BMW Z4 M40i vs. Porsche Boxster GTS
Z4 versus Boxster has only been going one way for the past 15 years - what's the verdict now?
You know how this goes - right? Ever since the Z4’s introduction in 2003 - heck, since the Z3 first arrived in the mid-90s - the Porsche Boxster comparisons have been predictable almost to the point of wearisome. Whatever the BMW could offer in terms of silky straight-six performance and front-engined, rear-drive balance, the Porsche could counter; it being just as fast, more engaging to drive and with even greater brand cachet. It’s easy to see how the verdicts fell in the Boxster’s favour.
Things look a little different now, though. This third generation Z4 is better placed than any other, surely, to surpass the Porsche Boxster. After all, this 718 generation can trace a lot of its important bits back to the old 981, first launched in 2012, and there’s the still-much-maligned introduction of four cylinders to contend with. It’s not a new thing, basically. And who wants yesterday’s sports car?
Particularly when it’s this expensive. At list price a Z4 M40i (£48,535) and Boxster S (£53,714) aren’t too far apart. Only Porsche didn’t have an S available, just a GTS. Which is £62,418. And theirs has some options added to it. More options than are fitted to the BMW. So the Z4 is £51,985, while the Boxster is £74,419. Uh oh.
Moreover, against the familiar old Porsche the BMW is so of the moment that you wouldn’t be surprised if the ConnectedDrive cameras were livestreaming your commute to Instagram. The CLAR (Cluster Architecture) platform is new, the interior and infotainment are new, the design is new and, perhaps most importantly, the focus is new. The Supra/Z4 collaboration has achieved notoriety like no other joint sports car project, and promises much. Combine that with the M2-besting Nordschleife lap, the aluminium suspension bits to reduce unsprung mass and wide tracks and it’s easy to see how now could be the Z4’s moment.
That’s to discover later. First off, however, it makes sense to establish just what kind of defence the £74k Boxster can present, with the odds seemingly stacked against it in a way that seldom happens with Porsches. And even before the Z4’s Misano Blue paint and slightly-more-successful-in-the-metal styling arrives, the Boxster has a couple of problems. The interior might best have been described as sturdy and functional a little while ago; in light of cars like the 992, Panamera and Cayenne, it’s as plain as buttered bread. It does what it needs to do, and is unlikely to cause offence, but neither is it inspirational or especially memorable. When style and image are so important in roadsters, that’s a key point. The Boxster just feels a little samey, to look at and to be in, which could make it difficult to get excited about.
But if familiarity breeds something like contempt for the Boxster’s look, interior and image, then driving it is as satisfying as drinking with an old friend in your favourite pub. Nothing is revolutionary or ground breaking, but you’d happily spend hours and hours doing it. And loving it. The Boxster’s genius, of course, is in being mid-engined - and delivering all the poise, deftness and ability you’d expect as a result - with a forgiving, benign, docile edge that’s not typically a strong point for cars configured this way. It means any corner or any change of direction, from roundabouts to hairpins to long sweepers, is a joy.
In Wales the Boxster is as stellar as it’s ever been. There’s the utmost confidence in it, not simply because of the chassis’ innate ability, but because there’s such cohesion to everything the driver has to interact with. There’s no second guessing any input, just immediate faith in steering, throttle response, traction, grip and body control. You push, the car gives back, to any level required. And it’s fabulous. In contemporary Porsche fashion there’s a level of configurability in the PASM dampers, throttle response, assist systems and PDK gearbox, yet regardless of the setting the Boxster reeks of dynamic class. And sunshine in a mid-engined Porsche sports car is still to be enjoyed. Yes - even with that drab noise. Give it 20 minutes and the stoic interior is about as important as the pub décor being dated - it’s just not what you’re there for.
Swap straight from the Boxster to the Z4 and the latter initially feels a little awkward. To say the least. Where everything in the Porsche feels in perfect harmony, the BMW is disjointed. Though there’s clearly prodigious grip from the front of the car - as you’d hope from a 255-section Pilot Super Sport - the steering’s abruptness, numbness and - since this is a BMW - stupidly chubby wheel make it difficult to judge and approach. The brakes are similar - prodigiously powerful, but hard to modulate thanks to a snatchy and awkwardly sited pedal. Where the Porsche driving experience is polished to the point of unerring accuracy, the BMW’s feels a little haphazard at first contact.
That said, there’s clearly some considerable talent here. Those new underpinnings have given the Z4 an admirable level of rigidity, shrugging off imperfections in the road and not letting its composure be ruffled. That certainly wasn’t the case in the previous car. Combine the structural integrity with damping that actually does what it’s meant to do - not always guaranteed with quick BMs - and the pace that can be carried down a road is remarkable. Once your faith builds to the level where you’re convinced the car will do as you ask, that is. The mushy interfaces would be frustrating in isolation; compared with a car as honed as the 718 they’re thrown into even starker light.
There are unequivocal points of praise, however. This new 3.0-litre, turbocharged straight-six is really very good, punchy at low revs yet really energetic at high revs as well, matched to a very smartly calibrated automatic gearbox. Short ratios make it feel even quicker than the stats would suggest, and you don’t need us to tell you which engine is the more pleasant to listen to. The interior is both modern and usable. It’s probably more refined than the Boxster on the motorway. This is better sorted driver’s car than an M Performance 1 Series, and miles ahead of a TT.
The Porsche is still better, though. We wanted an upset as much as anyone, but not this time - not with this Z4 and the Boxster in this form. The fatal blow is that for all the stuff the BMW does well - and there’s plenty of it - there’s nothing (save soundtrack) that the Porsche can’t claim to match. The fact that it’s 130kg lighter, too, is an advantage that pays dividends across the board.
It doesn’t protect it from grievances about the price difference of course, and these are entirely justified given Porsche’s failure to make its 2.5-litre four-pot any more compelling than in its previous guise. But the fact is that much of what makes the Boxster so good is found in a £45k 718 - it’s not exclusive to the flagship model nor its smorgasbord of options. The Porsche rides more plushly on bigger wheels, delivers better traction on narrower tyres, is faster, more exciting and, by the criteria we care about, the better resolved driver’s car. What that means, therefore, is a new and much improved Z4 earns some semblance of a moral victory for coming this close at less money - but the overall verdict favours the Porsche. Sometimes the old ways really are the best...
SPECIFICATION - BMW Z4 M40i
Engine: 2,998cc, six-cyl turbo
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 340@5,000-6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 369@1,600-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.6 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (electronically limited)
Weight: 1,535kg
MPG: 33.2
CO2: 193g/km
Price: £48,535 (as standard; price as tested £51,985 comprised of BMW Icon Adaptive LED headlights for £900, Technology Package (Parking Assistant, Head-up Display, Loudspeaker system, enhanced Bluetooth with wireless charging) for £1,800 and Comfort package (Steering wheel heating, Comfort Access, Wind deflector and Through-loading system) for £750.
SPECIFICATION - PORSCHE 718 BOXSTER GTS
Engine: 2,497cc, flat-4 turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed PDK automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 365@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 317@1,900-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.6sec (4.1sec with Sport+)
Top speed: 180mph
Weight: 1,405kg
MPG: 33.2
CO2: 195g/km
Price: £62,418 (price as standard; price as tested £74,419, comprised of GT Silver Metallic for £581, GTS interior package for £2,096, GTS interior package Carmine Red for £1,242, Headlight cleaning system covers painted for £143, Porsche Doppelkupplung (PDK) for £2,303, PASM sports suspension (20mm) for £168, LED main headlights including Porsche Dynamic Light System Plus (PDLS Plus) for £1,397, Automatically dimming mirrors with integrated rain sensor for £345, Cruise control for £228, ParkAssist with reversing camera for £1,086, Heated multifunction steering wheel for £329, Two-zone automatic climate control for £539, Seat heating for £294, ISOFIX child seat mounting points on passenger seat for £126, Fire extinguisher for £105, Pedals in aluminium for £185, Bose surround sound system for £834.
