Swift Justice

Author
Discussion

Sk00p

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd February 2018
quotequote all
No messing about yikes



Edited by Sk00p on Friday 23 February 09:25

Sk00p

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd February 2018
quotequote all
Their last tweet about it probably covers it



Basically allows them to circumvent all the legislation around driving an HGV

Sk00p

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd February 2018
quotequote all
No idea, just been following it on Twitter the last couple of days. Surprised at how quick it was dealt with.

Sk00p

Original Poster:

3,961 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd February 2018
quotequote all
sas62 said:
Err thats the complete opposite of what I'm saying.

Dangerous driving is a crime with its own charging recommendations.

What you can't do is increase the punishment because they might have killed someone.

The possible outcomes of dangerous driving are pretty much the same as the original post yet you don't often see a ten year ban and prison time.
I suspect the sentence isn't because of what could have happened, it's that the laws he has broken give the judge the power is issue such a sentence. 3 separate fraud convictions as mentioned by HantsRat.

The last tweet was more opinion of the person on the twitter account than anything to do with law.