RE: Westfield Sport 250: Driven

RE: Westfield Sport 250: Driven

Thursday 9th November 2017

2019 Westfield Sport 250 | UK Review

The Focus ST's 2.0-litre Ecoboost makes for a very fast - if somewhat uneven - Caterham rival



You have to hand it to Westfield. Of all the companies that sprouted like mushrooms in Caterham's shade, the Midlands-based firm is easily the second most well-known builder of Seven-style kit cars - and yet it only sells around 150 examples a year. More recently (and very cannily) the manufacturer has made a profitable niche for itself in the autonomous, battery-powered pod market; a niche which has the potential to swell considerably.

The maker of the Megabusa, the SEiGHT and the XTR2 has already shifted £30m worth of goofy-looking self-drive shuttles to the South Korean government - which is less surprising when you learn that they go for £150K a pop. At that price, Westfield would be forgiven for knocking the whole car building thing on the head, and concentrating fully on the growth industry which is clearly paying most of the bills.

But of course it's not. Far from it. In fact the company is reinvesting in its sports car brand, and next year is intending on introducing an all-new mid-engined model that will be have a spaceframe chassis, and be available as both a coupe and a roadster. It will apparently be powered by a 255hp 2.0-litre Ford Ecoboost engine - a powerplant that it will share with the subject of today's Driven: the Sport 250.

Like a Seven to look at, just sort of not a Seven
Like a Seven to look at, just sort of not a Seven

The turbocharged four-cylinder is a minor departure for Westfield, which has typically favoured Vauxhall or even secondhand Honda units for its more spirited offerings. The Blue Oval's reputation could hardly be more upstanding though: it was the same breed of burly Focus ST motor that eased the Zenos E10 from being merely likeable to genuinely desirable not so long ago (before its maker hit choppy waters).

Around the new engine, the Sport 250 remains a chip off the old Lotus Seven block; which is to say Caterham-shaped, but for the familiar Westfield peculiarities. These include the oddly formed and instantly recognizable rear end, and - in the 250's case - a bonnet bulge that you'll occasionally find yourself peering over to the see where the nearside front wheel is. That's not ideal, given the car's innate track day friendliness - nor is the forever spinning gear knob or metal-on-metal rattle of the harness mountings or the half-hood's porous attitude to water.

Arguably such imperfections are all part and parcel of the 250's rudimentary sense of fun, and won't be unexpected by Westfield's regular fans - a sentiment which makes the installation of a new digital dash seem a touch out of sync with the remainder of its surroundings, but commendable nonetheless given the terrifically fragile state of the analogue dials which usually adorn Seven replicas.

Digital dash incongruous, but at least it works!
Digital dash incongruous, but at least it works!

The engine connected to the TFT screen is a manifestly modern item, too. It doesn't blare at you or idle discontentedly, and while its mating to a five-speed MX-5 manual gearbox (and associated differential) might sound a tiny bit Frankenstein, Westfield has endeavoured to make the throttle response a smooth affair; thereby lowering the chances of you stuttering unhappily down the high street.

Its other great attraction is hardly any less conspicuous. There's simply no mistaking the whistle of the blower buried in the nose nor the lift-off effect it generates from 2,500rpm. No surprises there: the Ecoboost's 270lb ft peak twist is enlivening enough in a family hatchback - in a car weighing not a great deal more than half as much, it's just on the right side of savage.

The accessibility and expansiveness of this straight-line glut are generally obliged by Westfield's steering and suspension tune. The former is noticeably slower than Caterham's wrist-flick rack and pinion set-up (making it less sensitive to erroneous input), while the latter - even on 'track day' dampers - has the kind of accommodating primary ride that almost places the 250 in an open-top tourer category.

Fast in a Focus, wild in a Westfield
Fast in a Focus, wild in a Westfield

Consequently, there's much benign amusement to be had from pointing square onto the horizon and zapping forward like a life-size Scalextric model - something the car will do even at motorway speeds what with its truncated final ratio. However, start rummaging around for the same sort of entertainment in corners, and the shortcomings of its placid chassis do crop up rather quickly.

For a while at least, it's fine. The eight-inch wide rear wheels, clad in Toyo R888R rubber, are more than up to a middling level of driver effort, and the engine is so biddable that you tend to make brisk progress by default. It doesn't take long though for that even-tempered steering to start feeling a mite inadequate; especially in those moments when you want it Gurkha-knife sharp for business of scalping apexes.

Instead it gathers weight rather ponderously, and because its rate of response is slow and the cabin small, the amount of lock you're forced to apply starts to seem more than a little cumbersome. This inevitably gets worse when the situation calls for some corrective work in the opposite direction - making it awkward to remedy the kind of slip angle that a Caterham driver would blithely mop up in less than a quarter turn.

Performance is there, handling not quite
Performance is there, handling not quite

This is made more unfortunate by the rear axle's reluctance to break away progressively. The tsunami of available torque available was always liable to make the 250 rather spiky; throw in a lenient suspension now tending toward stodgy together with the Proxes' insistent brand of adhesiveness, and - in damp, autumnal conditions - it's easy to find yourself snatching at the steering wheel in what seems like a full upper body workout.

Still, as is often the case with these things, you do tend to find yourself looking on the bright side; not least because the straight-line performance isn't far shy of a Caterham 620S - and Westfield will put it together for you for around £15,000 less (£20K if you want to do the putting together bit yourself). Of course that doesn't account for a small pile of cost options, but that's another characteristic shared with its closest rival. The fact that the Sport 250 isn't nearly as complete or as much fun as the Seven is the real dampener - but the niche is probably big enough to accommodate its languid idea of how to be indulgently fast. And if not, Westfield has plenty of other irons in the fire.


WESTFIELD SPORT 250
Engine
: 1,998cc, 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 256@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 270@2,500rpm
0-62mph: Not many Mississippis
Top speed: Enough
Weight: Low
MPG: Suprisingly high, probably
CO2: N/A
Price: £25,999 (£35,225.31as tested comprising £895 for limited slip differential, £225 for wide track wishbones, £275 for front anti-roll bar, £250 for rear-anti roll bar, £240 for track day shock absorbers, £255.31 for 205-width R888R tyres, £50 for eight-inch rear wheels, £750 for race front and rear caliper, £495 for digital dask upgrade, £380 for carbon fibre front cycle wings, £400 for FW rear body, £185 for MSA half cage, £350 for Sport Turbo seats, £3,746 for assembly, £450 for IVA test and £280 for registration and road fund license)

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

treeroy

Original Poster:

564 posts

86 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
there is a lot of caterham snobbery but I would love to have a kit car regardless of whether it's the finest around or not so.
Hoping to buy a westfield in 2 years when my fiesta ST lease runs out.!!

treeroy

Original Poster:

564 posts

86 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
culpz said:
Same here. Only really wanted one as of recently.

As a daily though? Props to you, if so. That'd be epic! biggrin
Absolutely! A good car is a good car regardless of how you're driving it, just my opinion tongue out

Worst comes the worst I could get a cheap banger to use occasionally when the westfield isn't safe / doesn't work / isn't convenient, but yes I would love to run a seven type kit car as a daily. They are not too expensive by the looks of it!
I'm only 21 so want to enjoy cars while I can before I get my girlfriend pregnant or whatever lol. And I'd rather be a cool youngster than a dad in a mid life crisis !


Edited by treeroy on Thursday 9th November 15:10

treeroy

Original Poster:

564 posts

86 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
MikeGoodwin said:
As you'll discover soon enough you'll always think you're 21 years old, when your body ages your mind will still be as childish as it is now. Hope you are looking forward to a life of driving sensible Audi A3 tdci or some other bullst repmobile when youre too old for a kit car.

Not butthurt, just saying.
Never gonna happen! I refuse to drive a boring car. There are still fun cars that are practical too for a family when I have kids. No one will ever see me daily driving some german snoremobile.

treeroy

Original Poster:

564 posts

86 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
culpz said:
I'd say don't tempt me but i don't have the cash for one anyway! I can't even seem convince the missus that an MX5/MR2 is a good steer, seeing as we really don't need any kind of practicality whatsoever at current, let alone a kit car!
MX5 is perfectly practical. Decent cabin space and boot will fit most things, well you wouldn't want to move house in it but if you're going somewhere with less than 5 passengers (likely, since you only have 2 seats) the luggage won't be an issue.

My MX5 had a wider boot than my current Fiesta, interestingly - my mate's pool cue would fit in the MX-5 but doesn't fit flat in my fiesta.

MR2 is obviously less practical, in fact I sold my MX5 to an MR2 owner who couldn't live with it on a daily basis due to the storage issues.

treeroy

Original Poster:

564 posts

86 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
culpz said:
Hat off to you sir! Wish i could have done that, at a similar age, but insurance for me has always been a killer.

It would be awesome as a daily. Depreciation is nil. In fact, they're more likely to appreciate, if anything, so buying one will be the hardest and most expensive bit.

Therefore, man maths dictates that it's actually a cheap to run option wink
I am very fortunate to have a decent job, and these type of cars from what I understand are not that expensive to run - they're not crazy on insurance or petrol or maintenance. There's little to go wrong and working on them shouldn't be difficult. The only downside is their practicality, which to be honest I don't really care about. 99% of journeys I don't need to fill a hatchback's boot, so I don't see the issue! Don't know realistically how well it goes in the pouring rain but a little water never hurt anyone, right?

A 7 type kit car is my dream car, I can afford one so I see no reason to have one. I'm happy with my current car but will be changing it in 2 years when the lease ends, and then I see no excuse not to get the car of my dreams!