General Purpose/Walkabout lens - Nikon FX
Discussion
I'm thinking about upgrading my old D5100 to a full-frame body (D610 probably). One thing I'm slightly struggling with is finding a good general purpose lens. So far the best fit (on paper) I've found is either the Nikon 24-85mm or the Sigma Art 24-105mm f/4. Can anyone give any input on either of these, or suggest a better alternative?
My current general purpose lens is the Nikon 18-140mm DX, I realise I probably won't get anything that flexible in FX format but I wonder if there's something close.
My current general purpose lens is the Nikon 18-140mm DX, I realise I probably won't get anything that flexible in FX format but I wonder if there's something close.
Thanks all for the input, some useful insight there.
Anyone got/familiar with the Nikon 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D? Apart from the different aperture, what are the other differences between that and the later 3.5-4.5 G version?
Another question - what would the advice be around upgrading from DX to FX - get a new body first, get new lens(es) first or wait until funds allow both?
Anyone got/familiar with the Nikon 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D? Apart from the different aperture, what are the other differences between that and the later 3.5-4.5 G version?
Another question - what would the advice be around upgrading from DX to FX - get a new body first, get new lens(es) first or wait until funds allow both?
So the rationale for upgrading to an FX camera was based on a few things. My D5100 suffers a bit in low light due to ISO grain and I like shooting in low light. I also like doing stuff using the Brenizer method and that's hard on a crop sensor because you have to take way more shots than with a full-frame or risk gaps in the stitch later on. I've also got a load of images I like but wish had a shallower DoF - I know this can be faked in post but I prefer to minimise post processing.
The context for the original post was in part about what to do with the existing camera if I do upgrade. The D5100 + 18-140mm is a good combination for every day stuff, family days out, shots of the kids etc. It may make some sense to keep that, particularly if there's no decent option for a general-purpose lens for FX, and just use the full-frame system for stuff it's better at.
The context for the original post was in part about what to do with the existing camera if I do upgrade. The D5100 + 18-140mm is a good combination for every day stuff, family days out, shots of the kids etc. It may make some sense to keep that, particularly if there's no decent option for a general-purpose lens for FX, and just use the full-frame system for stuff it's better at.
RobDickinson said:
8bit said:
I also like doing stuff using the Brenizer method and that's hard on a crop sensor because you have to take way more shots than with a full-frame or risk gaps in the stitch later on.
Absolutely not a dx-fx issue. Shouldnt matter at all, the problem is overlap and focal length.RobDickinson said:
8bit said:
I've also got a load of images I like but wish had a shallower DoF - I know this can be faked in post but I prefer to minimise post processing.
Your using a slow superzoom, £100 on a nifty fifty will get you very shallow dof, or an 85/1.8RobDickinson said:
8bit said:
My D5100 suffers a bit in low light due to ISO grain and I like shooting in low light.
That can happen and be improved with a FX sensor but a lot is down to technique (exposure/ettr) and getting a faster lens and/or flasheltawater said:
More importantly, what sort of photography so you do?
I have a tamron 17-50 2.8 as my walkabout with the sigma 70-200 2.8 for airshow and bird photography on my d7000. Can't say I've ever wanted for shallower DOF in those ranges.
Excuse the Facebook munged photos....
Lovely shots I have a tamron 17-50 2.8 as my walkabout with the sigma 70-200 2.8 for airshow and bird photography on my d7000. Can't say I've ever wanted for shallower DOF in those ranges.
Excuse the Facebook munged photos....
I did explain some of the sorts of things I want full-frame for on the previous page.
@Simpo Two - thanks for that, useful insight.
Just to round out this thread, on the basis of cost to replace the lenses I have now I decided to stick with DX for the time being. Thanks all for the input.
I did treat myself to this - still DX but I got a cracking deal on it so I figured I'd be able to sell for what I paid if/when the time comes and so far I love using it...
(shot with Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G)
I did treat myself to this - still DX but I got a cracking deal on it so I figured I'd be able to sell for what I paid if/when the time comes and so far I love using it...
(shot with Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G)
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff