Homebuyers survey - Indemnity insurance claim.?

Homebuyers survey - Indemnity insurance claim.?

Author
Discussion

jamesc_1729

Original Poster:

468 posts

190 months

Friday 9th September 2016
quotequote all
Hi

Earlier this year I went through the process of buying a house - I had a RICS chartered firm perform a homebuyers survey.

In the garden of the house was a tree, trunk width 7-8", which was planted within a foot of a brick garden wall (after the wall was constructed, 13 years ago) Subsequent Googling reveals soil type around here to be clay-ish.

I completed beginning of June. We have had a dry hot summer this year. Within 10 weeks, the wall has obviously suffered subsidence due to the tree and dropped, cracking bricks and mortar.

The wording in the report was "there are young trees in the front and back gardens, these are within potential influexncing distance - future risk will need to be mitigated by pruning or thinning".

On the one hand I can see that the surveyor has covered his backside with the wording. On the other hand, given he is a local expert on soil conditions etc, he could have written something along the lines of:

Action - the soil type here is clay, the tree is mature and needs pruning ASAP.

In which case I would have instructed a tree surgeon... I am not an expert and was not suggested to get a second opinion. I didn't expect my nice garden wall to need rebuilding within ten weeks of moving in. Do I have any recourse or do I take this on the chin as an example of 'life experience is a great teacher, she gives the test first and the lesson after...?'

:-)

jamesc_1729

Original Poster:

468 posts

190 months

Friday 9th September 2016
quotequote all
Not within the first 8 weeks of moving in, no.

I believe that is central to my question - were it highlighted as a matter of urgency then it would have been foremost in my mind to have done so.


jamesc_1729

Original Poster:

468 posts

190 months

Friday 9th September 2016
quotequote all
So, understand anecdotally that the modern survey is full of backside covering legalese.... However in this scenario it doesn't say 'you should immediately seek the opinion of a qualified tree surgeon', nor does it say 'I am of the opinion there is an immediate danger'.

Which is the only, albeit slim, chance I am hoping that having paid for this professional advice, I am open to some kind of redress.

If not then fine, but worth asking the question on here..?

jamesc_1729

Original Poster:

468 posts

190 months

Saturday 10th September 2016
quotequote all
Issi said:
The surveyor pointed out that there were trees in the garden that could pose a risk, and that you should look into having them pruned.

You didn't take any notice of this, and now want to sue because what he warned you about actually happened.

Did I get this right?
No, you didn't get it right. I don't want to sue, and I'm not saying he has done anything negligent. Yes it was mentioned, but not with the clear implication that damage would occur within weeks of buying the house. Therefore I am simply asking people for advice, as to whether this should have been worded more strongly and whether this kind of situation falls into the realms of a PI claim.

As I said in the opening post, quite happy to chalk this one upto experience.




Edited by jamesc_1729 on Saturday 10th September 20:36