Kellogs Ricicles/sugar police

Author
Discussion

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Not always the easiest to find cereal, but upon browsing a number of supermarkets in recent weeks and found none, today googled it and discovered they have been discontinued due to the sugar content!!

im devastated.

frosties being reformulated too which is bad, but ricicles just cut. i doubt they sold many but my fave and a taste of childhood.

the sugar tax/police whatever it is really p's me off.
if i want to put ste down my throat i should be allowed to, as long as i accept the consequences. I understand if i eat crap i then need to do extra exercise or modify my future diet accordingly.

the government should'nt force/encourage companies to produce lower sugar products. there should be choice. if a load of fatties with no self control can't limit there intake of unhealthy stuff they should be denied NHS treatment for weight related issues. the rest of us shouldnt suffer. likewise if their too stupid not to feed their kids a load of crap to make them fat too the rest of us shouldnt be punished by limiting our choice of products.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
The problem with accepting the consequences is that whilst you might be willing to suffer whatever illness you get, someone else foots the bill.

That said, I do agree that I should be able to eat and drink what I want because I eat and drink crap in moderation.
no i said fatties shouldn't get nhs treatment. so no one foots the bill. they should just be left to get on with it and h

i have private med so my attitude is a bit i'm alright jack, but still i don't think the nhs should be free for lifestyle related illnesses (smoking/being a greedy pig) i draw the line at those.

arguments could be made about other lifestyle choices, ie sports injuries, driving too fast etc that could cause hospital visits potentially, but for those you are unlucky to get ill effects from them

...smoking and being obese are known, proven detriments to health, so for those you are lucky if you dont suffer from any illnesses as a result.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Podie said:
Do Sugar Puffs still exist then?

Is the Honey Monster on the dole?
yes and their rank now. horrible reformulation.

i saw a program about cereal once, they did a taste test of the 20 years ago (or similar) cornflakes formula to today's and the old one was apparently incredibly and unbearably salty. maybe the same will be true in 10 years of the reduced sugar cereals, but too me at least changing the sweetness of something that has always been and is meant to be sweet is going to be different to saltiness.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Truckosaurus said:
Make your own using the secret Ricicles recipe below: (in full)



and

ah, yes but sugar on rice krispies is nothing like the precoated frosted nuggest of goodness that a ricicle is! just doesnt taste the same. plus you cant eat them raw (no milk) with sugar on just doesnt work.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
[redacted]

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Saleen836 said:
theplayingmantis said:
Not always the easiest to find cereal, but upon browsing a number of supermarkets in recent weeks and found none, today googled it and discovered they have been discontinued due to the sugar content!!

im devastated.

frosties being reformulated too which is bad, but ricicles just cut. i doubt they sold many but my fave and a taste of childhood.

the sugar tax/police whatever it is really p's me off.
if i want to put ste down my throat i should be allowed to, as long as i accept the consequences. I understand if i eat crap i then need to do extra exercise or modify my future diet accordingly.

the government should'nt force/encourage companies to produce lower sugar products. there should be choice. if a load of fatties with no self control can't limit there intake of unhealthy stuff they should be denied NHS treatment for weight related issues. the rest of us shouldnt suffer. likewise if their too stupid not to feed their kids a load of crap to make them fat too the rest of us shouldnt be punished by limiting our choice of products.
I have just checked my cereal store and have both Frosties and Cheerios so looked at nutrition on both per 30g serving...

Frosties Cheerios
Energy 113kcal 174kcal
Fat 0.2g 3.3g
of which saturates 0.03g 1.4g
Carbs 26g 28g
of which sugars 11g 11g
Fibre 0.6g 2.7g
Protein 1.4g 7.1
Salt 0.25g 0.40g

To me it looks like Frosties are healthier so why mess?
thats the thing on ricicles im certain you compare them to rice krispies (there non frosted country cousin), somehow there's only a few kcal different in a bowl. same with frosties vs corn flakes. so the whole anti sugar thing in cutting these is just for show.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

3,779 posts

82 months

Monday 19th February 2018
quotequote all
Fastchas said:
I’ve just had to go to Walsall. I’ll be glad when sugary foods are outlawed, you should have seen some of the fat, gormless looking fkers around there.
Humans can’t be trusted to eat sensibly any more. The recipes of the food manufacturers make sure that they can’t be resisted.
i can resist.

its called evolution which has sadly stopped witht eh advent of modern medicine and people not being held to account for the poor choices they make, and explains why there are so many feckless individuals around.

let all the fat greedy porkers die.