Flue detached from flue liner / changes in building regs?

Flue detached from flue liner / changes in building regs?

Author
Discussion

8-P

Original Poster:

2,758 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th September 2017
quotequote all
Hi All

Long story short - chimney sweep has managed to detach my flue from my flue liner with his brush. Told us it was only held together with flue cement and not his fault?! Hmm

So chap came today, said it needed a new longer flue liner - £800 or so to do the job! Reckoned building regs had changed since our was installed in 2012 by the previous owners.

This seems odd, as before this happened it was working fine for the last 2 years since weve used it, so I fail to see why it cant be just joined back up?

Any views appreciated! Im getting the original installer out either way.

Many thanks


8-P

Original Poster:

2,758 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th September 2017
quotequote all
Having looked tonight I can see what has happened and quite frankly a new liner seems mad. If I got a handful of fire cement and spread it round it would be back to how it has been for the last 5 years. If it needs a new one it was wrong from the start. £800 to replace I’ve been quoted again by a different guy.

8-P

Original Poster:

2,758 posts

261 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
I should have said - this is for my log burner not my boiler sorry!

8-P

Original Poster:

2,758 posts

261 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
Just as an update, the original installer turned up yesterday to check it out. Looked at my Hetas cert(they signed it off) and then took a look.

He had a camera on rods with him so used these to take a proper look. Turned out my flue was only partly lined (probably only a few metres worth from what I could see).

He was rather confused as to why this had been done and without dumping his own company in it too much told me it wasnt right and they would be back to fully line the chimney - which is what should have been done in the first place. He couldnt explain why it had been done this way. I have no idea, some sort of slack short cut, actually it could have been potentially dangerous from what I read/he hinted at.

Needless to say, no talk of any cost to me, I wont be paying them a cent even if they try it on, which I dont think they will as I think they want to brush it under the carpet.