In fact, I keep thinking what a bargain the early Z4s are right now. Lovely straight six, nice basic RWD handling and probably less likely to throw up big bills than an equivalent age Boxster.
Think I'd still take a 718 Boxster over the new Z4 though.
Definitely the Boxster, 90's looks, four cylinder boxer engine, given life by a hair drier. Screams cannot afford a 911.
BMW please.
In any case: assuming we’re talking about convertibles as that’s what this article is, the Boxster is better looking than a convertible 911 (by miles) and (for many) dynamically superior. If you want an agile and responsive drivers car that looks fabulous, get a manual Boxster. If you want an overstyled boulevard cruiser with a not particularly exciting engine, get the Z4.
They gave me a 718s for a week as a courtesy car.
Glad they did, made the decision very simple. Not a patch on the previous NA
However I bought a mini jcw whilst not as fast it is immeasurably better in every conceivable measure, fun, looks, engine sounds good, drives far better and is light years ahead a nicer place to sit in.
I have owned a Cooper S for two years and a 718CS for one year. I've tracked a 718CS at the PEC too. Though I've not owned a JCW I have driven them, though not on the track.
The MINI is great fun to drive, yes, but it had awful build quality. I had four faults and one factory recall in those two years of ownership. It really was fairly shoddy, and the interior did feel rather low-rent and chintzy.
The Cayman had an excellent interior. Solid build quality throughout, great tech, and the seats were superb.
In terms of driving, well one is a mid-engined, two-seater, low-slung, rear-wheel drive sports car, designed from the ground up to be such, the other is a front-wheel drive semi-hot hatch designed to be sold to the mainstream where cost-saving aimed at competitive pricing is a priority. The two are not in the same market.
The results are as you would expect. The MINI is like any FWD hatch in terms of dynamics, sub-par when compared to RWD, and sub-par when compared to mid-engined placement. The torque steer in the MINI, whilst great fun and faintly hilarious, is correspondingly awful in terms of dynamics. With the JCW it is just more pronounced. The Cayman corners superbly and gives great confidence, as you'd expect. This is the job it is designed to do, which is not the case for the MINI. It seems faintly ridiculous to me to be comparing the two when they are just not in the same market.
Similarly for the suspension set up. The relatively tall MINI rolls and loosens up through the corners. Admittedly fun, but it it is still apples and oranges when compared to the Cayman. Without PASM the Cayman's ride is supple and grippy through the corners. With PASM the suppleness gives more confidence and is improved. This is more noticeable on the track than on the road. Again it seems ridiculous to me to compare these two when they are not in the same market.
The engine, well enough press has been given to Porsche's move from the F6 to the F4. I preferred the induced engine over the more asthmatic NA, it did feel quicker and I liked the lunge the turbine provides, which is why I went for the F4 over the F6, despite the controversial sound. With the MINI, well it's a four-pot lump up at the front giving sub-200hp in the S and a mere 228hp in the JCW. Not a lot in hot-hatch terms which are over 300hp these days, and substantially down on the 350hp of the Cayman S. With both the JCW and 718CS having a kerb weight of around 1,350 kg, it is, yet again, not a realistic comparison between the two, reflected in a ~4.2s 0-62 time for the Cayman S and a relatively pedestrian 6.3s 0-62 time for the JCW, or 6.8s for the S.
Now this is all relatively objective, sure. One is a sports-car the other is a luke-warm hatch. Objectively that's the end of it, the two are not comparable.
Subjectively, none of this applies really. We all have a thousand different subjective reasons for buying a thousand different cars. I am possibly in the market for another S or a JCW as a second car, because they are fantastic fun, subjectively, for me. On this, I agree with you. So long as they can sort out the build-quality, and on that I don't agree with you, as the MINI is not good currently.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff