£1 damages award in WAG-gate - plausible?
Discussion
My dad suggested to me today that the judge could maybe find for Vardy but award £1 in damages with both parties paying costs. Does this seem a plausible solution? At first I thought it was silly but the following seem kinda clear:
1. Vardy agent at a minimum was leaking stuff
2. Rooney not averse to publicity seeking herself
3. Entire thing is a massive waste of money and court time
And the following is likely:
1. Technically not possible to prove Vardy was personally leaking anything
2. Judge would want to send out message about wasting court time
Does this seem plausible to legal eagles?
1. Vardy agent at a minimum was leaking stuff
2. Rooney not averse to publicity seeking herself
3. Entire thing is a massive waste of money and court time
And the following is likely:
1. Technically not possible to prove Vardy was personally leaking anything
2. Judge would want to send out message about wasting court time
Does this seem plausible to legal eagles?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff