Liberty criticised by venue group
Discussion
A feature article in Motosport News this week on an open letter, or press release rather, criticises Liberty for their funding model. The 'ouch' line being that if the traditional venues are not supported then F1 will be limited to inferior circuits. There are a number of other specific criticisms, one of not being the lack of free to air TV being likely to hit gates, and as ticket sales are the only way for some (more on some later) venues to make money, it makes holding an F1 race unfeasible.
Liberty holds 'experience events' (I think that's the phrase) on the same day as the race but at remote venues, taking spectators away.
Some venues have a different funding arrangement, meaning a lack of risk to those putting the race on.
The group does not include China, Russia, some other countries also with no real F1 history, and, surprisingly to me, Japan. Further, Miami get there race free yet there's another race in the USA that has to pay.
The bit becoming biters?
Liberty holds 'experience events' (I think that's the phrase) on the same day as the race but at remote venues, taking spectators away.
Some venues have a different funding arrangement, meaning a lack of risk to those putting the race on.
The group does not include China, Russia, some other countries also with no real F1 history, and, surprisingly to me, Japan. Further, Miami get there race free yet there's another race in the USA that has to pay.
The bit becoming biters?
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff