Fiddling, should I, and what direction?

Fiddling, should I, and what direction?

Author
Discussion

upsidedownmark

Original Poster:

2,120 posts

136 months

Wednesday 20th December 2017
quotequote all
Car is an ex-academy 1.6 (EU3). Believe it to be bone stock, as it was still sealed until I snipped the seal to inspect the cambelt. It does however have a kmaps ecu.

I've been thinking about fiddling because a) fiddling is fun, and b) I found it rather disappointingly linear/torquey(!).
Pulls well from 1500, really well from about 3k doesn't really seem to come 'on cam' especially. The only reason to take it out to the 7200 limit is to avoid using 5th.. (however I like and want to keep the 5 speed box because it tours too).


So, what would I want to achieve?

It would be nice if I had to be a bit more subtle with the throttle. Had the time of my life at a wet bedford, really having to work for my kicks/to hook up corner exits.. whereas at silverstone, as much as I enjoyed chucking it into the fast corners, it was a bit of a case of wait, then nail the throttle hard. I would stick with 13x6 all round, as I'd prefer it to be under-tyred, and I'm not really chasing laptime, more 'fun'.
Not sure how much I should be aiming for.. Maybe my driving needs to evolve..

My initial thoughts, were as I need to change the cambelt I may as well put some hotter cams in.. (man maths!). Question is, supersport cams, or?
Also thought that I can have a look at the plastic plenum - believe from the K engine page that there are some gains to be had there.
The stock short 4:1 exhaust doesn't look good.. but perhaps oddly I would prefer it was quieter than more noisy, which also puts me off throttle bodies, and maybe they're not much good without headwork..
I don't have the appetite or skills for porting the head or messing with valves (and no power in the garage).
I guess a lot of the above requires a ecu change, although I'd be quite tempted to get kmaps to re-map the existing.

The other thought that occurs is that getting hold of a 160 engine out of an MGF and swapping all or some of that over might be a valid avenue.. or is that more complicated than I think / heresy that will devalue the car?

Perhaps I'd be better to just sell the car as is and buy one that's already tickled.. but then I know mine and I'm kinda attached to it (it's also the only one I've ever driven).

upsidedownmark

Original Poster:

2,120 posts

136 months

Thursday 21st December 2017
quotequote all
Ah, yes.. I thought I said, but it is indeed a rover k 1.6 in 120bhp form, plus whatever the kmaps ecu gives me.

It took me about 2 weeks to decide to fit an LSD - done smile

.. and I have indeed read Dave's page forwards backwards and sideways - very aware of what is available. Question is more subjective, upgrade this one (and how far should I go to make a 'worthwhile' change), vs swap the car, which would cost a bit..

The side idea which was noticing a 50k mile MGF with rust and a 160bhp k for sale at 500 quid. Rob the engine, scrap the car.. seemed a cheap way to a chunk more oomph, but can't help feeling I'm missing something.

I guess my inclination at the moment is cams/exhaust, if only because it's minimal disruption, and I could do the fitting myself, but equally I guess it's likely to yield a small increment.

upsidedownmark

Original Poster:

2,120 posts

136 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Really? I'm guessing the 120 - I believe that's approximately what an entirely vanilla 1.6k delivers.. it's a 2006 1.6 academy car, turned roadcar. I believe the ECU went to kmaps to get the immobiliser deleted, and got a map put on it at the same time.
I've been told various things about the kmaps map, wasn't expecting any extra power really; the main thing I expect is less holes in the midrange.

As for cracked pistons, I'd hope not.. I know there's a limit beyond which they eventually don't do so well (7200 iirc), but they live plenty well in other cars.

Edited by upsidedownmark on Friday 22 December 16:56