughter charges against Air France and the plane's manufacturer, Airbus.... Air France and Airbus are financing the estimated £7.7m cost of the new search - about £17m has already been spent on the three previous searches for the jet's wreckage.'

I can't help thinking that sometimes it would be best to file it under 'accident' and save the manslaughter charges and £24.7M. All that money comes from taxpayers and trvaellers.
It's the French system, different from ours.

Oily Nails

2,932 posts

201 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13255673


Looks like they have got one of the recorders....hopefully it will finally shed some light on the events up there frown

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
It's the French system, different from ours.
Ah. Well the French seem to have lots of money; everything they have works well, everything is subsidised and they're buying up most of our business too. Oddly they set up the EU...

lost in espace

6,179 posts

208 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Second box recovered!!!!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/03/air-fr...

Back of the net.

horza

491 posts

208 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Good news at last. Hopefully this will shed some light on the accident.

A guy up the road from me died in the crash. It's had a shocking impact on his family.

Very sad...

horza

491 posts

208 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Interim update from Reuters. More to come from AF on Friday apparently:

(Reuters) - Preliminary findings from the recorders of an Air France jet that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009 have found that the pilots became distracted with malfunctioning airspeed indicators and failed to properly manage other critical systems, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

The crew did not follow standard procedures to maintain air speed and keep the aircraft's nose level after the Airbus 330 encountered some turbulence and unexpectedly high icing at 35,000 feet, the paper said.

Air France and Airbus were unavailable for comment outside business hours.

The Journal said the cockpit recorders show that the pilots apparently became confused by the alarms blaring from their instruments and despite trying to systematically respond to each warning, were unable to sort out the chaos and maintain a steady course.

The findings from the recorders, which are to be released on Friday, are expected to show that the twin-engine jet slowed dangerously after the autopilot disengaged.

The crash killed all 228 people on board Flight 447, which was on a scheduled flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.

(Reporting by Abhiram Nandakumar in Bangalore; Editing by Anshuman Daga)

lost in espace

6,179 posts

208 months

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Friday 27th May 2011
quotequote all
How can you fail to recover from a stall at 35,000 feet? Too much instrumentation and alarms? Where was the horizon?

Chuck328

1,581 posts

168 months

Friday 27th May 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How can you fail to recover from a stall at 35,000 feet? Too much instrumentation and alarms? Where was the horizon?
With full nose up trim in turbulence, night time, circadian rhythm, information overload....

Quite easily by the looks of things. There by the grace of fate go I....

I just put up a post in the News section might help. smile

Roadrunner23

541 posts

196 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How can you fail to recover from a stall at 35,000 feet? Too much instrumentation and alarms? Where was the horizon?
They wouldnt be able to visually see the horizon as it was night.

lost in espace

6,179 posts

208 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How can you fail to recover from a stall at 35,000 feet? Too much instrumentation and alarms? Where was the horizon?
It fell at 10k feet a minute as well.

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Saturday 28th May 2011
quotequote all
lost in espace said:
Simpo Two said:
How can you fail to recover from a stall at 35,000 feet? Too much instrumentation and alarms? Where was the horizon?
It fell at 10k feet a minute as well.
Nose up. I presume when they say nose up they don't mean perfectly tail first...do they?