Hydroconquest vs Seamaster

[funinhounslow]

I have been happily saving for a Seamaster 300 - specifically the white dial



and I am reconsidering my choice after seeing this

Longines Hydroconquest full ceramic



I have had a steel Hydroconquest for almost 10 years and it is a fantastic watch. I have enough saved for the ceramic version or I can save a bit longer for the Seamaster.

I don’t particularly like the lugs on the Hydroconquest but in balance I’m not a fan of the Seamaster helium escape valve.

The Omega has the superior movement but the Longines has that full ceramic case.

I suppose it could be argued that Omega is the “better” brand but there is also a significant price difference between the two.

I personally think Longines is underrated as a brand. My original Hydroconquest is remarkable value for money. I consider the price of the ceramic to be “fair” while I think Omega are pushing the envelope a little with their Seamaster prices. (Yes I know there’s some wriggle room here.)

I was just wondering if anyone had any thoughts on these watches. In short - what would you do? This will be a significant purchase for me and any thoughts are welcome...

[funinhounslow]

Jayho said:

If you've got a similar longines already would you really need another so similar?

Yeah there is that. But I like that ceramic case and I don’t have a ceramic watch.

I either end up with two Hydroconquests or two steel dive watches (three if you include my Orange Monster). Neither is particularly sensible I suppose...!

[funinhounslow]

blue_haddock said:

Greendubber said:

I cant get on with those crown guards on the ceramics hydroconquest.

I do find the hydroconquest crown guards a bit too blocky and it spoils the look.

Yeah me too. I’m not sure if it’s a result of constraints of ceramic material like the long lugs. Having seen the watch in the flesh I could certainly live with it though.

Food for thought in the replies, thank you. While I accept the Seamaster is probably the “better” watch I am not sure it is worth the extra over the HydroConquest (factoring in likely discounts on both pieces).

I have decided not to rush into it, continue saving for the Omega and then decide. I can see myself testing the patience of the staff in the jewellers when I come to buy though...

To be honest though I am leaning towards the Longines. I think Omega’s pricing is becoming increasingly “optimistic”, perhaps taking advantage of the “unobtanium” nature of Rolex sports models. And the post below has convinced me I need a ceramic watch. Thanks all...

Ninjin said:

Now, going back to your Ceramic Longines, for that price range, consider the Tudor Black shield. My local AD had 20% off if over xmas too on the pre price rise cost. I've had mine since it's been released and its hard as nails! I caught it againts my acrylic kitchen worktop and thought it would get damaged, ended up damaging the work top!