Discussion
I am flying the FC3 modules, which is good as the learning curve is a bit easier. Mainly before I invest too heavily in a high fidelity version.
I am due to get a quest 2 but want to make sure this is going to stick but been a long time flight sim fan.
Currently mostly flying the Migs - but the 29 was so hard to land sticking with the 27.
I can land ok with it, managed a few missions ok!
I guess its just the sheer amount of info to take in, a decent HOTAS is on list to as using a fairly cheap thrustmaster job.
I am due to get a quest 2 but want to make sure this is going to stick but been a long time flight sim fan.
Currently mostly flying the Migs - but the 29 was so hard to land sticking with the 27.
I can land ok with it, managed a few missions ok!
I guess its just the sheer amount of info to take in, a decent HOTAS is on list to as using a fairly cheap thrustmaster job.
Steve93 said:
Id actually say the Hornet to be honest.
Lot to learn etc but it's relatively easy to fly, I guess it's a bit like driving a car with ESP ABS and all that makes it very forgiving to fly. Can't hurt to ask anyone with experience to fly with you and point you in the right direction
Been told the Tomcat is the opposite, a bit like driving an old 80s RWD turbo car in the wet on toyo R888's though
Yeah think need a bit of 1-1 tbh. Having said that I did manage a carrier landing on the FC3 training mission tonight after many attempts!Lot to learn etc but it's relatively easy to fly, I guess it's a bit like driving a car with ESP ABS and all that makes it very forgiving to fly. Can't hurt to ask anyone with experience to fly with you and point you in the right direction
Been told the Tomcat is the opposite, a bit like driving an old 80s RWD turbo car in the wet on toyo R888's though
Gassing Station | Video Games | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff